From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2010-11-08 15:35:10
|
Bugs item #3105348, was opened at 2010-11-08 16:35 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by informatimago You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101355&aid=3105348&group_id=1355 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: modules Group: lisp error Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Pascal J. Bourguignon (informatimago) Assigned to: Bruno Haible (haible) Summary: Internal error: statement in file "rawsock.c", line 1362 has Initial Comment: *** - Internal error: statement in file "rawsock.c", line 1362 has been reached!! while executing: (let ((socket (rawsock:socket :inet :dgram 0))) (setf (rawsock:socket-option socket LINUX:O_NONBLOCK) t)) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101355&aid=3105348&group_id=1355 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2010-11-08 15:45:05
|
Bugs item #3105348, was opened at 2010-11-08 16:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by informatimago You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101355&aid=3105348&group_id=1355 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: modules Group: lisp error Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Pascal J. Bourguignon (informatimago) Assigned to: Bruno Haible (haible) Summary: Internal error: statement in file "rawsock.c", line 1362 has Initial Comment: *** - Internal error: statement in file "rawsock.c", line 1362 has been reached!! while executing: (let ((socket (rawsock:socket :inet :dgram 0))) (setf (rawsock:socket-option socket LINUX:O_NONBLOCK) t)) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Pascal J. Bourguignon (informatimago) Date: 2010-11-08 16:45 Message: Notice that O_NONBLOCK seems to be a valid option for sockets, since it's mentionned in http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/recvfrom.html If no messages are available at the socket and O_NONBLOCK is not set on the socket's file descriptor, recvfrom() shall block until a message arrives. If no messages are available at the socket and O_NONBLOCK is set on the socket's file descriptor, recvfrom() shall fail and set errno to [EAGAIN] or [EWOULDBLOCK]. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101355&aid=3105348&group_id=1355 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2010-11-08 16:26:32
|
Bugs item #3105348, was opened at 2010-11-08 10:35 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by sds You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101355&aid=3105348&group_id=1355 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: modules Group: lisp error Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Pascal J. Bourguignon (informatimago) >Assigned to: Sam Steingold (sds) Summary: Internal error: statement in file "rawsock.c", line 1362 has Initial Comment: *** - Internal error: statement in file "rawsock.c", line 1362 has been reached!! while executing: (let ((socket (rawsock:socket :inet :dgram 0))) (setf (rawsock:socket-option socket LINUX:O_NONBLOCK) t)) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Sam Steingold (sds) Date: 2010-11-08 11:26 Message: why do you expect setsockopt to accept O_NONBLOCK? this is a fcntl option, so you want to use posix:stream-options http://clisp.sourceforge.net/impnotes/syscalls.html#fcntl alas, it it not setfable yet ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pascal J. Bourguignon (informatimago) Date: 2010-11-08 10:45 Message: Notice that O_NONBLOCK seems to be a valid option for sockets, since it's mentionned in http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/recvfrom.html If no messages are available at the socket and O_NONBLOCK is not set on the socket's file descriptor, recvfrom() shall block until a message arrives. If no messages are available at the socket and O_NONBLOCK is set on the socket's file descriptor, recvfrom() shall fail and set errno to [EAGAIN] or [EWOULDBLOCK]. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101355&aid=3105348&group_id=1355 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2010-11-08 17:01:42
|
Bugs item #3105348, was opened at 2010-11-08 10:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sds You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101355&aid=3105348&group_id=1355 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: modules Group: lisp error Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Pascal J. Bourguignon (informatimago) Assigned to: Sam Steingold (sds) Summary: Internal error: statement in file "rawsock.c", line 1362 has Initial Comment: *** - Internal error: statement in file "rawsock.c", line 1362 has been reached!! while executing: (let ((socket (rawsock:socket :inet :dgram 0))) (setf (rawsock:socket-option socket LINUX:O_NONBLOCK) t)) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Sam Steingold (sds) Date: 2010-11-08 12:01 Message: actually, it is setfable! (posix:stream-options socket :NONBLOCK t) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sam Steingold (sds) Date: 2010-11-08 11:26 Message: why do you expect setsockopt to accept O_NONBLOCK? this is a fcntl option, so you want to use posix:stream-options http://clisp.sourceforge.net/impnotes/syscalls.html#fcntl alas, it it not setfable yet ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pascal J. Bourguignon (informatimago) Date: 2010-11-08 10:45 Message: Notice that O_NONBLOCK seems to be a valid option for sockets, since it's mentionned in http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/recvfrom.html If no messages are available at the socket and O_NONBLOCK is not set on the socket's file descriptor, recvfrom() shall block until a message arrives. If no messages are available at the socket and O_NONBLOCK is set on the socket's file descriptor, recvfrom() shall fail and set errno to [EAGAIN] or [EWOULDBLOCK]. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101355&aid=3105348&group_id=1355 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2010-11-08 17:06:39
|
Bugs item #3105348, was opened at 2010-11-08 10:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sds You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101355&aid=3105348&group_id=1355 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: modules Group: lisp error >Status: Pending >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Pascal J. Bourguignon (informatimago) Assigned to: Sam Steingold (sds) Summary: Internal error: statement in file "rawsock.c", line 1362 has Initial Comment: *** - Internal error: statement in file "rawsock.c", line 1362 has been reached!! while executing: (let ((socket (rawsock:socket :inet :dgram 0))) (setf (rawsock:socket-option socket LINUX:O_NONBLOCK) t)) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sam Steingold (sds) Date: 2010-11-08 12:06 Message: This bug report is now marked as "pending"/"invalid". This means that we think that the problem you report is not a problem with CLISP. Unless you - the reporter - act within 2 weeks, the bug will be permanently closed. Sorry about the inconvenience - we hope your silence means that you agree that this is not a bug in CLISP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sam Steingold (sds) Date: 2010-11-08 12:01 Message: actually, it is setfable! (posix:stream-options socket :NONBLOCK t) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sam Steingold (sds) Date: 2010-11-08 11:26 Message: why do you expect setsockopt to accept O_NONBLOCK? this is a fcntl option, so you want to use posix:stream-options http://clisp.sourceforge.net/impnotes/syscalls.html#fcntl alas, it it not setfable yet ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pascal J. Bourguignon (informatimago) Date: 2010-11-08 10:45 Message: Notice that O_NONBLOCK seems to be a valid option for sockets, since it's mentionned in http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/recvfrom.html If no messages are available at the socket and O_NONBLOCK is not set on the socket's file descriptor, recvfrom() shall block until a message arrives. If no messages are available at the socket and O_NONBLOCK is set on the socket's file descriptor, recvfrom() shall fail and set errno to [EAGAIN] or [EWOULDBLOCK]. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101355&aid=3105348&group_id=1355 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2010-11-08 17:58:28
|
Bugs item #3105348, was opened at 2010-11-08 16:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by informatimago You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101355&aid=3105348&group_id=1355 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: modules Group: lisp error >Status: Closed Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Pascal J. Bourguignon (informatimago) Assigned to: Sam Steingold (sds) Summary: Internal error: statement in file "rawsock.c", line 1362 has Initial Comment: *** - Internal error: statement in file "rawsock.c", line 1362 has been reached!! while executing: (let ((socket (rawsock:socket :inet :dgram 0))) (setf (rawsock:socket-option socket LINUX:O_NONBLOCK) t)) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Pascal J. Bourguignon (informatimago) Date: 2010-11-08 18:58 Message: Ok. I didn't realize it was fcntl. Sorry for the noise. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sam Steingold (sds) Date: 2010-11-08 18:06 Message: This bug report is now marked as "pending"/"invalid". This means that we think that the problem you report is not a problem with CLISP. Unless you - the reporter - act within 2 weeks, the bug will be permanently closed. Sorry about the inconvenience - we hope your silence means that you agree that this is not a bug in CLISP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sam Steingold (sds) Date: 2010-11-08 18:01 Message: actually, it is setfable! (posix:stream-options socket :NONBLOCK t) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sam Steingold (sds) Date: 2010-11-08 17:26 Message: why do you expect setsockopt to accept O_NONBLOCK? this is a fcntl option, so you want to use posix:stream-options http://clisp.sourceforge.net/impnotes/syscalls.html#fcntl alas, it it not setfable yet ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pascal J. Bourguignon (informatimago) Date: 2010-11-08 16:45 Message: Notice that O_NONBLOCK seems to be a valid option for sockets, since it's mentionned in http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/recvfrom.html If no messages are available at the socket and O_NONBLOCK is not set on the socket's file descriptor, recvfrom() shall block until a message arrives. If no messages are available at the socket and O_NONBLOCK is set on the socket's file descriptor, recvfrom() shall fail and set errno to [EAGAIN] or [EWOULDBLOCK]. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101355&aid=3105348&group_id=1355 |