Menu

#154 COTV adds 5900 to the port number.

open
nobody
None
5
2005-09-24
2005-09-24
Anonymous
No

COTV adds 5900 to the port number you specify. If you attempt to
connect to port 0, it will connect to 5900.
In order for me to connect to port 26000, I must specify 20100.

Discussion

  • Nobody/Anonymous

    Logged In: NO

    yeah, i got this problem too... silly.

     
  • Anonymous

    Anonymous - 2005-10-14

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=108160

    The number you enter is not a port number; it's a display
    number. VNC protocol specifies that port number = 5900 +
    display number.

    Now one could argue (and I'd agree) that we should be
    entering a port number.

    When I first started using cotvnc, I was stymied by the
    "display number" thing, and couldn't get it to work until I
    read the wording of the dialog very carefully. It does in
    fact tell you...

    --johnt

     
  • Stewart Midwinter

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=190543

    that's not a bug, that's a feature! :-)

     
  • Phillip Mocek

    Phillip Mocek - 2006-01-16

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=41814

    This behavior seems to have originated with version 20b3. I
    previously specified a port number (because I'm connecting
    to a local port which is ssh-tunneled to the remote server
    running Xvnc) with 20b1 and with 20b2.

    Note that previous versions had a "display/port" field,
    while 20b3 has a "display" field.

     
  • Phillip Mocek

    Phillip Mocek - 2006-01-16

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=41814

    If this is intended behavior, then the format of server
    connection configuration data has changed since version
    2.0b2, and the bug is that cotvnc does not recognize
    obsolete configuration data and deal appropriately with it.

    see also: bug 1407743 - saved "display/port" data used as
    "display" after upgrade

     
  • Nobody/Anonymous

    Logged In: NO

    This did not happen for me in version 2.0b3, but I just
    upgraded to the universal version for my MacbookPro, and
    discovered it. So it is still a problem

     
  • Jason Harris

    Jason Harris - 2006-02-27

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=351330

    Version 2.0b4 fixes this by changing the behavior. If you enter a _port_ using
    host:port syntax, it will be used. If you enter a _display_ in the text field marked
    "Display:", it will be used and 5900 will be added to it.

    So, either enter "yourhost:5900" _or_ enter display 0.

     
  • Nobody/Anonymous

    Logged In: NO

    This makes it impossible to connect to a port <5900

     

Log in to post a comment.