Menu

#121 Many repo paths need to be ftss URIs in RDF model

open
nobody
None
5
2003-08-13
2003-04-01
Mike Brown
No

There are still many, many instances of repo paths
appearing in the RDF model where there should be
absolute ftss URIs. Many scopes and statement
subjects are repo paths. You can see them if you do
a '4ss rdf complete'.

Discussion

  • Mike Brown

    Mike Brown - 2003-08-13
    • labels: 377964 -->
    • milestone: 288592 -->
     
  • Mike Brown

    Mike Brown - 2003-08-13

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=371366

    In http://lists.fourthought.com/pipermail/4suite/2003-
    August/005715.html, Uche says:

    MikeO has a fix but it is quite tangled into the other "server
    optimization" work and cannot be untangled without
    significant effort. As a result, we decided that this bug would
    be known but unfixed in 1.0. The 1.1 branch should emerge
    soon thereafter with the fix and the heavy optimization work.
    My apologies for the inconvenience. I pushed for us to nail
    this one, but MikeO convinced me it would mean significant
    delay of 1.0. Another factor in our deciding not to fix this for
    1.0 is that there are workarounds, which generally involve
    writing functions that add and subtract the "ftss://" at the
    places where the bug causes inconsistencies. Evan Lenz
    already navigated this and perhaps he has a few quick
    pointers on how he worked around it? Once we do fix the
    bug, URIs for resource objects will *always* start
    with "ftss://". Of course, non-URI uses (e.g. paths specified
    on the command line) will just be the plain path (i.e.
    no "ftss://").

     
  • mongryong

    mongryong - 2004-08-12

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=1098276

    See Patch: [ 1004040 ] GetUserNsMappings function requires
    RepoPathToUri

     

Log in to post a comment.