Menu

#11583 inconsistent parents for uracil:cation transporter vs transport

PomBase
closed-fixed
5
2015-03-28
2015-03-18
No

uracil transmembrane transport has
pyrimidine-containing compound transport in its ancestry, but not
nucleobase-containing compound transport

uracil:cation symporter activity
GO:0015932 nucleobase-containing compound transmembrane transporter activity
via
GO:0005350 pyrimidine nucleobase transmembrane transporter activity
GO:0015205 nucleobase transmembrane transporter activity

Could the "nucleobase-containing compound transport" term be added or removed as approproate.

Thanks

v

Discussion

  • Tanya Berardini

    Tanya Berardini - 2015-03-18
    • labels: --> add parent relationship
    • assigned_to: Tanya Berardini
     
  • Tanya Berardini

    Tanya Berardini - 2015-03-20

    This has to do with which CHEBI terms we have used for mapping the GO terms.

    CHEBI:pyrimidines (aka pyrimidine-containing compound)
    CHEBI:pyrimidine
    CHEBI:pyrimidine nucleobase
    CHEBI:pyrimidine nucleoside
    CHEBI:pyrimidine nucleotide

    Looking in ChEBI, it appears that not all pyrimidine-containing compounds (CHEBI:pyrimidines) are nucleobase-containing compounds (CHEBI:nucleobase-containing molecular entity) because not all pyrimidine-containing compounds are nucleobases.

    I'll have to review the mappings more closely. I suspect there are some terms that need remapping and that the remapping will resolve the conflicting links.

     
  • Tanya Berardini

    Tanya Berardini - 2015-03-20

    I think I've found the problem:

    nucleobase-containing molecular entity (CHEBI:61120) has functional parent nucleobase (CHEBI:18282) (instead of is_a)

    so nucleobase transport (parent of uracil transmembrane transport) is not a child of nucleobase-containing compound transport

    In contrast,

    pyrimidines (CHEBI:39447) which we are using in mapping pyrimidine-containing compound is an is_a parent of pyrimidine nucleobase

    This translates into pyrimidine nucleobase TM transporter activity being an is_a child of pyrimidine-containing compound TM transporter activity.

    Solution? Will consult with other GO eds.

     

    Last edit: Tanya Berardini 2015-03-24
  • Tanya Berardini

    Tanya Berardini - 2015-03-25

    I added a new term, 'pyrimidine nucleobase transmembrane transport' GO:1904082 that allows uracil transmembrane transport to go up to nucleobase transport through pyrimidine nucleobase TM transport.

    Modified relations for term GO:1903791 with label: uracil transmembrane transport

    id: GO:1903791
    is_a: GO:0015857 {is_inferred="true"} ! uracil transport
    is_a: GO:1904082 {is_inferred="true"} ! pyrimidine nucleobase transmembrane transport
    intersection_of: GO:0055085 ! transmembrane transport
    intersection_of: transports_or_maintains_localization_of CHEBI:17568 ! uracil
    relationship: transports_or_maintains_localization_of CHEBI:17568 {is_inferred="true"} ! uracil

    Still to discuss what to do with the issues arising from has functional parent relationship in ChEBI.

     
  • Tanya Berardini

    Tanya Berardini - 2015-03-25

    Will delete the relationship between nucleobase transport and nucleobase-containing compound transport after discussion with other GO eds.

     
  • Tanya Berardini

    Tanya Berardini - 2015-03-28

    It was this link that needed deletion:

    nucleobase transmembrane transporter activity
    -is_a: GO:0015932 ! nucleobase-containing compound transmembrane transporter activity

    The link in the BP branch was not present.

     
  • Tanya Berardini

    Tanya Berardini - 2015-03-28

    replaced with
    +is_a: GO:0022891 ! substrate-specific transmembrane transporter activity

     
  • Tanya Berardini

    Tanya Berardini - 2015-03-28
    • status: open --> closed-fixed
     

Log in to post a comment.