From: Richard M. <ri...@fa...> - 2013-10-30 17:42:37
|
Hi everyone, Do you know what this means? 2013-10-30 17:01:18,523 fail2ban.actions.action: ERROR ipfw table 1 add 62.76.43.182 returned 4700 It's a new jail I added using the same bsw-ipfw add to table action, it's using a separate filter with just 1 regular expression. I thought I better upgrade to the latest version of fail2ban, but the error persists. Thanks, Rich |
From: Daniel B. <dan...@in...> - 2013-10-31 00:58:28
|
On 31/10/13 04:27, Richard Mealing wrote: > Hi everyone, > > > > Do you know what this means? > Basicly ipfw returned an error. > 2013-10-30 17:01:18,523 fail2ban.actions.action: ERROR ipfw table 1 add > 62.76.43.182 returned 4700 What error to you get if you run this command on the command line? What are your current ipfw rules? |
From: Richard M. <ri...@fa...> - 2013-10-31 09:04:12
|
Hi Daniel, Sorry for top posting. You are correct, it's just a duplication problem. 2013-10-31 08:13:47,786 fail2ban.actions: WARNING [sendmail] Ban 213.25.128.13 2013-10-31 08:13:48,376 fail2ban.actions: WARNING [sendmailpasswd] Ban 213.25.128.13 2013-10-31 08:13:48,381 fail2ban.actions.action: ERROR ipfw table 1 add 213.25.128.13 returned 4700 2013-10-31 08:13:48,796 fail2ban.actions: INFO [sendmail] 213.25.128.13 already banned # ipfw table 1 add 213.25.128.13 ipfw: setsockopt(IP_FW_TABLE_ADD): File exists My sendmail jail banned the IP and this sendmailpasswd jail then tried the same, causing the error. I'll change it around a little.. Thanks, Rich -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Black [mailto:dan...@in...] Sent: 31 October 2013 00:57 To: fai...@li... Subject: Re: [Fail2ban-users] 2013-10-30 17:01:18, 523 fail2ban.actions.action: ERROR ipfw table 1 add X.X.X.X returned 4700 On 31/10/13 04:27, Richard Mealing wrote: > Hi everyone, > > > > Do you know what this means? > Basicly ipfw returned an error. > 2013-10-30 17:01:18,523 fail2ban.actions.action: ERROR ipfw table 1 > add > 62.76.43.182 returned 4700 What error to you get if you run this command on the command line? What are your current ipfw rules? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Android is increasing in popularity, but the open development platform that developers love is also attractive to malware creators. Download this white paper to learn more about secure code signing practices that can help keep Android apps secure. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=65839951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Fail2ban-users mailing list Fai...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fail2ban-users |
From: Daniel B. <dan...@in...> - 2013-10-31 21:28:41
|
On 31/10/13 20:03, Richard Mealing wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Sorry for top posting. > I've never cared against top posting. > You are correct, it's just a duplication problem. > > 2013-10-31 08:13:47,786 fail2ban.actions: WARNING [sendmail] Ban 213.25.128.13 > 2013-10-31 08:13:48,376 fail2ban.actions: WARNING [sendmailpasswd] Ban 213.25.128.13 > 2013-10-31 08:13:48,381 fail2ban.actions.action: ERROR ipfw table 1 add 213.25.128.13 returned 4700 > 2013-10-31 08:13:48,796 fail2ban.actions: INFO [sendmail] 213.25.128.13 already banned > > # ipfw table 1 add 213.25.128.13 > ipfw: setsockopt(IP_FW_TABLE_ADD): File exists > > My sendmail jail banned the IP and this sendmailpasswd jail then tried the same, causing the error. I'll change it around a little.. > Use the table= argument to the action to specify a different number for each jail. |