From: John P. <jp...@bl...> - 2001-10-25 16:11:30
|
Hello All, I fully agree... registry level assignment works nicely... John ========================================================== At 09:03 AM 10/25/2001, you wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Daniel Manley [mailto:dm...@tu...] > > Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:18 AM > > To: we...@ar... > > Cc: 'epp...@li...' > > Subject: [Epp-rtk-devel] more detailed differences between > > EPP 02 and 04 > > > > > The remainder of the changes have to do with contact objects. In EPP > > 02, the registrar would supply only contact information (name, org, > > address, etc...) for a contact create request. The registry would > > return the new contact object's ROID. This would be the object > > identifier in further requests regarding that object (info, update, > > transfer, delete). Plus, this ROID would be used to associate the > > contact with domains. When creating a brand new contact, the check > > command would have no use since the registrar has no control over the > > contact's identifier. > > > > In EPP 04, the registrar must supply the contact object's identifier. > > Like a domain's and a host's name, the contact ID cannot > > already exist > > in the registry for any registrar. The registrar could > > typically use a > > DB sequence, perhaps in combination with a short form of the > > registrar's > > name to prevent collisions with other registrars. So here, > > the contact > > check command becomes very useful to avoid failed create > > commands due to > > duplicate IDs. > > i'd like to ask why this change was made. > > i thought it was better for the registry to return a unique identifier for >the contact handles that way there could NEVER be any type of conflict >between registrars. > > > >_______________________________________________ >Epp-rtk-devel mailing list >Epp...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/epp-rtk-devel |