lock-free collections would be interesting, but depend on specific atomic
operations that may or may not be supported on a given target platform.
If the entire effort can be done in a set of code that impliments lock-free
methods where appropriate atomic support operations are found for the
target platform (such as through an autoconf test), and substitutes locked
methods are used for those targets which lack appropriate operations, so
that basic code portability is maintained accross all platforms, then yes, I
would be very interested.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Logged In: YES
user_id=217
I will have to look at this a bit later this month once time
frees up again.
Logged In: YES
user_id=572001
Are you interested in more news?
- http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~noble/
- http://groups.google.de/groups?threadm=YVyfd.10491%
24HA.550%
40attbi_s01&group=comp.programming.threads
- http://www.open-
std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2004/n1687.pdf
Logged In: YES
user_id=217
lock-free collections would be interesting, but depend on specific atomic
operations that may or may not be supported on a given target platform.
If the entire effort can be done in a set of code that impliments lock-free
methods where appropriate atomic support operations are found for the
target platform (such as through an autoconf test), and substitutes locked
methods are used for those targets which lack appropriate operations, so
that basic code portability is maintained accross all platforms, then yes, I
would be very interested.
Logged In: YES
user_id=572001
Is the software "http://www.noble-library.org/" a good
candidate for your interest?