I WONDER if the DevC++ compiler was updated silently... I do not remember having such problem but now I persistently get the same error message showing no matches then showing the correct candidates matching the written code...
I use an ad hoc makefile for the project, so the IDE is no good to set compiling switches. Would there be a combination of switches that makes the compiler lose sight of the declarations and not find what it has under the nose?
I would like a quick solution to avoid spending time experimenting with switch combinations.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I WONDER if the DevC++ compiler was updated silently... I do not remember having such problem but now I persistently get the same error message showing no matches then showing the correct candidates matching the written code...
I use an ad hoc makefile for the project, so the IDE is no good to set compiling switches. Would there be a combination of switches that makes the compiler lose sight of the declarations and not find what it has under the nose?
I would like a quick solution to avoid spending time experimenting with switch combinations.
I am using templates and pointer to member functions, but problem is in temporary objects and copy constructors.