From: Stefan M. <mo...@ir...> - 2006-02-16 00:41:05
|
>> Note, tho, that the 1000-byte search would probably only only happen when >> the line has a ">>" on it. And it's all very much fast enough for >> self-insert-command. The problem is much more severe when you're running >> a command that does many buffer modification and thus runs the hook >> many times without intervening user interaction. > There's the macro combine-after-change-calls to mitigate this. Yes, for code that knows about it. A grep shows that it is *very* rarely used. Stefan |