From: Tobi K. <tob...@be...> - 2011-03-28 18:38:42
|
Hi all! As some of you already know we are working on a integration of betterFORM into eXist. We are more or less ready to commit our last changes to the stable and trunk branches but want to test a much as we can before actually committing. What we did till now is to run the junit-tests against it and so far everything seems to be ok ( 1 test fails in trunk ). I already talk to Leif-Jöran and Dannes about it and they mentioned it would be a good idea to run the XQuery Testsuite against the integration. Which leads to my actual question: How can i run the test suite? I tried the xqts/report.xql from the example page. Which right now seems not to work, or i already broke something. Error: Cannot compile xquery: XPST0081: No namespace defined for prefix file [at line 41, column 37] Any Help or Hints pointing me in the right direction are much appreciated. If you have more Ideas what we should test before committing that would also be of great help. THX and Cheers Tobi |
From: Wolfgang M. <wol...@ex...> - 2011-03-28 18:52:19
|
> I tried the xqts/report.xql from the example page. Which right now seems not > to work, or i already broke something. > > Error: > Cannot compile xquery: XPST0081: No namespace defined for prefix file [at line > 41, column 37] You need to enable the module in extensions/build.properties and/or conf.xml. In conf.xml, just search for FileModule and uncomment the corresponding element. Right now I use version 1.0.2 of the XQuery test suite for comparison. The overall result should be around 99.4%. 1.0.3 will show more errors (mainly because the setup changed). Wolfgang |
From: Dmitriy S. <sha...@gm...> - 2011-03-28 19:28:55
|
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Wolfgang Meier <wol...@ex...>wrote: > > I tried the xqts/report.xql from the example page. Which right now seems > not > > to work, or i already broke something. > > > > Error: > > Cannot compile xquery: XPST0081: No namespace defined for prefix file > [at line > > 41, column 37] > > You need to enable the module in extensions/build.properties and/or > conf.xml. In conf.xml, just search for FileModule and uncomment the > corresponding element. > On preconference I heard interesting idea to use disable attribute instead of putting modules description into comments. I can do it at refactoring time. -- Dmitriy Shabanov |
From: Joe W. <jo...@gm...> - 2011-03-28 20:05:36
|
> On preconference I heard interesting idea to use disable attribute instead > of putting modules description into comments. I can do it at refactoring > time. +1 This would make it much easier to automate changes to conf.xml. |
From: Adam R. <ad...@ex...> - 2011-03-28 20:11:04
|
On 28 March 2011 20:51, Wolfgang Meier <wol...@ex...> wrote: >> I tried the xqts/report.xql from the example page. Which right now seems not >> to work, or i already broke something. >> >> Error: >> Cannot compile xquery: XPST0081: No namespace defined for prefix file [at line >> 41, column 37] > > You need to enable the module in extensions/build.properties and/or > conf.xml. In conf.xml, just search for FileModule and uncomment the > corresponding element. You need to do both, and you also need to do a rebuild of the extension modules before starting exist up again, from $EXIST_HOME you can do ./build.sh extension-modules > Right now I use version 1.0.2 of the XQuery test suite for comparison. > The overall result should be around 99.4%. 1.0.3 will show more errors > (mainly because the setup changed). > > Wolfgang > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Create and publish websites with WebMatrix > Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; > WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and publish > your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf > _______________________________________________ > Exist-development mailing list > Exi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-development > -- Adam Retter eXist Developer { United Kingdom } ad...@ex... irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb |
From: Dannes W. <da...@ex...> - 2011-03-29 07:43:13
|
Hi, On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Joe Wicentowski <jo...@gm...> wrote: > > On preconference I heard interesting idea to use disable attribute > instead > > of putting modules description into comments. I can do it at refactoring > > time. > > +1 > > This would make it much easier to automate changes to conf.xml. > > Currently I enable/disable a whole block of modules in one go ; if it must be changed per item...... it is a lot of work. A change must match both scenarios..... D. -- eXist-db Native XML Database - http://exist-db.org Join us on linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=35624 |
From: Adam R. <ad...@ex...> - 2011-03-29 09:36:02
|
Well I have some ideas about modules which I discussed with some people also at the pre-conference, but I am not sure I mentioned it to you guys. This should be a topic for discussion in one of our Friday developer conferences. On 29 March 2011 09:42, Dannes Wessels <da...@ex...> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Joe Wicentowski <jo...@gm...> wrote: >> >> > On preconference I heard interesting idea to use disable attribute >> > instead >> > of putting modules description into comments. I can do it at refactoring >> > time. >> >> +1 >> >> This would make it much easier to automate changes to conf.xml. >> > > Currently I enable/disable a whole block of modules in one go ; if it must > be changed per item...... it is a lot of work. A change must match both > scenarios..... > > D. > > -- > eXist-db Native XML Database - http://exist-db.org > Join us on linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=35624 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the > growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses > are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software > be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker > today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar > _______________________________________________ > Exist-development mailing list > Exi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-development > > -- Adam Retter eXist Developer { United Kingdom } ad...@ex... irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb |
From: Joe W. <jo...@gm...> - 2011-03-29 11:29:49
|
>> This would make it much easier to automate changes to conf.xml. > > Currently I enable/disable a whole block of modules in one go ; if it must > be changed per item...... it is a lot of work. A change must match both > scenarios..... How about: <modules> <enabled-modules> ... </> <disabled-modules> ... </> </> This would let you copy/paste large blocks between enabled & disabled, and would still facilitate transformations. Just an idea. Adam's idea is probably better. Joe |
From: Adam R. <ad...@ex...> - 2011-03-29 12:48:14
|
We should move this to its own thread... > How about: > > <modules> > <enabled-modules> > ... > </> > <disabled-modules> > ... > </> > </> > > This would let you copy/paste large blocks between enabled & disabled, > and would still facilitate transformations. Just an idea. Adam's > idea is probably better. I was thinking more along the lines of the folders extensions-available and extensions-enabled. All modules jars reside in extensions-available and you can simple link them into extensions-enabled as you require. And for those of you on Windows, dont worry there is a link tool available for Windows also. > > Joe > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the > growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses > are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software > be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker > today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar > _______________________________________________ > Exist-development mailing list > Exi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-development > -- Adam Retter eXist Developer { United Kingdom } ad...@ex... irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb |
From: Tobi K. <tob...@be...> - 2011-03-29 12:23:28
|
On Monday 28 March 2011 22:10:57 Adam Retter wrote: > You need to do both, and you also need to do a rebuild of the > extension modules before starting exist up again, from $EXIST_HOME you > can do ./build.sh extension-modules > Hi, i got it running now. Thanks again for the help. My current test results are : Junit: stable 100% and 1 fail in trunk (testRangeIndex3) which also seems to occur without enabling the extensions. XQTS: stable and trunk 99.3% (Minimal Conformance). If it is okay with you i would commit our changes to subversion. Should i use Joern´s credentials or can you provide another login for me? Last but not least: Should i leave the extension enabled by default or turn it off again? Cheers Tobi |
From: Adam R. <ad...@ex...> - 2011-03-29 12:50:49
|
On 29 March 2011 14:23, Tobi Krebs <tob...@be...> wrote: > On Monday 28 March 2011 22:10:57 Adam Retter wrote: >> You need to do both, and you also need to do a rebuild of the >> extension modules before starting exist up again, from $EXIST_HOME you >> can do ./build.sh extension-modules >> > Hi, > > i got it running now. > > Thanks again for the help. > > My current test results are : > > Junit: stable 100% and 1 fail in trunk (testRangeIndex3) which also seems to > occur without enabling the extensions. Indeed, that is the case. You can always check this quickly by using the Guest Login here (its the link below the login boxes) - http://serengeti.friprogramvarusyndikatet.se:8111/viewType.html?buildTypeId=bt2&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv > XQTS: stable and trunk 99.3% (Minimal Conformance). > > If it is okay with you i would commit our changes to subversion. Please do. > Should i use Joern´s credentials or can you provide another login for me? If you give me your Subversion username then I will add you as a committer. Credit where credit is due, right? > Last but not least: Should i leave the extension enabled by default or turn it > off again? Well, I rather like in enabled by default. But this sort of question causes holy wars, so I will leave it entirely up to you ;-) > Cheers > > Tobi > > > -- Adam Retter eXist Developer { United Kingdom } ad...@ex... irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb |
From: Wolfgang M. <wol...@ex...> - 2011-03-29 12:54:42
|
> Well, I rather like in enabled by default. But this sort of question > causes holy wars, so I will leave it entirely up to you ;-) I think it should be enabled by default. The goal is to make it easy for new users to get started with xforms. Wolfgang |
From: Dmitriy S. <sha...@gm...> - 2011-03-29 15:10:21
|
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Dannes Wessels <da...@ex...> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Joe Wicentowski <jo...@gm...>wrote: > >> > On preconference I heard interesting idea to use disable attribute >> instead >> > of putting modules description into comments. I can do it at refactoring >> > time. >> >> +1 >> >> This would make it much easier to automate changes to conf.xml. >> >> > Currently I enable/disable a whole block of modules in one go ; if it must > be changed per item...... it is a lot of work. A change must match both > scenarios..... > Attribute do not force you to do not use comments way :-) -- Dmitriy Shabanov |
From: Tobi K. <tob...@be...> - 2011-03-29 15:29:47
|
On Tuesday 29 March 2011 14:54:40 Wolfgang Meier wrote: > > Well, I rather like in enabled by default. But this sort of question > > causes holy wars, so I will leave it entirely up to you ;-) > > I think it should be enabled by default. The goal is to make it easy > for new users to get started with xforms. > > Wolfgang Okay i committed both version to stable and trunk. I enabled the extension per default and set the XFormsFilter so it will react on XForms served from the Database ("/rest/db/*"). I hope that´s okay. If there are any problems concerning the extension feel free to contact us. Tobi |
From: Thomas W. <tho...@gm...> - 2011-03-29 15:31:52
|
I am in favour for adding attributes disabled="yes". I do not think we should compare how we do things manually (uncommenting blocks) with how we are going to work with the config files. It is more likely to set/remove the @disabled attribute using build scripts or some other tools. Thomas ------ Thomas White Mobile:+44 7711 922 966 Skype: thomaswhite gTalk: thomas.0007 http://www.linkedin.com/in/thomaswhite0007 http://www.facebook.com/thomas.0007 On 29 March 2011 16:10, Dmitriy Shabanov <sha...@gm...> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Dannes Wessels <da...@ex...>wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Joe Wicentowski <jo...@gm...>wrote: >> >>> > On preconference I heard interesting idea to use disable attribute >>> instead >>> > of putting modules description into comments. I can do it at >>> refactoring >>> > time. >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> This would make it much easier to automate changes to conf.xml. >>> >>> >> Currently I enable/disable a whole block of modules in one go ; if it must >> be changed per item...... it is a lot of work. A change must match both >> scenarios..... >> > > Attribute do not force you to do not use comments way :-) > > -- > Dmitriy Shabanov > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the > growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses > are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software > be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker > today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar > _______________________________________________ > Exist-development mailing list > Exi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-development > > |
From: Dannes W. <da...@ex...> - 2011-03-29 15:45:39
Attachments:
smime.p7s
|
On 29 Mar 2011, at 17:31 , Thomas White wrote: > I am in favour for adding attributes disabled="yes" I'd like to approach things in a more positive way: enabled="yes" (or true) -- Dannes Wessels eXist-db Open Source Native XML Database e: da...@ex... w: http://www.exist-db.org |
From: Adam R. <ad...@ex...> - 2011-03-29 18:28:12
|
Great Tobi, Thanks very much. Do you want to post a quick message in a new clean thread also, advertising this fact and maybe explaining how people could get started quickly with their first XForm in eXist-db+betterForm? On 29 March 2011 17:29, Tobi Krebs <tob...@be...> wrote: > On Tuesday 29 March 2011 14:54:40 Wolfgang Meier wrote: >> > Well, I rather like in enabled by default. But this sort of question >> > causes holy wars, so I will leave it entirely up to you ;-) >> >> I think it should be enabled by default. The goal is to make it easy >> for new users to get started with xforms. >> >> Wolfgang > > Okay i committed both version to stable and trunk. > > I enabled the extension per default and set the XFormsFilter so it will react > on XForms served from the Database ("/rest/db/*"). > > I hope that´s okay. > > If there are any problems concerning the extension feel free to contact us. > > Tobi > -- Adam Retter eXist Developer { United Kingdom } ad...@ex... irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb |
From: Joern T. <joe...@go...> - 2011-04-05 15:21:25
|
Hi Adam, On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Adam Retter <ad...@ex...> wrote: > Great Tobi, Thanks very much. > > Do you want to post a quick message in a new clean thread also, > advertising this fact and maybe explaining how people could get > started quickly with their first XForm in eXist-db+betterForm? Yes, that's high on the list but is probably my job to deliver. I'll try to write it down and send it. cheers, Joern > > > On 29 March 2011 17:29, Tobi Krebs <tob...@be...> wrote: >> On Tuesday 29 March 2011 14:54:40 Wolfgang Meier wrote: >>> > Well, I rather like in enabled by default. But this sort of question >>> > causes holy wars, so I will leave it entirely up to you ;-) >>> >>> I think it should be enabled by default. The goal is to make it easy >>> for new users to get started with xforms. >>> >>> Wolfgang >> >> Okay i committed both version to stable and trunk. >> >> I enabled the extension per default and set the XFormsFilter so it will react >> on XForms served from the Database ("/rest/db/*"). >> >> I hope that´s okay. >> >> If there are any problems concerning the extension feel free to contact us. >> >> Tobi >> > > > > -- > Adam Retter > > eXist Developer > { United Kingdom } > ad...@ex... > irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the > growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses > are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software > be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker > today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar > _______________________________________________ > Exist-development mailing list > Exi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-development > |
From: <ht...@ma...> - 2011-04-04 15:58:07
|
Tobi Krebs <tob...@be...> writes: > On Tuesday 29 March 2011 14:54:40 Wolfgang Meier wrote: >> > Well, I rather like in enabled by default. But this sort of question >> > causes holy wars, so I will leave it entirely up to you ;-) >> >> I think it should be enabled by default. The goal is to make it easy >> for new users to get started with xforms. >> >> Wolfgang > > Okay i committed both version to stable and trunk. I believe there's a bug in this release. Have you tried xforms/hello.xml ? Somewhat to my surprise, hello2.xml works, but hello.xml does not. The problem is in betterform-Full.js, which hits a bug, which blows out the initialisation, which means that the default path (betterform/Flux) is never overriden, leading to a 404 on /betterform/Flux/call/plaincall/Flux.dispatchEventType.dwr To trigger this, I did svn update in the exist trunk, built exist and confirmed that betterform was installed OK. Because bf now gets all its resources from inside its jar file, I can't easily debug further. I do not have a completely vanilla web.xml, so it is possible there is a confounding problem somewhere -- can anyone else reproduce, i.e. does xforms/hello.xml work for you Tobias? ht -- Henry S. Thompson, Markup Systems Ltd. Cavers Garden Farm, Denholm; by Hawick; TD9 8LN +44 (0) 7866 471 388 Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht...@ma... URL: http://www.markup.co.uk/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] |
From: <ht...@ma...> - 2011-04-04 20:58:35
|
ht...@ma... (Henry S. Thompson) writes: > Tobi Krebs <tob...@be...> writes: > >> On Tuesday 29 March 2011 14:54:40 Wolfgang Meier wrote: >>> > Well, I rather like in enabled by default. But this sort of question >>> > causes holy wars, so I will leave it entirely up to you ;-) >>> >>> I think it should be enabled by default. The goal is to make it easy >>> for new users to get started with xforms. >>> >>> Wolfgang >> >> Okay i committed both version to stable and trunk. > > I believe there's a bug in this release. > > Have you tried xforms/hello.xml ? > > Somewhat to my surprise, hello2.xml works, but hello.xml does not. Ah. Fails in Chrome (10.0.648.204) and Opera (11.01), but works in Firefox (3.6.15) and IE8. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, Markup Systems Ltd. Cavers Garden Farm, Denholm; by Hawick; TD9 8LN +44 (0) 7866 471 388 Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht...@ma... URL: http://www.markup.co.uk/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] |
From: Joern T. <joe...@go...> - 2011-04-05 08:13:18
|
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Henry S. Thompson <ht...@ma...> wrote: > Tobi Krebs <tob...@be...> writes: > >> On Tuesday 29 March 2011 14:54:40 Wolfgang Meier wrote: >>> > Well, I rather like in enabled by default. But this sort of question >>> > causes holy wars, so I will leave it entirely up to you ;-) >>> >>> I think it should be enabled by default. The goal is to make it easy >>> for new users to get started with xforms. >>> >>> Wolfgang >> >> Okay i committed both version to stable and trunk. > > I believe there's a bug in this release. > > Have you tried xforms/hello.xml ? > > Somewhat to my surprise, hello2.xml works, but hello.xml does not. hm, i wasn't aware that we still have those - i remember that we renamed those files to have an .xhtml suffix as there was a problem with eXist serving all .xml files as documentation and piping them through the documentation stylesheet. As a result the XFormsFilter got the transformed html instead of the plain xml file. We have now changed our filter mapping to only work on files located somewhere below the 'db' collection. This allows to have both XSLTForms and betterFORM and have them working side by side. As i just saw we do not have a hello.xml and hello2.xml any more in our repository. Tobi is on travel this week so i'm not completely sure what happened to them. > > The problem is in betterform-Full.js, which hits a bug, which blows out the > initialisation, which means that the default path (betterform/Flux) is > never overriden, leading to a 404 on > /betterform/Flux/call/plaincall/Flux.dispatchEventType.dwr > > To trigger this, I did svn update in the exist trunk, built exist and > confirmed that betterform was installed OK. Because bf now gets all > its resources from inside its jar file, I can't easily debug further. I remember to have promised a howto for working with eXist and betterFORM - of course there is a way to deploy an uncompressed version of the JS which in turn will allow debugging. I try to get this howto ready this week and you will find it on http://betterform.wordpress.com. Thanks for reporting this. Joern > > I do not have a completely vanilla web.xml, so it is possible there is > a confounding problem somewhere -- can anyone else reproduce, > i.e. does xforms/hello.xml work for you Tobias? > > ht > -- > Henry S. Thompson, Markup Systems Ltd. > Cavers Garden Farm, Denholm; by Hawick; TD9 8LN > +44 (0) 7866 471 388 > Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht...@ma... > URL: http://www.markup.co.uk/ > [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Create and publish websites with WebMatrix > Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; > WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and > publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf > _______________________________________________ > Exist-development mailing list > Exi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-development > |
From: Dmitriy S. <sha...@gm...> - 2011-04-05 16:47:51
|
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Dannes Wessels <da...@ex...> wrote: > > On 29 Mar 2011, at 17:31 , Thomas White wrote: > > > I am in favour for adding attributes disabled="yes" > > I'd like to approach things in a more positive way: enabled="yes" (or true) > So be. -- Dmitriy Shabanov |
From: Вячеслав С. <sch...@gm...> - 2011-04-05 18:42:19
|
maybe not so bad idea to combine betterform sample and packaging sample in one case - https://www.betterform.de/trac/wiki/XRX look little complex (to my mind) 2011/4/5 Dmitriy Shabanov <sha...@gm...>: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Dannes Wessels <da...@ex...> wrote: >> >> On 29 Mar 2011, at 17:31 , Thomas White wrote: >> >> > I am in favour for adding attributes disabled="yes" >> >> I'd like to approach things in a more positive way: enabled="yes" (or >> true) > > So be. > -- > Dmitriy Shabanov > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Xperia(TM) PLAY > It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming > smartphone on the nation's most reliable network. > And it wants your games. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev > _______________________________________________ > Exist-development mailing list > Exi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-development > > |
From: Joern T. <joe...@go...> - 2011-04-05 20:28:53
|
2011/4/5 Вячеслав Седов <sch...@gm...>: > maybe not so bad idea to combine betterform sample and packaging > sample in one case - https://www.betterform.de/trac/wiki/XRX look > little complex (to my mind) Sorry - don't get it - what do you mean by combining 'sample and packaging sample in one case' btw - the url you mention is a bit outdated. We have to rewrite that. That's what i have on my list for the next days. Joern > > 2011/4/5 Dmitriy Shabanov <sha...@gm...>: >> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Dannes Wessels <da...@ex...> wrote: >>> >>> On 29 Mar 2011, at 17:31 , Thomas White wrote: >>> >>> > I am in favour for adding attributes disabled="yes" >>> >>> I'd like to approach things in a more positive way: enabled="yes" (or >>> true) >> >> So be. >> -- >> Dmitriy Shabanov >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Xperia(TM) PLAY >> It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming >> smartphone on the nation's most reliable network. >> And it wants your games. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev >> _______________________________________________ >> Exist-development mailing list >> Exi...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-development >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Xperia(TM) PLAY > It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming > smartphone on the nation's most reliable network. > And it wants your games. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev > _______________________________________________ > Exist-development mailing list > Exi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-development > |
From: Вячеслав С. <sch...@gm...> - 2011-04-06 03:20:52
|
i mean "Package Repository" page in eXist-db admin - good case to introduce both packaging system & betterforms at one step (if possible) 6 апреля 2011 г. 0:28 пользователь Joern Turner <joe...@go...> написал: > 2011/4/5 Вячеслав Седов <sch...@gm...>: >> maybe not so bad idea to combine betterform sample and packaging >> sample in one case - https://www.betterform.de/trac/wiki/XRX look >> little complex (to my mind) > Sorry - don't get it - what do you mean by combining 'sample and > packaging sample in one case' > > btw - the url you mention is a bit outdated. We have to rewrite that. > That's what i have on my list for the next days. > > Joern > >> >> 2011/4/5 Dmitriy Shabanov <sha...@gm...>: >>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Dannes Wessels <da...@ex...> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 29 Mar 2011, at 17:31 , Thomas White wrote: >>>> >>>> > I am in favour for adding attributes disabled="yes" >>>> >>>> I'd like to approach things in a more positive way: enabled="yes" (or >>>> true) >>> >>> So be. >>> -- >>> Dmitriy Shabanov >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Xperia(TM) PLAY >>> It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming >>> smartphone on the nation's most reliable network. >>> And it wants your games. >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Exist-development mailing list >>> Exi...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-development >>> >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Xperia(TM) PLAY >> It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming >> smartphone on the nation's most reliable network. >> And it wants your games. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev >> _______________________________________________ >> Exist-development mailing list >> Exi...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-development >> > |