gpsbabel-misc Mailing List for GPSBabel (Page 5)
Brought to you by:
robertl
You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(45) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
(17) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(38) |
May
(20) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(39) |
Aug
(47) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(14) |
2004 |
Jan
(41) |
Feb
(46) |
Mar
(98) |
Apr
(71) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(68) |
Aug
(59) |
Sep
(78) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(25) |
Dec
(52) |
2005 |
Jan
(51) |
Feb
(63) |
Mar
(47) |
Apr
(36) |
May
(23) |
Jun
(80) |
Jul
(78) |
Aug
(56) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(117) |
Nov
(145) |
Dec
(102) |
2006 |
Jan
(158) |
Feb
(117) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(116) |
May
(102) |
Jun
(80) |
Jul
(168) |
Aug
(161) |
Sep
(112) |
Oct
(88) |
Nov
(90) |
Dec
(84) |
2007 |
Jan
(115) |
Feb
(142) |
Mar
(76) |
Apr
(90) |
May
(165) |
Jun
(91) |
Jul
(158) |
Aug
(108) |
Sep
(58) |
Oct
(69) |
Nov
(136) |
Dec
(60) |
2008 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(87) |
Mar
(79) |
Apr
(90) |
May
(114) |
Jun
(55) |
Jul
(89) |
Aug
(105) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(91) |
Nov
(29) |
Dec
(89) |
2009 |
Jan
(83) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(58) |
Apr
(70) |
May
(62) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(96) |
Aug
(82) |
Sep
(100) |
Oct
(43) |
Nov
(44) |
Dec
(32) |
2010 |
Jan
(69) |
Feb
(61) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(85) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(145) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(54) |
Oct
(89) |
Nov
(44) |
Dec
(58) |
2011 |
Jan
(39) |
Feb
(59) |
Mar
(29) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(37) |
Jun
(31) |
Jul
(43) |
Aug
(48) |
Sep
(23) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(74) |
Dec
(49) |
2012 |
Jan
(43) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(44) |
May
(60) |
Jun
(32) |
Jul
(34) |
Aug
(43) |
Sep
(42) |
Oct
(38) |
Nov
(46) |
Dec
(21) |
2013 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(30) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(29) |
Jul
(31) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(31) |
2014 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(16) |
Mar
(65) |
Apr
(27) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(56) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(26) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(11) |
2015 |
Jan
(25) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(30) |
Apr
(26) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(43) |
Dec
(31) |
2016 |
Jan
(46) |
Feb
(55) |
Mar
(24) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(47) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(17) |
2017 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(12) |
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(34) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(17) |
2019 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(29) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(12) |
Dec
(38) |
2020 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
|
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(30) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(62) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(29) |
Dec
(19) |
2021 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(2) |
2022 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(31) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
(21) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
|
Sep
(16) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(6) |
2023 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
2024 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(17) |
May
|
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(16) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Ric W. <ri...@we...> - 2022-12-31 21:09:15
|
Robert Lipe <rob...@gm...> writes in response to my note about finally using GPSBabel: ... > Cool. Please consider linking to us and I'll do the same. Blogging about GPS use is all but dead and it's getting harder and harder to gain partner link referrals. I just updated https://wermenh.com/gps/index.html with deleting dead links and notes about my use of GPSBabel. It's not at all polished, but it has a (mostly) pretty map from Gaia GPS. It might garner you one or two references. :-) In googling |werme GPS| it appears my protocol document is nowhere to be found any more (and they say the Internet never forgets), so I added that artifact. I also found that Joe Mehaffey's page does live on at http://gpsinformation.net/, but doesn't appear to have been updated since 2015. -Ric |
From: Robert L. <rob...@gp...> - 2022-12-29 20:11:00
|
Gratitude and politeness like this make me wonder why I've spent 21 years creating and supporting FREE software. Unsubscribe here, with the same email address you used to join (which doesn't seem to be this one): https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/options/gpsbabel-misc On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 1:51 PM Keith Cady and Fairan Barnett < red...@hw...> wrote: > Take us off of you list you are just pissing us off with you stupid shit > emails. > |
From: Robert L. <rob...@gp...> - 2022-12-29 19:11:56
|
On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 7:48 AM Ric Werme <ri...@we...> wrote: > Robert Lipe <rob...@gm...> writes: > > > GPSBabel is now drinking age. > > Hey, are you calling me old? > Pots and kettles... > See http://wermenh.com/gps/index.html for broken links, untouched since > 2002 June 22. Maybe I'[ll add a GPSBabel link - it seems to have good > Lots of GPS sites of that era are just no longer with us. Your first link was one of my early introductions and references. I finally had a good use for gpsbabel last year to convert .csv data > collected by various scripts looking at various sources, then edited, then > converted to .gpx files for use reporting on property monitoring visits > for https://www.ausbonsargent.org/ . > Cool. Please consider linking to us and I'll do the same. Blogging about GPS use is all but dead and it's getting harder and harder to gain partner link referrals. That goes for everyone, actually. Please write about your uses of GPSBabel and link to it on your favorite blog or social site. While GPS has become ubiquitous, web traffic for it has been trending down <https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=gps> for years. Our own traffic <https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=gpsbabel> has really bottomed out. Somewhat ironically, I think we're victims of the industry's success. We're just not carrying $600 receivers, each of which needs a custom protocol and its own mapping program. > I really ought to get back into some geocaching.... > For me, it's now a strictly social thing. After my body failed, I just can't scamper around the hills and mountains like I did in 2001. I was a world's top finder in the early days, but my mobility is just shot now. There aren't a lot of us "Charter Members" left, either. > Robert, thank you for bearing the torch for these decades. And thanks to > the many contributers to this worthy tower. > You're welcome! Enjoy. RJL |
From: Ric W. <ri...@we...> - 2022-12-29 13:47:18
|
Robert Lipe <rob...@gm...> writes: > GPSBabel is now drinking age. Hey, are you calling me old? I've been on the mailing list pretty much since the outset but have contributed nothing except maybe some insights about the early Garmin protocol before they documented it. See http://wermenh.com/gps/index.html for broken links, untouched since 2002 June 22. Maybe I'[ll add a GPSBabel link - it seems to have good staying power! I finally had a good use for gpsbabel last year to convert .csv data collected by various scripts looking at various sources, then edited, then converted to .gpx files for use reporting on property monitoring visits for https://www.ausbonsargent.org/ . I really ought to get back into some geocaching.... Robert, thank you for bearing the torch for these decades. And thanks to the many contributers to this worthy tower. -Ric Werme |
From: Greg T. <gd...@le...> - 2022-12-28 23:47:30
|
Robert Lipe <rob...@gm...> writes: > GPSBabel is now drinking age. > > During the Christmas holidays of 2001, I found my first geocaches. I > mistakenly entered the coordinates to one of them, causing me to search a > very wrong location for a hidden piece of tupperware for a very long time. > > Frustrated with the available tools at the time to communicate with my > Map330, I started writing some code to do that. I also created some > coordinate sets in another program and wanted to use those, too, so I > married multiple front ends to the same GPS backend. That code became > GPSBabel when I published it the following year. > > We've come a long way. Thanx to all that have helped or joined this journey. Thank you for sharing your work and helping so many over the years. I've been just a packager and junior curmudgeon, but GPSBabel has helped me many times since I'm really not sure when but probably mid-2000s. |
From: Robert L. <rob...@gm...> - 2022-12-28 23:14:06
|
GPSBabel is now drinking age. During the Christmas holidays of 2001, I found my first geocaches. I mistakenly entered the coordinates to one of them, causing me to search a very wrong location for a hidden piece of tupperware for a very long time. Frustrated with the available tools at the time to communicate with my Map330, I started writing some code to do that. I also created some coordinate sets in another program and wanted to use those, too, so I married multiple front ends to the same GPS backend. That code became GPSBabel when I published it the following year. We've come a long way. Thanx to all that have helped or joined this journey. RJL |
From: tsteven4 <tst...@gm...> - 2022-11-06 21:49:52
|
See https://github.com/GPSBabel/gpsbabel/pull/944 On 11/6/2022 12:35 AM, Jonathan Colledge wrote: > > Hi all, > > Can you please help? > > In order to make indoor cycling video playback smooth when > synchronised with a GPX, it solves a lot of problems streaming when > the video is sped up i.e. 4x (this way the video only really needs to > be slowed and it never breaches 2x speed when the indoor cyclist is > going faster), however, I cannot speed the GPX up. > > Here is what I tried to use: > > If needed, interpolate and create 1 second intervals: > > |"C:\Program Files\GPSBabel\gpsbabel.exe" -i gpx -f "in.gpx" -x > interpolate,time=1 -o gpx -F "Out_Babel_1_second.gpx"| > > Quadruple speed of GPX by wiping the timestamps and convert them to > 0.25 seconds. > > |"C:\Program Files\GPSBabel\gpsbabel.exe" -i gpx -f "in.gpx" -x > track,faketime=f20190506010000+0.25 -o gpx -F "out.gpx"| > > || > > Sadly I think it only works for whole seconds. Is this correct? There > are several devices (Wahoo) that record in millisecond timestamps, is > this possible to be supported please? Or have I got my command format > wrong? > > Thanks, > > Jonathan > > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gpsbabel-misc mailing listhttp://www.gpsbabel.org > Gps...@li... > To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc |
From: tsteven4 <tst...@gm...> - 2022-11-06 21:11:30
|
If your data is sampled at a regular interval you may want to look at the resample filter <https://www.gpsbabel.org/htmldoc-1.8.0/filter_resample.html> as alternative to the interpolate filter. Even though we store times to the millisecond the faketime option currently only supports adding integral numbers of seconds. On 11/6/2022 12:35 AM, Jonathan Colledge wrote: > > Hi all, > > Can you please help? > > In order to make indoor cycling video playback smooth when > synchronised with a GPX, it solves a lot of problems streaming when > the video is sped up i.e. 4x (this way the video only really needs to > be slowed and it never breaches 2x speed when the indoor cyclist is > going faster), however, I cannot speed the GPX up. > > Here is what I tried to use: > > If needed, interpolate and create 1 second intervals: > > |"C:\Program Files\GPSBabel\gpsbabel.exe" -i gpx -f "in.gpx" -x > interpolate,time=1 -o gpx -F "Out_Babel_1_second.gpx"| > > Quadruple speed of GPX by wiping the timestamps and convert them to > 0.25 seconds. > > |"C:\Program Files\GPSBabel\gpsbabel.exe" -i gpx -f "in.gpx" -x > track,faketime=f20190506010000+0.25 -o gpx -F "out.gpx"| > > || > > Sadly I think it only works for whole seconds. Is this correct? There > are several devices (Wahoo) that record in millisecond timestamps, is > this possible to be supported please? Or have I got my command format > wrong? > > Thanks, > > Jonathan > > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gpsbabel-misc mailing listhttp://www.gpsbabel.org > Gps...@li... > To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc |
From: Jonathan C. <jon...@ho...> - 2022-11-06 06:35:28
|
Hi all, Can you please help? In order to make indoor cycling video playback smooth when synchronised with a GPX, it solves a lot of problems streaming when the video is sped up i.e. 4x (this way the video only really needs to be slowed and it never breaches 2x speed when the indoor cyclist is going faster), however, I cannot speed the GPX up. Here is what I tried to use: If needed, interpolate and create 1 second intervals: "C:\Program Files\GPSBabel\gpsbabel.exe" -i gpx -f "in.gpx" -x interpolate,time=1 -o gpx -F "Out_Babel_1_second.gpx" Quadruple speed of GPX by wiping the timestamps and convert them to 0.25 seconds. "C:\Program Files\GPSBabel\gpsbabel.exe" -i gpx -f "in.gpx" -x track,faketime=f20190506010000+0.25 -o gpx -F "out.gpx" Sadly I think it only works for whole seconds. Is this correct? There are several devices (Wahoo) that record in millisecond timestamps, is this possible to be supported please? Or have I got my command format wrong? Thanks, Jonathan Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows |
From: Robert L. <rob...@gp...> - 2022-11-05 06:24:17
|
On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 11:06 PM Gary Turner <g...@el...> wrote: > Did you get an answer? > Without test cases, it's hard to provide help. From GPSBabel version 1.8’s GUI I cannot find a way to specify an output GPX-file waypoint count. As shown in this screenshot, it ran to completion with You can find more filtering options under the button labeled "more options" > You should probably refer to trackpoints. Waypoints are different, and the distinction can be important. The simplify option on waypoints is a bit quizzical. But I don't see any filters (-x ...) being used in that screenshot. > Where the hell do I enter a MAX count?? > > Is that language really appropriate when asking for help? I'm not > offended, but some might be. > I'm not offended, but I also don't go out of my way to help people that come in swinging fists, swearing, and not really providing enough background to get help. Others, like you, are free to volunteer your time as y ou see fit. :-) > And it did NOT recognize “gpsbabel -?” as a command. > > gpsbabel has supported -? for 20+ years. What do I need to know?? > > About windows paths, and where you have it installed. Without a > complicated explanation, and if you have a pretty standard install, you > could try: > > "c:\Program Files (x86)\GPSBabel\gpsbabel.exe" > Or just fix your %PATH. > But then that opens the whole can of worms that is the commandline syntax, > and you may be better avoiding that... > Yet that can also holds the ticket to reproducible questions. Given a set of input files (not provided in this case) running a command to transform that file should be unambiguous and reproducible in most any language and most any operating system. A reproduced command line/batch/shell invocation answers "what have you done" because it's there. Here we're left to guess if his file has any tracks (it wasn't provided) whether he's clicked on filters to filter the track (i don't think so since there's no x) or what options he's set in advanced options (which we'd see on the command line invocation. I think since the filters box isn't green, it's not actually been clicked, so I don't know what filtering options are realistically expected. We have dozens of pages of doc on filtering options. http://www.gpsbabel.org/htmldoc-development/Data_Filters.html |
From: Gary T. <g...@el...> - 2022-11-05 04:05:28
|
Did you get an answer? On 01/11/22 06:37, Dave Owens via Gpsbabel-misc wrote: > > Hi GPSBabel folks, > > As described in the > https://software.frankingermann.de/gpxtrackmap/gtm-documentation/gtm-tips-tricks/gtm-cleaning-up-gpx-files > webpage, I want to play with GPSBabel to try different max counts of > waypoints. > That explanation seems a little over-simplified ;) > > From GPSBabel version 1.8’s GUI I cannot find a way to specify an > output GPX-file waypoint count. As shown in this screenshot, it ran > to completion with NO count entry or specification: > You should probably refer to trackpoints. Waypoints are different, and the distinction can be important. Did you click the 'filters' button? On my rather old version, it's under 'tracks and routes', and I had to tick 'simplify'. > Where the hell do I enter a MAX count?? > Is that language really appropriate when asking for help? I'm not offended, but some might be. > > Then I tried my Windows command prompt simply looking for gpsbabel > version 1.8 command help > > And it did NOT recognize “gpsbabel -?” as a command. > > What do I need to know?? > About windows paths, and where you have it installed. Without a complicated explanation, and if you have a pretty standard install, you could try: "c:\Program Files (x86)\GPSBabel\gpsbabel.exe" But then that opens the whole can of worms that is the commandline syntax, and you may be better avoiding that... |
From: Dave O. <dav...@ve...> - 2022-10-31 18:08:39
|
Hi GPSBabel folks, As described in the https://software.frankingermann.de/gpxtrackmap/gtm-documentation/gtm-tips-tr icks/gtm-cleaning-up-gpx-files webpage, I want to play with GPSBabel to try different max counts of waypoints. From GPSBabel version 1.8's GUI I cannot find a way to specify an output GPX-file waypoint count. As shown in this screenshot, it ran to completion with NO count entry or specification: Where the hell do I enter a MAX count?? Then I tried my Windows command prompt simply looking for gpsbabel version 1.8 command help And it did NOT recognize "gpsbabel -?" as a command. What do I need to know?? Dave Owens Retired Feeding Hills, Massachusetts |
From: tsteven4 <tst...@gm...> - 2022-10-18 19:22:36
|
If you saved the data in some format with the incorrect dates, you should be able to shift the time with the track filter. But your sample works for me. Note the date is not in the GPGGA sentences, but we fill in from the others. If none of the sentences contain the date you should see a message like > nmea: No date found within track (all points dropped)! > nmea: Please use option "date" to preset a valid date for those tracks. Here I have adjusted your data so it isn't from today (GPRMC 181022 -> 181021 and correct checksum) > tsteven4@pedaldamnit:~/work/gpsbabel$ cat test.nmea > $GPRMC,152650.000,A,4831.0287,N,00215.6395,E,1.57,182.26,181021,,,A*60 > $GPGGA,152651.000,4831.0289,N,00215.6395,E,1,05,3.8,68.2,M,47.4,M,,0000*6F > tsteven4@pedaldamnit:~/work/gpsbabel$ ./gpsbabel -i nmea -f test.nmea > -o gpx -F - > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <gpx version="1.0" creator="GPSBabel - https://www.gpsbabel.org" > xmlns="http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/0"> > <time>2022-10-18T19:04:27.269Z</time> > <bounds minlat="48.517145000" minlon="2.260658333" > maxlat="48.517148333" maxlon="2.260658333"/> > <trk> > <trkseg> > <trkpt lat="48.517145000" lon="2.260658333"> > <time>2021-10-18T15:26:50Z</time> > <course>182.259995</course> > <speed>0.807678</speed> > </trkpt> > <trkpt lat="48.517148333" lon="2.260658333"> > <ele>68.200</ele> > <time>2021-10-18T15:26:51Z</time> > <geoidheight>47.4</geoidheight> > <fix>3d</fix> > <sat>5</sat> > <hdop>3.800000</hdop> > </trkpt> > </trkseg> > </trk> > </gpx> On 10/18/2022 12:43 PM, Jean-Pierre Vial wrote: > I just downloaded tracks recorded last week with a canmore 730 logger, > with conversion to gpx > When i wanted to use the tracks to geolocalize photos, it completely > failed, no correlation found. > > BUT > > when I just read the output of the logger, i get many lines like that > > $GPRMC,152650.000,A,4831.0287,N,00215.6395,E,1.57,182.26,181022,,,A*63 > $GPGGA,152651.000,4831.0289,N,00215.6395,E,1,05,3.8,68.2,M,47.4,M,,0000*6F > > The date looks OK > > When I read the conversion by gpsbabel, I get lines with > > <trkpt lat="48.517268746" lon="2.260946649"> > <ele>74.975825</ele> > <time>2003-03-04T12:45:07Z</time> > <speed>0.000000</speed> > <name>TP0007</name> > </trkpt> > > An error of around 19 years in the date > > Unfortunately, I already erased the tracks of last week, so > geolocalization is definitely impossible, but I would like to know what > to do in the future. > |
From: Jean-Pierre V. <vi...@ne...> - 2022-10-18 18:43:24
|
I just downloaded tracks recorded last week with a canmore 730 logger, with conversion to gpx When i wanted to use the tracks to geolocalize photos, it completely failed, no correlation found. BUT when I just read the output of the logger, i get many lines like that $GPRMC,152650.000,A,4831.0287,N,00215.6395,E,1.57,182.26,181022,,,A*63 $GPGGA,152651.000,4831.0289,N,00215.6395,E,1,05,3.8,68.2,M,47.4,M,,0000*6F The date looks OK When I read the conversion by gpsbabel, I get lines with <trkpt lat="48.517268746" lon="2.260946649"> <ele>74.975825</ele> <time>2003-03-04T12:45:07Z</time> <speed>0.000000</speed> <name>TP0007</name> </trkpt> An error of around 19 years in the date Unfortunately, I already erased the tracks of last week, so geolocalization is definitely impossible, but I would like to know what to do in the future. -- Jean-Pierre Vial -- Jean-Pierre Vial |
From: Воскресенский В. <ver...@ya...> - 2022-10-11 15:56:08
|
<div>Здравствуйте. Я уже упоминал о программе DNR GARMIN (уже не поддерживается разработчиком ) на смену ей выпущена другая с похожим названием DNR GPS не имеющая последовательный порт ) , я проводил выгрузку с помощью DNR GARMIN . У этой программы сохранение в старой версии файла GPX , в этом вся и проблема , что многие программы не допонимают старую версию формата GPX и выдают ошибку . Несколько файлов в ручную еще можно было бы отредактировать в текстовом файле , но если их десятки . Было бы неплохо добавить в GPSBabel обработку бинарных гарминовских файлов и выгрузку QDC (<span style="background-color:#ececec;color:#464646;float:none;font-family:'source sans pro' , 'helvetica' , 'arial' , sans-serif;font-size:17.6px;font-style:normal;font-weight:400;text-decoration-style:initial;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px">Quickdraw Contours) . GPS эхолоты есть у многих людей а софта ограничено мало , или консервативно мало ( разработано под определенные модели ). С уважением VADIM.</span></div><div> </div><div>11.10.2022, 10:20, "Matt Wallis" <m7...@ac...>:</div><blockquote><p>On 10/10/2022 19:57, Robert Lipe wrote:</p><blockquote> <br /> <br /> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 5:08 AM Matt Wallis <<a href="mailto:m7...@ac..." rel="noopener noreferrer">m7...@ac...</a><br /> <<a href="mailto:m7...@ac..." rel="noopener noreferrer">mailto:m7...@ac...</a>>> wrote:<br /> <blockquote> gpsbabel 1.6.0 on ubuntu 20.04</blockquote> <br /> <br /> Ancient version. For support, please contact whomever you got it from.<br /> We can only support the current version.</blockquote><p><br />Fair enough! It came with Ubuntu 20.04.<br /> </p><blockquote> <blockquote> Here is an example a GPX file (test.gpx) with two trkseg elements.</blockquote> <br /> <br /> There might be some weirdness if you try to simplify a segment with only<br /> two points. There were also some fixes in this area a few years ago. I<br /> mean, if you simplify something with two points, it doesn't take many<br /> off-by-ones to make it not be a track any more.</blockquote><p><br />I used only 2 points to create a minimal example that demonstrates the<br />issue. Perhaps my expectations of 'simplify' are wrong - I had assumed<br />that the start and end points would be preserved, as, for example, in<br />the Douglas-Peucker algorithm. And so my expectation was that number of<br />points in my minimal example should have been unchanged by 'simplify'.<br /><br />My suspicion is that the gpsbabel 1.6 simplify algorithm does indeed<br />preserve end points, regardless of off-by-ones. But it does so only for<br />the whole track, not for each trkseg separately.<br /><br /> </p><blockquote> RJL</blockquote><p><br /><br />Many thanks for gpsbabel. I will try again once I've upgraded my Ubuntu<br />release. I see that the latest LTS version of Ubuntu comes with<br />gpsbabel 1.8.0.<br /><br /><br />Matt<br /><br /><br /><br />_______________________________________________<br />Gpsbabel-misc mailing list <a href="http://www.gpsbabel.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.gpsbabel.org</a><br /><a href="mailto:Gps...@li..." rel="noopener noreferrer">Gps...@li...</a><br />To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit:<br /><a href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc</a></p></blockquote> |
From: Matt W. <m7...@ac...> - 2022-10-11 07:18:45
|
On 10/10/2022 19:57, Robert Lipe wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 5:08 AM Matt Wallis <m7...@ac... > <mailto:m7...@ac...>> wrote: > >> gpsbabel 1.6.0 on ubuntu 20.04 > > > Ancient version. For support, please contact whomever you got it from. > We can only support the current version. Fair enough! It came with Ubuntu 20.04. > >> Here is an example a GPX file (test.gpx) with two trkseg elements. > > > There might be some weirdness if you try to simplify a segment with only > two points. There were also some fixes in this area a few years ago. I > mean, if you simplify something with two points, it doesn't take many > off-by-ones to make it not be a track any more. I used only 2 points to create a minimal example that demonstrates the issue. Perhaps my expectations of 'simplify' are wrong - I had assumed that the start and end points would be preserved, as, for example, in the Douglas-Peucker algorithm. And so my expectation was that number of points in my minimal example should have been unchanged by 'simplify'. My suspicion is that the gpsbabel 1.6 simplify algorithm does indeed preserve end points, regardless of off-by-ones. But it does so only for the whole track, not for each trkseg separately. > RJL Many thanks for gpsbabel. I will try again once I've upgraded my Ubuntu release. I see that the latest LTS version of Ubuntu comes with gpsbabel 1.8.0. Matt |
From: Robert L. <rob...@gp...> - 2022-10-10 18:58:05
|
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 5:08 AM Matt Wallis <m7...@ac...> wrote: > gpsbabel 1.6.0 on ubuntu 20.04 > Ancient version. For support, please contact whomever you got it from. We can only support the current version. > Here is an example a GPX file (test.gpx) with two trkseg elements. > There might be some weirdness if you try to simplify a segment with only two points. There were also some fixes in this area a few years ago. I mean, if you simplify something with two points, it doesn't take many off-by-ones to make it not be a track any more. > I don't think this is right. Shouldn't the first and last points of each > trkseg be preserved, because GPX models the points within a trkseg as > Probably. RJL |
From: Matt W. <m7...@ac...> - 2022-10-10 10:07:12
|
gpsbabel 1.6.0 on ubuntu 20.04 Here is an example a GPX file (test.gpx) with two trkseg elements. Each trkseg defines a path between 2 points. There is a gap between the end of the first trkseg and the start of the second: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <gpx version="1.0" creator="Matt" xmlns="http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/0"> <trk> <trkseg> <trkpt lat="50.0" lon="0.0" /> <trkpt lat="50.1" lon="0.0" /> </trkseg> <trkseg> <trkpt lat="50.2" lon="0.0" /> <trkpt lat="50.3" lon="0.0" /> </trkseg> </trk> </gpx> Use gpsbabel to simplify the GPX: gpsbabel -i gpx -f test.gpx -x simplify,error=0.1k -o gpx -F test.simplified.gpx the output is like this: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <gpx version="1.0" creator="GPSBabel - http://www.gpsbabel.org" xmlns="http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/0"> <time>2022-10-09T09:16:09.561Z</time> <bounds minlat="50.000000000" minlon="0.000000000" maxlat="50.300000000" maxlon="0.000000000"/> <trk> <trkseg> <trkpt lat="50.000000000" lon="0.000000000"/> </trkseg> <trkseg> <trkpt lat="50.300000000" lon="0.000000000"/> </trkseg> </trk> </gpx> I don't think this is right. Shouldn't the first and last points of each trkseg be preserved, because GPX models the points within a trkseg as contiguous, but points between trksegs as not? See https://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/1/#type_trksegType Kind regards, Matt |
From: Jim H. <pas...@bj...> - 2022-09-22 14:32:38
|
That appears to be the case. I am hoping that there is an archive of older versions somewhere that has a version that runs under OS X 10.13.6. > On Sep 22, 2022, at 5:32 AM, gps...@li... wrote: > > Send Gpsbabel-misc mailing list submissions to > gps...@li... > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > gps...@li... > > You can reach the person managing the list at > gps...@li... > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Gpsbabel-misc digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. GPSBabel for OS X 10.13.6 (High Sierra) (Jim Hays) > 2. Re: GPSBabel for OS X 10.13.6 (High Sierra) (tsteven4) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 15:36:26 -0700 > From: Jim Hays <pas...@bj...> > To: gps...@li... > Subject: [Gpsbabel-misc] GPSBabel for OS X 10.13.6 (High Sierra) > Message-ID: <C9B...@bj...> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Where can I find a version of GPSBabel for OS X 10.13.6 (High Sierra)? > Thank you. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 16:42:10 -0600 > From: tsteven4 <tst...@gm...> > To: gps...@li... > Subject: Re: [Gpsbabel-misc] GPSBabel for OS X 10.13.6 (High Sierra) > Message-ID: <7e2...@gm...> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > I believe the macOS version at http://www.gpsbabel.org/download.html > requires >= 10.14. > > On 9/21/2022 4:36 PM, Jim Hays wrote: >> Where can I find a version of GPSBabel for OS X 10.13.6 (High Sierra)? >> Thank you. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org >> Gps...@li... >> To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit: >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > Gpsbabel-misc mailing list > Gps...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Gpsbabel-misc Digest, Vol 188, Issue 7 > ********************************************* |
From: tsteven4 <tst...@gm...> - 2022-09-21 22:42:18
|
I believe the macOS version at http://www.gpsbabel.org/download.html requires >= 10.14. On 9/21/2022 4:36 PM, Jim Hays wrote: > Where can I find a version of GPSBabel for OS X 10.13.6 (High Sierra)? > Thank you. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org > Gps...@li... > To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc |
From: Jim H. <pas...@bj...> - 2022-09-21 22:36:45
|
Where can I find a version of GPSBabel for OS X 10.13.6 (High Sierra)? Thank you. |
From: Robert L. <rob...@gp...> - 2022-09-19 20:19:01
|
If a substantial (hundreds) number of people ask for it and a maintainer steps forward, it could happen. See last week's thread about minority formats and associated development costs. RJL On Mon, Sep 19, 2022, 7:49 AM Ekkart Leschke <e.l...@we...> wrote: > Thanks, is working fine. > Will compegps come back in future verions? > > Ekkart > > Am 19.09.22 um 14:24 schrieb tsteven4: > > git clone https://github.com/gpsbabel/gpsbabel.git > > > > cd gpsbabel > > > > git checkout gpsbabel_1_7_0 > > > > qmake > > > > make > > > > > > On 9/19/2022 2:51 AM, Ekkart Leschke wrote: > >> the support of compegps tracks etc hs been removed and seems to be now > >> in depricated. At least the track format is still the same as before. > >> > >> As I own a GompGPS device I would like to get the support for compegps > >> tracks (trk) back, at least in the cmd line version. > >> I there a way for this, may by self compiling? > >> > >> Ekkart > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org > >> Gps...@li... > >> To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit: > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org > > Gps...@li... > > To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit: > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc > > > _______________________________________________ > Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org > Gps...@li... > To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc > |
From: SRE <ste...@cl...> - 2022-09-19 18:39:48
|
On 09/09/2022 9:49 AM, Robert Lipe wrote: > /almost all of the maintenance and development is still done by two > people// > / A belated but heartfelt "thank you" for both of you!! It's really impressive that this tool is alive and well after all these years. Steve |
From: Ekkart L. <e.l...@we...> - 2022-09-19 12:48:45
|
Thanks, is working fine. Will compegps come back in future verions? Ekkart Am 19.09.22 um 14:24 schrieb tsteven4: > git clone https://github.com/gpsbabel/gpsbabel.git > > cd gpsbabel > > git checkout gpsbabel_1_7_0 > > qmake > > make > > > On 9/19/2022 2:51 AM, Ekkart Leschke wrote: >> the support of compegps tracks etc hs been removed and seems to be now >> in depricated. At least the track format is still the same as before. >> >> As I own a GompGPS device I would like to get the support for compegps >> tracks (trk) back, at least in the cmd line version. >> I there a way for this, may by self compiling? >> >> Ekkart >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org >> Gps...@li... >> To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit: >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc > > > _______________________________________________ > Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org > Gps...@li... > To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc |