From: David R. M. <dr...@ma...> - 2003-12-25 05:33:13
|
Ben Hines <bh...@al...> wrote: > Why not use the new info file name format? > > it sure helps to track changes. > > -Ben > > On Dec 24, 2003, at 12:38 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: > > > Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.2-gcc3.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/base > > In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv2951 > > > > Added Files: > > fink-0.17.3-1.info fink-mirrors-0.0.2-2.info > > Removed Files: > > fink-0.17.2-1.info fink-mirrors-0.0.2-1.info > > Log Message: > > new versions > > Hi Ben. I agree that the new format has many advantages. However, right at the moment, we are managing at least 4 different trees (stable/unstable for both 10.2-gcc3.3/10.3), and I'm finding it to be quite difficult to keep track of which versions are where, when the version numbers are not part of the name. I'll become a bigger fan of the new format once the conversion to 10.3 is complete. -- Dave |