The atomic position of the second atom doubles the first one. You have two atoms in the same position. The geometry seems to be wrong, cause -1 and 1 are the same coordinstes within the periodic lattice
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Thanks for pointing out this to me. It might be better to use the spacegroup utility to generate the atomic positions then. Any source of where I can find the Wyckoff coefficients to plug in the spacegroup.in input file?
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Dear Elio,
International tables, volume A, or some nonfree software lime Diamond.
However, as far as Iknow there is no need to know wyckoff coefs.to prepare geometry in spacegroup utility. You need only atomic coordinates of atoms in the assymetric part of the unit cell.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Dear all,
I am trying to optimize the structure of monolayer MoS2 using Elk; however I keep on getting the error:
rror(checkmt): muffin-tin radius too small for species 2 (S)
Radius : -0.5000000000E-01
Is that due to he geometry /positions of the atoms? This structure is giving me a hard time.
The input is:
tasks
2
! lattice vector optimisation while maintaining the unit cell volume
! speed the calculation up with Broyden mixing
mixtype
3
ngridk
8 8 8
avec
1.000000000 0.000000000 0.000000000
-0.500000000 0.866025400 0.000000000
0.000000000 0.000000000 6.50000000
! decrease the unit cell volume to increase the pressure
scale
5.896
latvopt
2
autoswidth
.true.
tforce
.true.
epsengy
1.e-7
epspot
1.e-6
epsforce
2.e-3
stype
0
xctype
2
rgkmax
8
gmaxvr
16
sppath
'/home_cluster/fis718/eliemouj/elk-3.0.18/species/'
atoms
2 : nspecies
'Mo.in' : spfname
1 : natoms; atpos, bfcmt below
0.00000000000 0.00000000000 0.00000000000 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00000000
'S.in' : spfname
2 : natoms; atpos, bfcmt below
0.60000000000 0.00000000000 1.000000000000 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00000000
0.60000000000 0.00000000000 -1.0000000000 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00000000
thanks in advance
Elio
University of Rondonia
Brazil
The atomic position of the second atom doubles the first one. You have two atoms in the same position. The geometry seems to be wrong, cause -1 and 1 are the same coordinstes within the periodic lattice
Dear Romaka,
Thanks for pointing out this to me. It might be better to use the spacegroup utility to generate the atomic positions then. Any source of where I can find the Wyckoff coefficients to plug in the spacegroup.in input file?
Dear Elio,
International tables, volume A, or some nonfree software lime Diamond.
However, as far as Iknow there is no need to know wyckoff coefs.to prepare geometry in spacegroup utility. You need only atomic coordinates of atoms in the assymetric part of the unit cell.