From: Bruce S. <br...@ar...> - 2007-11-27 14:33:28
|
Is there anything special that needs to be done to upgrade patch-o-matic-ng? I updated the src: patch-o-matic-ng-20071125.tar.bz2. Is there anything else that needs to be done? (DL 1.3) I was having a problem with iptables and Apache/PHP, and updated libnetfilter_conntrack, php, and patch-o-matic-ng to the latest. While it was compiling, I figured out the real problem, which is NOT related to anything in DL (long story). If the compile completes, should I upload all three updates anyway? - BS |
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2007-11-27 14:41:26
|
On Tue, November 27, 2007 08:34, Bruce Smith wrote: > Is there anything special that needs to be done to upgrade > patch-o-matic-ng? I updated the src: patch-o-matic-ng-20071125.tar.bz2. Is > there anything else that needs to be done? (DL 1.3) > > I was having a problem with iptables and Apache/PHP, and updated > libnetfilter_conntrack, php, and patch-o-matic-ng to the latest. > > While it was compiling, I figured out the real problem, which is NOT > related to anything in DL (long story). > > If the compile completes, should I upload all three updates anyway? Unfortunately they keep removing patches from patch-o-matic-ng , once they make it into the mainstream 2.6 kernel. Compare the new and the old patch, they probably removed a lot we want in there. Worst case you need to extract the missing old patches and put them into the src/pom-addon folder. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2007-11-27 15:00:31
|
> > Is there anything special that needs to be done to upgrade > > patch-o-matic-ng? I updated the src: patch-o-matic-ng-20071125.tar.bz2. Is > > there anything else that needs to be done? (DL 1.3) > > > > I was having a problem with iptables and Apache/PHP, and updated > > libnetfilter_conntrack, php, and patch-o-matic-ng to the latest. > > > > While it was compiling, I figured out the real problem, which is NOT > > related to anything in DL (long story). > > > > If the compile completes, should I upload all three updates anyway? > > Unfortunately they keep removing patches from patch-o-matic-ng , once they > make it into the mainstream 2.6 kernel. But I'm only doing this on DL 1.3 w/2.6 kernel. > Compare the new and the old patch, they probably removed a lot we want > in there. > Worst case you need to extract the missing old patches and put them into > the src/pom-addon folder. Even in DL 1.3? - BS |
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2007-11-27 17:22:21
|
On Tue, November 27, 2007 08:53, Bruce Smith wrote: >>> Is there anything special that needs to be done to upgrade >>> patch-o-matic-ng? I updated the src: >>> patch-o-matic-ng-20071125.tar.bz2. Is there anything else that needs >>> to be done? (DL 1.3) >>> >>> I was having a problem with iptables and Apache/PHP, and updated >>> libnetfilter_conntrack, php, and patch-o-matic-ng to the latest. >>> >>> While it was compiling, I figured out the real problem, which is NOT >>> related to anything in DL (long story). >>> >>> If the compile completes, should I upload all three updates anyway? >>> >> >> Unfortunately they keep removing patches from patch-o-matic-ng , once >> they make it into the mainstream 2.6 kernel. > > But I'm only doing this on DL 1.3 w/2.6 kernel. > > >> Compare the new and the old patch, they probably removed a lot we want >> in there. Worst case you need to extract the missing old patches and put >> them into the src/pom-addon folder. > > Even in DL 1.3? Oh no, you can upgrade patch-o-matic-ng in 1.3. Since we're already on the latest kernel it is not a problem. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2007-11-27 18:14:14
|
> >> Compare the new and the old patch, they probably removed a lot we want > >> in there. Worst case you need to extract the missing old patches and put > >> them into the src/pom-addon folder. > > > > Even in DL 1.3? > > Oh no, you can upgrade patch-o-matic-ng in 1.3. > Since we're already on the latest kernel it is not a problem. I compared the two, and they are exactly the same, even though the bz2 files are different sizes (weird - I guess they used a different compression option on bzip2). - BS |