From: Nikolaus R. <Nik...@ra...> - 2006-01-29 20:58:29
|
Hello, I wonder if it is possible to trick sshfs into using a simple ftp connection, because I'm not really satisfied with the fuseftp perl script (it downloads every file completely if it is accessed). I played around with directport=21 but only got this far: [1] nokile:~$ sshfs -s -f we...@cw... remote/ -o directport=21 missing host see `sshfs -h' for usage [1] nokile:~$ sshfs -s -f we...@cw...:/ remote/ -o directport=21 failed to resolve we...@cw...:21: Name or service not known [1] nokile:~$ I'd be glad if somebody could give me some advice. Thanks for a great piece of software, --Nikolaus -- In der Praxis ist vielen Menschen die Theorie doch lieber als die Praxis. |
From: Miklos S. <mi...@sz...> - 2006-01-29 21:15:18
|
> I wonder if it is possible to trick sshfs into using a simple ftp > connection, because I'm not really satisfied with the fuseftp perl > script (it downloads every file completely if it is accessed). > > I played around with directport=21 but only got this far: > > [1] nokile:~$ sshfs -s -f we...@cw... remote/ -o directport=21 > missing host > see `sshfs -h' for usage > [1] nokile:~$ sshfs -s -f we...@cw...:/ remote/ -o directport=21 > failed to resolve we...@cw...:21: Name or service not known > [1] nokile:~$ > > I'd be glad if somebody could give me some advice. Ftp[1] and sftp[2] are two completely different protocols. So no, it's not going to work. Miklos [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Transfer_Protocol [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SSH_file_transfer_protocol |