From: Ken P. <ke...@gm...> - 2013-03-04 09:59:01
|
Hi Henry, It's been almost two years since the last release v0.7.9, there is no any further changes to colinux code, what's happened? Are you still working on this project now? -- perl -e 'print unpack(u,"62V5N\"FME;G\!E<FQ`9VUA:6PN8V]M\"\@`` ")' |
From: Alexander K. <Alexander@Kriegisch.name> - 2013-03-04 10:46:47
|
Good question. I love coLinux (and also andLinux which is based on coLinux). I would be happy to see further development. But I also know that talk is cheap. If I had the necessary abilities, I would contribute more than just writing the occasional forum article about how to tweak the configuration in certain respects. Alexander Kriegisch Am 04.03.2013 um 10:58 schrieb Ken Perl <ke...@gm...>: > Hi Henry, > > It's been almost two years since the last release v0.7.9, there is no > any further changes to colinux code, what's happened? > > Are you still working on this project now? > > -- > perl -e 'print unpack(u,"62V5N\"FME;G\!E<FQ`9VUA:6PN8V]M\"\@`` > ")' > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb > _______________________________________________ > coLinux-users mailing list > coL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-users |
From: 林嘉(程二 福. <li...@ru...> - 2013-03-04 12:43:47
|
I am waiting for the x64 version of Colinux, well.... -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Ken Perl [mailto:ke...@gm...] 发送时间: 2013年3月4日 17:59 收件人: col...@li... 主题: [coLinux-users] colinux development suspended? Hi Henry, It's been almost two years since the last release v0.7.9, there is no any further changes to colinux code, what's happened? Are you still working on this project now? -- perl -e 'print unpack(u,"62V5N\"FME;G\!E<FQ`9VUA:6PN8V]M\"\@`` ")' ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ coLinux-users mailing list coL...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-users |
From: colinux <co...@ov...> - 2013-03-04 14:20:34
|
The last update of development code goes back to May of 2012. I think we are looking at an abandoned project. How do you get a new maintainer? $ svn log --verbose --limit 10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r1598 | sunyin | 2012-05-31 08:24:52 +0200 (Thu, 31 May 2012) | 1 line Changed paths: M /branches/devel/bin/build-kernel.sh use bash instead of general sh On 3/4/2013 1:30 PM, 林嘉(程二 福州) wrote: > I am waiting for the x64 version of Colinux, well.... > > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: Ken Perl [mailto:ke...@gm...] > 发送时间: 2013年3月4日 17:59 > 收件人: col...@li... > 主题: [coLinux-users] colinux development suspended? > > Hi Henry, > > It's been almost two years since the last release v0.7.9, there is no any further changes to colinux code, what's happened? > > Are you still working on this project now? > > -- > perl -e 'print unpack(u,"62V5N\"FME;G\!E<FQ`9VUA:6PN8V]M\"\@`` > ")' > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb > _______________________________________________ > coLinux-users mailing list > coL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb > _______________________________________________ > coLinux-users mailing list > coL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-users |
From: H. N. <hen...@ar...> - 2013-03-04 22:01:21
|
Hello, everybody can contribute code. I would add every patches, if some one would send it. But the real problem is, that hard hacking the Linux kernel is not the top of the most developers. CoLinux was designed for long time for small hardware, and at a time where no other virtualization was available for free. For now we have better and faster computers, we have hardware virtualization support, and we have VirtualBox for free. This all makes not necessary to go so deep into kernel. Henry co...@ov... wrote: > The last update of development code goes back to May of 2012. I think we > are looking at an abandoned project. How do you get a new maintainer? > > $ svn log --verbose --limit 10 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r1598 | sunyin | 2012-05-31 08:24:52 +0200 (Thu, 31 May 2012) | 1 line > Changed paths: > M /branches/devel/bin/build-kernel.sh > > use bash instead of general sh > > On 3/4/2013 1:30 PM, ??(?? ??) wrote: > > I am waiting for the x64 version of Colinux, well.... > > > > -----????----- > > ???: Ken Perl [mailto:ke...@gm...] > > ????: 2013?3?4? 17:59 > > ???: col...@li... > > ??: [coLinux-users] colinux development suspended? > > > > Hi Henry, > > > > It's been almost two years since the last release v0.7.9, there is no any > further changes to colinux code, what's happened? > > > > Are you still working on this project now? > > > > -- > > perl -e 'print unpack(u,"62V5N\"FME;G\!E<FQ`9VUA:6PN8V]M\"\@`` > > ")' -- Ads by Arcor --------------------------------------------------------- |
From: Vincent R. <vin...@fr...> - 2013-03-04 23:05:58
|
On 04/03/2013 23:01, H. Nestler wrote: > CoLinux was designed for long time for small hardware, and at a time > where no other virtualization was available for free. For now we have > better and faster computers, we have hardware virtualization support, and > we have VirtualBox for free. This all makes not necessary to go so deep > into kernel. coLinux is much nicer than full hardware emulators. Implementing the Linux kernel as a simple Windows user program is a great idea. I suppose that almost nothing is emulated (implemented, instead). I couldn't imagine something more efficient. I don't switch to a 64-bit OS because I would lose coLinux. -- Vincent Rivière |
From: yin s. <sun...@gm...> - 2013-03-04 23:37:47
|
I heard there is a claim that 64bit colinux is ready. but the developer needs some compensation for the hard work. On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Vincent Rivière <vin...@fr...> wrote: > On 04/03/2013 23:01, H. Nestler wrote: >> CoLinux was designed for long time for small hardware, and at a time >> where no other virtualization was available for free. For now we have >> better and faster computers, we have hardware virtualization support, and >> we have VirtualBox for free. This all makes not necessary to go so deep >> into kernel. > > coLinux is much nicer than full hardware emulators. > Implementing the Linux kernel as a simple Windows user program is a great > idea. I suppose that almost nothing is emulated (implemented, instead). I > couldn't imagine something more efficient. > > I don't switch to a 64-bit OS because I would lose coLinux. > > -- > Vincent Rivière > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb > _______________________________________________ > coLinux-users mailing list > coL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/colinux-users |