From: Tuomas K. <tuo...@mb...> - 2002-10-30 15:29:16
|
tuo...@mb... |
From: Tuomas K. <tuo...@ho...> - 2002-11-09 06:42:38
|
tuo...@ho... _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail |
From: pratish b. <erp...@ho...> - 2003-04-27 17:38:59
|
_________________________________________________________________ Taureans! See what's in store. http://server1.msn.co.in/features/taurus/index.asp Have a great year! |
From: caddo <ca...@su...> - 2003-08-13 14:51:02
|
Hi everybody, I'm running a RH9 box on a thinkpad a22m with a rage mobility 128 i'm having problems installing the install.sh installation script. It fails like this: Compiling... ERROR: Kernel modules did not compile The DRI drivers can not be installed without the latest kernel modules. Installation will be aborted. See the dri.log file for information on what went wrong. and this is the dri.log: make -f Makefile.linux DRM_MODULES=r128.o modules make[1]: Entering directory `/root/dripkg/drm' make -C /lib/modules/2.4.21/build SUBDIRS=`pwd` DRMSRCDIR=`pwd` modules make[2]: Entering directory `/root/linux-2.4.21' make -C /root/dripkg/drm CFLAGS="-D__KERNEL__ -I/root/linux-2.4.21/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno- common -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 - DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS -include /root/linux- 2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h" MAKING_MODULES=1 modules make[3]: Entering directory `/root/dripkg/drm' gcc -I/root/dripkg/drm -D__KERNEL__ -I/root/linux-2.4.21/include -Wall - Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common - fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS -include /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h - nostdinc -iwithprefix include -DKBUILD_BASENAME=r128_drv -c -o r128_drv.o r128_drv.c In file included from <command line>:1: /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:15:40: linux/modules/af_netlink.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:16:36: linux/modules/af_spx.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:19:46: linux/modules/aironet4500_card.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:22:37: linux/modules/amd7930.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:28:40: linux/modules/atyfb_base.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:47:35: linux/modules/check.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:52:38: linux/modules/com20020.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:59:35: linux/modules/cpuid.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:64:34: linux/modules/dbri.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:67:42: linux/modules/dec_and_lock.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:69:39: linux/modules/Divas_mod.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:72:39: linux/modules/eicon_mod.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:120:37: linux/modules/i2c- old.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:122:39: linux/modules/i2o_block.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:123:40: linux/modules/i2o_config.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:125:37: linux/modules/i2o_lan.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:126:37: linux/modules/i2o_pci.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:127:38: linux/modules/i2o_proc.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:128:38: linux/modules/i2o_scsi.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:150:42: linux/modules/ip_fw_compat.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:151:36: linux/modules/ip_gre.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:152:34: linux/modules/ipip.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:162:36: linux/modules/isense.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:163:33: linux/modules/iso.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:175:42: linux/modules/mach64_accel.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:176:37: linux/modules/mac_hid.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:186:39: linux/modules/microcode.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:193:36: linux/modules/mptctl.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:194:36: linux/modules/mptlan.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:195:38: linux/modules/mptscsih.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:198:35: linux/modules/msdos.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:201:33: linux/modules/msr.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:209:39: linux/modules/netfilter.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:214:41: linux/modules/nm256_audio.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:229:40: linux/modules/pci_socket.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:238:37: linux/modules/profile.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:240:33: linux/modules/pty.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:251:33: linux/modules/rtc.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:253:35: linux/modules/rwsem.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:273:36: linux/modules/sticon.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:274:37: linux/modules/sticore.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:275:35: linux/modules/stifb.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:285:38: linux/modules/tms380tr.ver: No such file or directory /root/linux-2.4.21/include/linux/modversions.h:289:38: linux/modules/uPD98402.ver: No such file or directory make[3]: *** [r128_drv.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/dripkg/drm' make[2]: *** [_mod_/root/dripkg/drm] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/linux-2.4.21' make[1]: *** [modules] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/dripkg/drm' make: *** [r128.o] Error 2 can somebody please help ma?!? i'm going crazy with this thing! thanx |
From: Geller S. <wi...@pe...> - 2003-08-13 15:43:55
|
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, caddo wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I'm running a RH9 box on a thinkpad a22m with a rage mobility 128 > i'm having problems installing the install.sh installation script. It fails > like this: > > Compiling... > ERROR: Kernel modules did not compile Seems like you don't have the kernel headers installed, or the required /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build symlink doesn't exist. Geller Sandor <wi...@pe...> |
From: <he_...@me...> - 2004-01-07 15:02:41
|
hello: mi email is he_...@me... ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. |
From: <mar...@co...> - 2004-01-17 15:24:12
|
hi when compiling the dri i get this error *** No rule to make target '/X11R6/SourceForge/Mesanew/Mesa-newtree/include/GL/gl.h' , needed by 'gl.h'. Stop. can anyone help me get rid of this error... the command i do to build dri is make World >& world.log is that correct? I also compiled and installed mesa3d - 6. |
From: Alexander S. <ale...@gm...> - 2004-01-20 03:33:38
|
the below mail from recent archives might fit to your problem and answer it. -Alex. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mc...@ru...> > To: <dri...@li...> > Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 5:42 PM > Subject: Re: [Dri-users] Cvs co compile error > > I've been told I need CVS tree from mesa, mesa3d.sf.net and to update > host.def accordingly. > > An update to the compilation guide seems appropriate now, no? > > Luis ----- Original Message ----- From: <mar...@co...> To: <dri...@li...> Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2004 4:24 PM Subject: [Dri-users] (no subject) > hi when compiling the dri i get this error *** No rule to make target '/X11R6/SourceForge/Mesanew/Mesa-newtree/include/GL/gl.h' , needed by 'gl.h'. Stop. can anyone help me get rid of this error... the command i do to build dri is make World >& world.log is that correct? I also compiled and installed mesa3d - 6. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > -- > _______________________________________________ > Dri-users mailing list > Dri...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-users > |
From: Thorsten <kne...@gm...> - 2004-12-18 16:53:36
|
thanks it works now! But I have only about 1500fps in glxgears, is that normal for that card (radeon9250 128mb)? |
From: Esben S. <b0...@es...> - 2004-12-21 14:53:23
|
Thorsten <kne...@gm...> writes: > But I have only about 1500fps in glxgears, is that normal for that card > (radeon9250 128mb)? I just got myself a radeon 9250 with 256Mio. I'll plug it in pretty soon and I'll report back. Talking of this; it would be nice to have a wiki where we could report our hardware and what we get in all the different libre benchmarks out there. Possible a tutorial on how to get all the benchmarks to benchmark and how to install them. This way we could get at the bottlenecks by seeing what other people get with similar hardware. -- Esben Stien is b0...@es... http://www.esben-stien.name irc://irc.esben-stien.name/%23contact [sip|iax]:b0...@es... |
From: Daniel C. <cd...@uo...> - 2004-12-30 00:47:16
|
Hi, I have a ATI Rage Pro and since I installed Linux I couldn't ever get a nice performance of it. I mean, for the standards, since it's a Rage Pro after all. :P A time ago I used GATOS but now that I'm back to Linux its development is apparently over, so is UTAH-GLX's. Then I'm trying to install DRI and Mesa according to the DRI building guide. I ignored the X.org part because I already had it, in the 6.8.1 version. I don't really know if I should do that. But anyway, now I installed the DRI and Mesa and everything seems nice but when I do a "xdriinfo", I get something like "extension XFree86-DRI missing on display ':0.0'". On the output of my X.org.0.log, everything sounds OK, though: (II) LoadModule: "glx" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.a (II) Module glx: vendor=3D"X.Org Foundation" compiled for 6.8.1, module version =3D 1.0.0 ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.2 (II) Loading sub module "GLcore" (II) LoadModule: "GLcore" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a (II) Module GLcore: vendor=3D"X.Org Foundation" compiled for 6.8.1, module version =3D 1.0.0 ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.2 (II) Loading extension GLX (II) LoadModule: "dri" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libdri.a (II) Module dri: vendor=3D"X.Org Foundation" compiled for 6.8.1, module version =3D 1.0.0 ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.2 (II) Loading sub module "drm" (II) LoadModule: "drm" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/linux/libdrm.a (II) Module drm: vendor=3D"X.Org Foundation" compiled for 6.8.1, module version =3D 1.0.0 ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.2 (II) Loading extension XFree86-DRI (II) LoadModule: "ati" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/ati_drv.o (II) Module ati: vendor=3D"X.Org Foundation" compiled for 6.8.1, module version =3D 6.5.6 Module class: X.Org Video Driver ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 0.7 I really would like some help here, I don't know if I finally got 3D support for my video card or if I did right. Grateful, Daniel Coradi=0A =0A___________________________________________= _______________________________=0AAcabe com aquelas janelinhas que pulam = na sua tela.=0AAntiPop-up UOL - =C9 gr=E1tis!=0Ahttp://antipopup.uol.com.= br/=0A |
From: Adam J. <aj...@nw...> - 2004-12-30 00:51:56
|
On Wednesday 29 December 2004 19:42, Daniel Coradi wrote: > I really would like some help here, I > don't know if I finally got 3D support > for my video card or if I did right. Rebuild Xorg with #define BuildDevelDRIDrivers YES in config/cf/host.def. Xorg doesn't have DRI support for the mach64 by=20 default because the driver is insecure. =2D ajax |
From: Thorsten <kne...@gm...> - 2005-02-01 19:54:32
|
I get a bash-2.05b$ glxinfo name of display: :0.0 libGL warning: 3D driver returned no fbconfigs. libGL error: InitDriver failed libGL error: reverting to (slow) indirect rendering display: :0 screen: 0 direct rendering: No with new snapshots. what did I wrong? thx |
From: Felix <fx...@gm...> - 2005-02-01 21:41:11
|
Am Dienstag, den 01.02.2005, 20:55 +0100 schrieb Thorsten: > I get a >=20 >=20 > bash-2.05b$ glxinfo > name of display: :0.0 > libGL warning: 3D driver returned no fbconfigs. > libGL error: InitDriver failed > libGL error: reverting to (slow) indirect rendering > display: :0 screen: 0 > direct rendering: No > >=20 > with new snapshots. >=20 > what did I wrong? Can't tell without a little more information. Which driver are you testing? What do you get if you "export LIBGL_DEBUG=3Dverbose" before running glxinfo? >=20 > thx >=20 --=20 | Felix K=FChling <fx...@gm...> http://fxk.de.vu | | PGP Fingerprint: 6A3C 9566 5B30 DDED 73C3 B152 151C 5CC1 D888 E595 | |
From: Felix <fx...@gm...> - 2005-02-02 13:28:08
|
Am Dienstag, den 01.02.2005, 23:24 +0100 schrieb Thorsten: > On Tuesday 01 February 2005 22:43, you wrote: > > Am Dienstag, den 01.02.2005, 20:55 +0100 schrieb Thorsten: > > > I get a > > > > > > > > > bash-2.05b$ glxinfo > > > name of display: :0.0 > > > libGL warning: 3D driver returned no fbconfigs. > > > libGL error: InitDriver failed > > > libGL error: reverting to (slow) indirect rendering > > > display: :0 screen: 0 > > > direct rendering: No > > > > > > > > > with new snapshots. > > > > > > what did I wrong? > > > > Can't tell without a little more information. Which driver are you > > testing? What do you get if you "export LIBGL_DEBUG=3Dverbose" before > > running glxinfo? > > > > > thx > bash-2.05b$ export LIBGL_DEBUG=3Dverbose > bash-2.05b$ glxinfo > name of display: :0.0 > display: :0 screen: 0 > direct rendering: No > server glx vendor string: Brian Paul > server glx version string: 1.4 Mesa 6.2.1 > server glx extensions: > GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer, GLX_MESA_pixmap_colormap, > GLX_MESA_release_buffers, GLX_ARB_get_proc_address, GLX_EXT_visual_in= fo, > GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_SGI_video_sync, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, > GLX_SGIX_pbuffer > client glx vendor string: Brian Paul > client glx version string: 1.4 Mesa 6.2.1 > client glx extensions: > GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer, GLX_MESA_pixmap_colormap, > GLX_MESA_release_buffers, GLX_ARB_get_proc_address, GLX_EXT_visual_in= fo, > GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_SGI_video_sync, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, > GLX_SGIX_pbuffer > GLX extensions: > GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer, GLX_MESA_pixmap_colormap, > GLX_MESA_release_buffers, GLX_ARB_get_proc_address, GLX_EXT_visual_in= fo, > GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_SGI_video_sync, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, > GLX_SGIX_pbuffer > OpenGL vendor string: Brian Paul > OpenGL renderer string: Mesa X11 > OpenGL version string: 1.5 Mesa 6.2.1 > OpenGL extensions: > GL_ARB_depth_texture, GL_ARB_fragment_program, GL_ARB_imaging, > GL_ARB_multisample, GL_ARB_multitexture, GL_ARB_occlusion_query, > GL_ARB_point_parameters, GL_ARB_point_sprite, GL_ARB_shadow, > GL_ARB_shadow_ambient, GL_ARB_texture_border_clamp, > GL_ARB_texture_compression, GL_ARB_texture_cube_map, > GL_ARB_texture_env_add, GL_ARB_texture_env_combine, > GL_ARB_texture_env_crossbar, GL_ARB_texture_env_dot3, > GL_ARB_texture_mirrored_repeat, GL_ARB_texture_non_power_of_two, > GL_ARB_texture_rectangle, GL_ARB_transpose_matrix, > GL_ARB_vertex_buffer_object, GL_ARB_vertex_program, GL_ARB_window_pos= , > GL_EXT_abgr, GL_EXT_bgra, GL_EXT_blend_color, > GL_EXT_blend_equation_separate, GL_EXT_blend_func_separate, > GL_EXT_blend_logic_op, GL_EXT_blend_minmax, GL_EXT_blend_subtract, > GL_EXT_clip_volume_hint, GL_EXT_compiled_vertex_array, GL_EXT_convolu= tion, > GL_EXT_copy_texture, GL_EXT_depth_bounds_test, GL_EXT_draw_range_elem= ents, > GL_EXT_fog_coord, GL_EXT_histogram, GL_EXT_multi_draw_arrays, > GL_EXT_packed_pixels, GL_EXT_paletted_texture, GL_EXT_pixel_buffer_ob= ject, > GL_EXT_point_parameters, GL_EXT_polygon_offset, GL_EXT_rescale_normal= , > GL_EXT_secondary_color, GL_EXT_separate_specular_color, > GL_EXT_shadow_funcs, GL_EXT_shared_texture_palette, > GL_EXT_stencil_two_side, GL_EXT_stencil_wrap, GL_EXT_subtexture, > GL_EXT_texture, GL_EXT_texture3D, GL_EXT_texture_edge_clamp, > GL_EXT_texture_env_add, GL_EXT_texture_env_combine, > GL_EXT_texture_env_dot3, GL_EXT_texture_lod_bias, > GL_EXT_texture_mirror_clamp, GL_EXT_texture_object, > GL_EXT_texture_rectangle, GL_EXT_vertex_array, GL_APPLE_packed_pixels= , > GL_ATI_blend_equation_separate, GL_ATI_texture_env_combine3, > GL_ATI_texture_mirror_once, GL_HP_occlusion_test, > GL_IBM_multimode_draw_arrays, GL_IBM_rasterpos_clip, > GL_IBM_texture_mirrored_repeat, GL_INGR_blend_func_separate, > GL_MESA_pack_invert, GL_MESA_program_debug, GL_MESA_resize_buffers, > GL_MESA_ycbcr_texture, GL_MESA_window_pos, GL_NV_blend_square, > GL_NV_fragment_program, GL_NV_light_max_exponent, GL_NV_point_sprite, > GL_NV_texture_rectangle, GL_NV_texgen_reflection, GL_NV_vertex_progra= m, > GL_NV_vertex_program1_1, GL_SGI_color_matrix, GL_SGI_color_table, > GL_SGI_texture_color_table, GL_SGIS_generate_mipmap, > GL_SGIS_pixel_texture, GL_SGIS_texture_border_clamp, > GL_SGIS_texture_edge_clamp, GL_SGIS_texture_lod, GL_SGIX_depth_textur= e, > GL_SGIX_pixel_texture, GL_SGIX_shadow, GL_SGIX_shadow_ambient, > GL_SUN_multi_draw_arrays > glu version: 1.3 > glu extensions: > GLU_EXT_nurbs_tessellator, GLU_EXT_object_space_tess >=20 > visual x bf lv rg d st colorbuffer ax dp st accumbuffer ms cav > id dep cl sp sz l ci b ro r g b a bf th cl r g b a ns b eat > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > 0x23 16 tc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 0 0 0 None > 0x24 16 tc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None > 0x25 16 tc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None > 0x26 16 tc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None > 0x27 16 tc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None > 0x28 16 tc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None > 0x29 16 tc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None > 0x2a 16 tc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None > 0x2b 16 dc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None > 0x2c 16 dc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None > 0x2d 16 dc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None > 0x2e 16 dc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None > 0x2f 16 dc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None > 0x30 16 dc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None > 0x31 16 dc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None > 0x32 16 dc 0 16 0 r y . 5 6 5 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None > bash-2.05b$ =20 >=20 I'm confused. This one should display the same error messages as you got before. But it doesn't. This time it looks like it's using a standalone Mesa library. It doesn't even try to load a DRI driver. Which distribution are you using? Also, what does "ldd `which glxinfo`" say? >=20 > I use the radeon driver. >=20 > thx >=20 Let's keep this on the mailing list. --=20 | Felix K=FChling <fx...@gm...> http://fxk.de.vu | | PGP Fingerprint: 6A3C 9566 5B30 DDED 73C3 B152 151C 5CC1 D888 E595 | |
From: Felix <fx...@gm...> - 2005-02-02 14:48:15
|
Am Mittwoch, den 02.02.2005, 15:31 +0100 schrieb Thorsten: > On Wednesday 02 February 2005 14:30, you wrote: [snip] > > I'm confused. This one should display the same error messages as you go= t > > before. But it doesn't. This time it looks like it's using a standalone > > Mesa library. It doesn't even try to load a DRI driver. > > > > Which distribution are you using? Also, what does "ldd `which glxinfo`" > > say? > > > > > I use the radeon driver. > > > > > > thx > > > > Let's keep this on the mailing list >=20 > Ok, >=20 > that was my fault, I have updated de mesa-stuff and now all is broken. > At the moment I test the driver from ATI-direct, could play hl2 with it, = but=20 > extremely bad performance. On what hardware? The ATI binary driver only works with Radeon 8500 and later. That would mean you need a r200 snapshot. You mentioned the radeon snapshot before, didn't you? >=20 > Is it possible to play hl2 with the dri drivers? Don't know. >=20 > And how should I update dri, must I install a new mesa-driver, is it ok i= f I=20 > only install the snapshots (common + radeon)? >=20 > Or must I update all inclusive xorg? If you have Xorg 6.8 installed already, then the snapshots should be sufficient. But make sure that you get rid of all components of the ATI binary driver first. If you have a Radeon 8500 or newer then you need the r200 snapshot, not the radeon one. >=20 >=20 > thx Thorsten > =20 >=20 --=20 | Felix K=FChling <fx...@gm...> http://fxk.de.vu | | PGP Fingerprint: 6A3C 9566 5B30 DDED 73C3 B152 151C 5CC1 D888 E595 | |
From: Thorsten <kne...@gm...> - 2005-02-02 14:52:13
|
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 15:50, you wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 02.02.2005, 15:31 +0100 schrieb Thorsten: > > On Wednesday 02 February 2005 14:30, you wrote: > > [snip] > > > > I'm confused. This one should display the same error messages as you > > > got before. But it doesn't. This time it looks like it's using a > > > standalone Mesa library. It doesn't even try to load a DRI driver. > > > > > > Which distribution are you using? Also, what does "ldd `which glxinfo`" > > > say? > > > > > > > I use the radeon driver. > > > > > > > > thx > > > > > > Let's keep this on the mailing list > > > > Ok, > > > > that was my fault, I have updated de mesa-stuff and now all is broken. > > At the moment I test the driver from ATI-direct, could play hl2 with it, > > but extremely bad performance. > > On what hardware? The ATI binary driver only works with Radeon 8500 and > later. That would mean you need a r200 snapshot. You mentioned the > radeon snapshot before, didn't you? > Yes, its a 9250 > > Is it possible to play hl2 with the dri drivers? > > Don't know. > > > And how should I update dri, must I install a new mesa-driver, is it ok > > if I only install the snapshots (common + radeon)? > > > > Or must I update all inclusive xorg? > > If you have Xorg 6.8 installed already, then the snapshots should be > sufficient. But make sure that you get rid of all components of the ATI > binary driver first. If you have a Radeon 8500 or newer then you need > the r200 snapshot, not the radeon one. > Oh, how stupid, I think this was the problem. I will try it later again. thanks for your help. Thorsten > > thx Thorsten |
From: Thorsten K. <t....@st...> - 2005-02-01 18:15:29
|
I get a bash-2.05b$ glxinfo name of display: :0.0 libGL warning: 3D driver returned no fbconfigs. libGL error: InitDriver failed libGL error: reverting to (slow) indirect rendering display: :0 screen: 0 direct rendering: No with new snapshots. what did I wrong? thx |
From: Randy P. <ran...@gm...> - 2005-03-26 01:04:01
|
Hi, I'm new on this list, though I've read a bit of the archives. I'm having trouble getting direct rendering enabled. I had it enabled in October, however since then I've upgraded everything but my video card. The earliest point where I can find a failure report is in Xorg.0.log: (EE) RADEON(0): [drm] Failed to map vertex/indirect buffers list The only references I've been able to find (via Google) to the above error is in the source files. I'm wondering if it's DMA related? (just a shot in the dark) Hardware is ASUS K8V-X, ATI Radeon 9200 5961 (AGP). Software is FreeBSD 6-current, xorg 6.8.2, dri 6.2.1 (both from ports) Files: http://www.cloudfactory.org/~randy/radeon/dmesg.boot http://www.cloudfactory.org/~randy/radeon/xorg.conf http://www.cloudfactory.org/~randy/radeon/Xorg.0.log http://www.cloudfactory.org/~randy/radeon/glxinfo.txt In xorg.conf, I've tested with xorg drivers ati and radeon, and I've got Section "Module", Load "dri", Load "glx", and Section "DRI", Mode 0666 dmesg indicates: agp0: <VIA 8385 host to PCI bridge> mem 0xe0000000-0xefffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 drm0: <ATI Radeon RV280 9200 SE> port 0xa000-0xa0ff mem 0xd0000000-0xd7ffffff,0xfc200000-0xfc20ffff irq 11 at device 0.0 on pci1 info: [drm] AGP at 0xe0000000 256MB info: [drm] Initialized radeon 1.11.0 20020828 on minor 0 info: [drm] Loading R200 Microcode other devices share irq 11: pci_link0: <ACPI PCI Link LNKA> irq 11 on acpi0 uhci0: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> port 0xb800-0xb81f irq 11 at device 16.0 on pci0 uhci1: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> port 0xc000-0xc01f irq 11 at device 16.1 on pci0 Section I think is relevant from Xorg.0.log: (II) RADEON(0): X context handle = 0x00000001 (II) RADEON(0): [drm] installed DRM signal handler (II) RADEON(0): [DRI] installation complete (II) RADEON(0): [drm] Added 32 65536 byte vertex/indirect buffers (EE) RADEON(0): [drm] Failed to map vertex/indirect buffers list (II) RADEON(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context for kernel (II) RADEON(0): [drm] unmapping 8192 bytes of SAREA 0xc2c7c000 at 0x283d0000 (II) RADEON(0): Render acceleration enabled (II) RADEON(0): Direct rendering disabled I've fiddled with the BIOS a bit, and I moved my 3ware RAID and SCSI cards over a slot to reduce IRQ sharing with the Radeon. One thing I haven't tried yet is compiling a new kernel without USB support, or giving device.hints for USB to use different IRQ. I've also considered hinting at specific DMA, but haven't tried that yet. I've tried the troubleshooting listed at http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/DriTroubleshooting and http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/troubleshooting.html -- Randy Primeaux http://www.cloudfactory.org/~randy |
From: <al...@ft...> - 2006-06-15 14:15:21
|
Good day! I have a: 00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation 82852/855GM Integrated Graphics Device (rev 02) on kernel 2.6.16.16, so I downloaded your last snapshot (i915-20060403-linux.i386.tar.bz2), it compiles and installs well but... modprobe -i i915 WARNING: Error inserting drm (/lib/modules/2.6.16-my/kernel/drivers/char/drm/drm.ko): Invalid module format FATAL: Error inserting i915 (/lib/modules/2.6.16-my/kernel/drivers/char/drm/i915.ko): Unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg) dmesg: drm: exports duplicate symbol drm_get_resource_start (owned by kernel) i915: Unknown symbol drm_cleanup_pci where is problem? -- al...@ft... -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Accessible with your email software or over the web |
From: Alan C. <al...@ch...> - 2006-08-07 10:25:10
|
I am planning on building myself a new computer from scratch, probably based on the new Intel Core 2 Duo chips, and am seeking opinions on the best graphics chipset/card that I should use. Basic criteria are as follows 1) Must be open source driver (under linux) 2) Some 3D capability - but not necessarily the fastest, but expect to run the following in the future (not particularly tried any of these yet) - Flight Gear - Blender - KDE4 I currently am running a Gigabyte Radeon 9200 - which seems just about ideal as it has the R200 chipset which seems fully supported. I would have liked to carry it over to my new machine. Unfortunately a) It has an AGP interface - newer motherboards seem to be PCI-E b) My favoured Hardware Supplier (http://www.dabs.com) don't seem to stock any graphics cards with this chipset as its far too old. My current exploration around this subject doesn't seem to get a very clear opinion. Most reviews seem to concentrate on ATI or Nvidia chipsets, with the requirement that I would then have to choose the binary drivers from these two manufactures. This is something I would like to avoid. Looking for alternatives at the dri web site, the chipsets with full support, mainly seem to be the older ones, with possibly Intel and Matrox offerings. Not sure I understand the detail - but this seems to mean a motherboard with an intel chipset, or the get a Matrox G5500 separate card. What are don't really know is will these be sufficiently useable. What can this list advise? -- Alan Chandler al...@ch... |
From: Mikko J R. <mjr...@cc...> - 2006-08-07 12:32:39
|
On ma, 2006-08-07 at 11:25 +0100, Alan Chandler wrote: > I am planning on building myself a new computer from scratch, probably based > on the new Intel Core 2 Duo chips, and am seeking opinions on the best > graphics chipset/card that I should use. Basic criteria are as follows > > 1) Must be open source driver (under linux) This, along with the rest of the specs, basically means Intel integrated graphics. So if you can find an MB with one of those (the later 945/950 models probably), you should be pretty well off, especially since you go on to say that you don't require the fastest 3d around. > 2) Some 3D capability - but not necessarily the fastest, but expect to run > the following in the future (not particularly tried any of these yet) > - Flight Gear I bought myself a Radeon x800 (that PCI-E dilemma and all, plus I went with AMD64x2 so couldn't really get an Intel). Some applications work fine with the r300 DRI, others easily crash and take the whole box with them. Particularly, with the X.org DRI version shipped with Dapper Drake, Flight Gear crashed my box conveniently when I crashed my plane. Of course, some progress has probably been made on the r300 DRI since then; I'm just relaying my experience. Haven't bothered to try later releases, since I'm not really into FG anyway. Still, the r300 development seems encouraging, and if you can't go with Intel, a <=x850 Radeon would probably be the only way to go, but you would have to be prepared to deal with the occasional driver problem. Do not go with Matrox. Free support is available only for their obsolete models, and even their proprietary support is the worst of the three from what I've heard. I'm not holding my breath, but I do wish ATI would become a bit more cooperative since the acquisition... The free software community could use another (GPU-wise) friendly manufacturer besides Intel. Meanwhile, this _is_ another reason to go with Intel, rewarding them for their stance in this particular matter (or at least not rewarding the others for theirs). Hope this helps. -- Mikko J Rauhala <mjr...@cc...> University of Helsinki |
From: Roland S. <rsc...@hi...> - 2006-08-07 17:00:24
|
Alan Chandler wrote: > I am planning on building myself a new computer from scratch, > probably based on the new Intel Core 2 Duo chips, and am seeking > opinions on the best graphics chipset/card that I should use. Basic > criteria are as follows > > 1) Must be open source driver (under linux) 2) Some 3D capability - > but not necessarily the fastest, but expect to run the following in > the future (not particularly tried any of these yet) - Flight Gear - > Blender - KDE4 > > I currently am running a Gigabyte Radeon 9200 - which seems just > about ideal as it has the R200 chipset which seems fully supported. I > would have liked to carry it over to my new machine. Unfortunately > a) It has an AGP interface - newer motherboards seem to be PCI-E b) > My favoured Hardware Supplier (http://www.dabs.com) don't seem to > stock any graphics cards with this chipset as its far too old. You still can get cards with that chip (though they got slightly slower and instead a higher model number as compensation (9250) ... but they don't exist as pci-e cards. (You could get a pci card with that chip but I wouldn't recommend it at this time, usually those are only the 64bit SE cards which are only half as fast.) > My current exploration around this subject doesn't seem to get a very > clear opinion. Most reviews seem to concentrate on ATI or Nvidia > chipsets, with the requirement that I would then have to choose the > binary drivers from these two manufactures. This is something I > would like to avoid. There is an open-source driver for all radeon r300 based cards (up to x850, with the exception of the r300-based igps) though it might not run everything, and sometimes it might be slow. There is also an open-source driver project for nvidia cards but nothing works yet. > Looking for alternatives at the dri web site, the chipsets with full > support, mainly seem to be the older ones, with possibly Intel and > Matrox offerings. Not sure I understand the detail - but this seems > to mean a motherboard with an intel chipset, or the get a Matrox > G5500 separate card. What are don't really know is will these be > sufficiently useable. > > What can this list advise? Intel IGP seems to be one of the best supported (by open-source drivers) graphic chipset (if not the best), though the driver lacks some performance-enhancing features (like zone based rendering) making it even slower than it already is. There will supposedly be open-source support for the new g965 chipset (which rumours say got delayed due to misrendering because of chip bugs) which is very flexible on paper but rumours say is actually slower than the older ones. The other new IGP chipsets (q965, q963) could be another option, as they seem to be just higher-clocked versions of the old gma950, but again there aren't any reviews or drivers yet. Though on paper that g965 looks really tempting... it should be out in some weeks. Roland |
From: Nathan H. <na...@ma...> - 2001-02-16 15:55:40
|
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 01:52:06PM -0000, Tim Ince wrote: > hi > I'm trying to get an NVIDIA TNT graphics card working with DRI using 2.4.1 > kernel and latest download of DRI. i'm testing it without actually > installing it. I assume i need to use NVIDIA's own drivers but i get some > errors in my XFree86 log file. Being rather new to linux i have no idea how > to correct them and would appreciate any help you can give me There is no Mesa/DRI support for NVIDIA cards. Contact NVIDIA for support. -- The more I know about the WIN32 API the more I dislike it. It is complex and for the most part poorly designed, inconsistent, and poorly documented. - David Korn |
From: James C. <jim...@mi...> - 2001-02-16 20:58:11
|
On 16 Feb 2001 13:52:06 +0000, Tim Ince wrote: > hi > I'm trying to get an NVIDIA TNT graphics card working with DRI using 2.4.1 > kernel and latest download of DRI. i'm testing it without actually > installing it. I assume i need to use NVIDIA's own drivers but i get some > errors in my XFree86 log file. Being rather new to linux i have no idea how > to correct them and would appreciate any help you can give me > Take a look at the NVIDIA drivers page. There is a howto on installing using their driver. If you are using kernel 2.4.1 on a redhat system you will need to: rpm --rebuild NVIDIA_kernel-0.9-6.src.rpm and then install the rpm that is created: rpm -Uvh /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/NVIDIA_kernel-0.9-6.rpm Again read their docs for installing and setup. Take special care to make sure that there are no Mesa libraries in /usr/lib/ I switched to using kernel 2.4.1/xfree 4.02/DRI/ATI Radeon 64MB as I found that the NVIDIA drivers locked my box alot. This new combination doesnt have as good of framerate but its nice to have opensource drivers that dont lock my box. Jim |