Thread: [Fwknop-discuss] Strange error when starting fwknopd 1.9.9
Brought to you by:
mbr
From: Eggert E. <egg...@be...> - 2008-11-23 11:55:02
|
Hello, I changed the option in /etc/fwknop/fwknop.conf from ALERTING_METHODS ALL; to ALERTING_METHODS noemail; When I now restart fwknopd, I get: $ sudo /etc/init.d/fwknop restart Odd number of elements in anonymous hash at /usr/sbin/fwknopd line 4581. [+] knopwatchd is running (pid: 8063), stopping daemon [+] knoptm is running (pid: 8061), stopping daemon [+] fwknopd is running (pid: 8059), stopping daemon Starting the fwknop daemons. Odd number of elements in anonymous hash at /usr/sbin/fwknopd line 4581. eggert@bzug:/usr/local/src/fwknop-1.9.9$ Odd number of elements in anonymous hash at /usr/sbin/knoptm line 672. When I change the option back to the default, the message disappears. The function of fwknop seems not to be affected. Regards Eggert |
From: Franck J. <fra...@dt...> - 2008-11-23 15:04:29
Attachments:
signature.asc
check_mail.diff
|
Eggert Ehmke wrote: > Hello, Hi, > I changed the option in /etc/fwknop/fwknop.conf from > ALERTING_METHODS ALL; > to > ALERTING_METHODS noemail; > > When I now restart fwknopd, I get: > $ sudo /etc/init.d/fwknop restart > Odd number of elements in anonymous hash at /usr/sbin/fwknopd line 4581. > [+] knopwatchd is running (pid: 8063), stopping daemon > [+] knoptm is running (pid: 8061), stopping daemon > [+] fwknopd is running (pid: 8059), stopping daemon > Starting the fwknop daemons. Odd number of elements in anonymous hash > at /usr/sbin/fwknopd line 4581. Michael, what about the enclosed patch? Regards, -- Franck Joncourt http://debian.org - http://smhteam.info/wiki/ Fingerprint : C10E D1D0 EF70 0A2A CACF 9A3C C490 534E 75C0 89FE |
From: Franck J. <fra...@dt...> - 2008-11-23 16:17:57
Attachments:
signature.asc
|
[...] > Michael, what about the enclosed patch? Adding fwknop 1.9.10-pre1 to my repository, I saw you already fixed it ! In my patch, I do not check the mail command if the ALERTING_METHODS variable is set to noe?mail. Regards, -- Franck Joncourt http://debian.org - http://smhteam.info/wiki/ Fingerprint : C10E D1D0 EF70 0A2A CACF 9A3C C490 534E 75C0 89FE |
From: Michael R. <mb...@ci...> - 2008-11-23 18:46:35
|
On Nov 23, 2008, Franck Joncourt wrote: > [...] > > > Michael, what about the enclosed patch? > > Adding fwknop 1.9.10-pre1 to my repository, I saw you already fixed it ! > In my patch, I do not check the mail command if the ALERTING_METHODS > variable is set to noe?mail. Hi Franck - Thanks for submitting the patch. The check_commands() function has a built-in check for the ALERTING_METHODS setting just so that it is easier to ensure that all calls to check_commands() do the right thing (at the slight expense of calling the function to begin with :). Your patch would certainly have fixed the problem though. I ended up noticing the error by reviewing some of the test suite output, but I need to be more careful to catch errors of that kind. Thanks, --Mike > Regards, > > -- > Franck Joncourt > http://debian.org - http://smhteam.info/wiki/ > Fingerprint : C10E D1D0 EF70 0A2A CACF 9A3C C490 534E 75C0 89FE > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Fwknop-discuss mailing list > Fwk...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwknop-discuss |