From: Wes J. <com...@gm...> - 2011-04-20 16:11:58
|
Any ETA on 1.90 release? -wes |
From: Claes W. <kl...@ta...> - 2011-04-20 17:42:19
|
On 04/20/2011 06:11 PM, Wes James wrote: > Any ETA on 1.90 release? > > -wes Steve will have to answer this, he's the one doing all the work !! /klacke |
From: Steve V. <vi...@ie...> - 2011-04-20 18:19:35
|
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Claes Wikstrom <kl...@ta...> wrote: > On 04/20/2011 06:11 PM, Wes James wrote: >> Any ETA on 1.90 release? >> >> -wes > > Steve will have to answer this, he's the one doing all the work !! :-) Well, that's not entirely true, since you always do all the actual release work, updating yaws.hyber.org, etc. I think we could do a 1.90 release at any time, and I'm all for doing one soon. There are a couple things I'm working on that I'll try to wrap up and then we'll be ready. --steve |
From: Claes W. <kl...@ta...> - 2011-04-20 18:22:20
|
On 04/20/2011 08:19 PM, Steve Vinoski wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Claes Wikstrom<kl...@ta...> wrote: >> On 04/20/2011 06:11 PM, Wes James wrote: >>> Any ETA on 1.90 release? >>> >>> -wes >> >> Steve will have to answer this, he's the one doing all the work !! > > :-) Well, that's not entirely true, since you always do all the actual > release work, updating yaws.hyber.org, etc. > > I think we could do a 1.90 release at any time, and I'm all for doing > one soon. There are a couple things I'm working on that I'll try to > wrap up and then we'll be ready. > Ok, I'm game. Just say the word. /klacke |
From: Wes J. <com...@gm...> - 2011-04-20 18:23:58
|
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Steve Vinoski <vi...@ie...> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Claes Wikstrom <kl...@ta...> wrote: >> On 04/20/2011 06:11 PM, Wes James wrote: >>> Any ETA on 1.90 release? >>> >>> -wes >> >> Steve will have to answer this, he's the one doing all the work !! > > :-) Well, that's not entirely true, since you always do all the actual > release work, updating yaws.hyber.org, etc. > > I think we could do a 1.90 release at any time, and I'm all for doing > one soon. There are a couple things I'm working on that I'll try to > wrap up and then we'll be ready. > > --steve Great - thx for the response! -wes |
From: Olivier G. <oli...@gm...> - 2011-04-20 19:41:34
|
Sorry for top-posting from my phone I think that, if confirmed, fixing the sendfile issue would be worth a new release :) On Wednesday, April 20, 2011, Steve Vinoski <vi...@ie...> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Claes Wikstrom <kl...@ta...> wrote: >> On 04/20/2011 06:11 PM, Wes James wrote: >>> Any ETA on 1.90 release? >>> >>> -wes >> >> Steve will have to answer this, he's the one doing all the work !! > > :-) Well, that's not entirely true, since you always do all the actual > release work, updating yaws.hyber.org, etc. > > I think we could do a 1.90 release at any time, and I'm all for doing > one soon. There are a couple things I'm working on that I'll try to > wrap up and then we'll be ready. > > --steve > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload > Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top > priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve > application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting > the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Erlyaws-list mailing list > Erl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/erlyaws-list > -- Olivier / http://biniou.net |
From: Steve V. <vi...@ie...> - 2011-04-20 21:14:58
|
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Olivier Girondel <oli...@gm...> wrote: > Sorry for top-posting from my phone > > I think that, if confirmed, fixing the sendfile issue would be worth > a new release :) I'm not really sure the problem of the sendfile driver "stealing" the file descriptor from the tcp driver is totally fixable in the present form of the code. Basically, the problem is that a file descriptor is being watched by multiple drivers, so there are bound to be cases, even if only rarely, where they run into each other. On the rare cases when this occurs, I really don't think there's any data loss, so I'm not sure it's really worth fixing in the current code. I'm fairly convinced the only way to completely prevent this scenario is to move the sendfile driver functionality into the tcp driver. I chat quite often with Tuncer on his project to move sendfile into Erlang/OTP proper, and I've already mentioned this to him. --steve |