activelock-development Mailing List for ActiveLock
Brought to you by:
ialkan
Menu
▾
▴
activelock-development — ActiveLock Software Development Mailing List
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(52) |
Aug
(170) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(62) |
Nov
(46) |
Dec
(3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
(17) |
May
(14) |
Jun
(31) |
Jul
(59) |
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(5) |
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(4) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Michael C. <mc...@gm...> - 2005-04-19 02:39:32
|
Hello All ActiveLock Users, This is the last email you will see from me as the project administrator.= =20 Over the past several days I have been working with three new project=20 administrators and now they are eager to get things under way. After seeing= =20 some of the plans these new developers have for ActiveLock I have renewed= =20 faith that the project will move on and that it will be better than ever. I= =20 encourage all users who want to develop on the project to send an email to= =20 the new project administrators; you will find them hanging around on=20 act...@li....=20 The new project admins are: Terrence Kuchel, Ishmael, and Scott Nelson. I= =20 hope you will show them the same level of support that you showed Thanh and= =20 myself when we started working on version 2.0 And now some last shameless plugs. The new admins have set up a beautiful= =20 forum located at http://activelock.sourceforge.net/phpBB2/index.php also=20 know that project development continues at SourceForge.net<http://SourceForge.net>and there are lists at SourceForge on which you will find support and development news for ActiveLock. Yahoo groups has been deprecated and I=20 encourage everyone to use act...@li... for= =20 development and act...@li... for general=20 ActiveLock chatter.=20 I wish you all the best of luck under your new leadership and hope to see= =20 ActiveLock grow to becoming a common method of protecting software used by= =20 developers worldwide. Happy Development, -Mike --=20 ________________________________ Michael E. Crute Software Developer SoftGroup Development Corporation=20 "In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?" |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-04-16 22:00:05
|
Support Requests item #1180099, was opened at 2005-04-10 19:01 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by tkuchel You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1180099&group_id=70007 Category: Implementation Issue Group: Documentation Team >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: tkuchel (tkuchel) >Assigned to: tkuchel (tkuchel) Summary: function Getword & putword Initial Comment: hi guys first off great job with activelock. secondly i was trying to experiment with some source code specifically the blowfish class but when debugging it errors on all the GetWord calls and i can't seem to locate the function anywhere i am using microsoft access for my programing . so bacically just wondering which class or module the GetWord & Putword functions is in or where i could find a copy i have googled but none of the ones i found seems to have the right parameters. I kind of figured that i must of left out a bit of code somewhere cause i'm missing the getword and putword Functions. Thanks for you help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1180099&group_id=70007 |
|
From: Michael C. <mc...@gm...> - 2005-04-12 18:04:16
|
Is there no one out there that would like to take over the role of the=20 ActiveLock project administrator? Come on people speak now or forever hold= =20 your peace. Effective May 1 if no project admin steps up its OVER the=20 project will be declared abandoned on SourceForge and everything you have= =20 now is all that you are going to have, there will be no more releases no=20 more updates no more official support, its all done. So somebody step up.= =20 Email me if you are at all interested. Keep ActiveLock alive! -Mike --=20 ________________________________ Michael E. Crute "In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?" |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-04-10 09:01:23
|
Support Requests item #1180099, was opened at 2005-04-10 19:01 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1180099&group_id=70007 Category: Implementation Issue Group: Documentation Team Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: tkuchel (tkuchel) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: function Getword & putword Initial Comment: hi guys first off great job with activelock. secondly i was trying to experiment with some source code specifically the blowfish class but when debugging it errors on all the GetWord calls and i can't seem to locate the function anywhere i am using microsoft access for my programing . so bacically just wondering which class or module the GetWord & Putword functions is in or where i could find a copy i have googled but none of the ones i found seems to have the right parameters. I kind of figured that i must of left out a bit of code somewhere cause i'm missing the getword and putword Functions. Thanks for you help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1180099&group_id=70007 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-04 08:48:09
|
Support Requests item #1156506, was opened at 2005-03-04 08:48 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1156506&group_id=70007 Category: Implementation Issue Group: Support Team Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: stevew (ste_m_williams) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: activelock multiple users single machine Initial Comment: Dear Team I use an ancient version of activelock (the activex is nslock15vb6.ocx) but it has always served me well. However I now have a problem. A user installs and unlocks my software on their PC with no problem. A second user with an account on the same PC (but different privilages) tries to run the program and gets the following (see image) Run-time error '26001': Failed to set registry value Key:'- 21474836446',Section:'SOFTWARE\Nelco\...(some hex codes in here)...',Key:'6C335A0B432642' to value:" If it is relevant the first user was an administrator. Clearly I need to clean the registry but I don't want users to have to do this. Can you provide any background information on why and what is actually going on? I don't want to stop using activelock but clearly this is a big problem for me Regards Steve ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1156506&group_id=70007 |
|
From: sdmad m <sd...@ho...> - 2005-03-03 15:53:13
|
Hi Ambski. As I understand, you use AL v1.5 and you receive software codes from your users in lower case format, correct? All codes AL1.5 generates, both softwarecodes and unlock codes are in hex format (the numbers 0 -9 and upper case letters A-F). My first guess is that your users maybe write down the codes in lower case, regardless of what they read on the register form. Check this out... Regards Mads >Support Requests item #1152167, was opened at 2005-02-26 01:18 >Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item >Submitter >You can respond by visiting: >https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1152167&group_id=70007 > >Category: None >Group: Documentation Team >Status: Open >Resolution: None >Priority: 5 >Submitted By: Ambski (ambski) >Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: lowercase Software Code registration problems > >Initial Comment: >Hi SF, >I have a software which is protected by activelock 1.5 >quite successfully however recently i have received 2 >software codes from users which have the letters in >lowercase. I generate the Unlock code as normal but it >does not work. > >I have tried all alternatives, ie: changing the software >code letters to uppercase and generating code / >generating the code and replacing with lowercase letters >etc but to no avail. > >All uppercase software codes are registering without >problems. > >I am desperate for support on this issue. Please help. >To see a working example the trial version can be >downloaded here: >http://www.ultimateboxingmanager.com/UBMSetup.exe > >Thank you for your help! >Anthony. > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >You can respond by visiting: >https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1152167&group_id=70007 > > >------------------------------------------------------- >SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. >Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. >http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click >_______________________________________________ >Activelock-Development mailing list >Act...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/activelock-development _________________________________________________________________ MSN Messenger http://www.msn.no/messenger Den korteste veien mellom deg og dine venner |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-03-01 21:32:44
|
Support Requests item #1154582, was opened at 2005-03-01 21:32 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1154582&group_id=70007 Category: Implementation Issue Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ambski (ambski) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Urgent help needed! Lowercase Software Code problems Initial Comment: Hi support, Just wondering how my initial support request regarding the problems i am having using activelock are progressing? I am still receiving lowercase letter Software Codes and the situation is becoming more difficult. Please help me. Anthony. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1154582&group_id=70007 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-26 05:05:29
|
Feature Requests item #776088, was opened at 2003-07-23 02:14 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mcrute You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526388&aid=776088&group_id=70007 Category: General Group: Next Major Version >Status: Pending Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Assigned to: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Summary: Support Concurrent/Site Licenses Initial Comment: Ability to restrict to no more than X number of users to use the product at the same time within the same organization. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Michael E. Crute (mcrute) Date: 2005-02-26 00:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=564093 Very old ticket. Moved to pending. Will implement in 2.1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2004-02-04 01:33 Message: Logged In: NO cool !!! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Date: 2003-10-30 21:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=797792 This feature will be on the dev plan for 2.1. - Thanh ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2003-10-29 15:38 Message: Logged In: NO This is feature more important of the new version of the ActiveLock! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2003-09-03 08:37 Message: Logged In: NO Very important! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526388&aid=776088&group_id=70007 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-26 05:04:34
|
Feature Requests item #823893, was opened at 2003-10-14 23:39 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mcrute You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526388&aid=823893&group_id=70007 Category: General Group: Next Release (Any) >Status: Pending Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Assigned to: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Summary: Can you allow for reduction of the key length Initial Comment: Logged on behalf of Hypercubed.... Currently, the generated key is very long (probably because of using 1024-bit encryption). Would like to be able to generate keys with shorter length. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Michael E. Crute (mcrute) Date: 2005-02-26 00:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=564093 This is very old. Is there a response to this? Will expire the ticket May-7-05 if no response. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael E. Crute (mcrute) Date: 2004-01-27 20:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=564093 Your request has been assigned to a developer and will be completed whenever that developer gets a chance to work on it (based on the criticality of the issue). -Mike (Project Manager) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526388&aid=823893&group_id=70007 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-26 05:03:19
|
Feature Requests item #885892, was opened at 2004-01-27 19:14 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mcrute You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526388&aid=885892&group_id=70007 Category: activelock2.dll Group: Whenever We Can >Status: Pending Resolution: Accepted Priority: 1 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Summary: Date Format Initial Comment: Sorry, discard previous. Put date format as mm/dd/yyyy in file .lic Thank's Luiz C. Pinheiro ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Michael E. Crute (mcrute) Date: 2005-02-26 00:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=564093 Accepted. Moved to pending. Will need closed when implemented. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael E. Crute (mcrute) Date: 2004-01-27 20:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=564093 We will eventually add support for European style dates but this is not a critical issue so it will be dealt with whenever our developers get a chance to make a European port of ActiveLock. Thanks. -Mike (Project Manager) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526388&aid=885892&group_id=70007 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-26 05:02:39
|
Feature Requests item #892313, was opened at 2004-02-07 02:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mcrute You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526388&aid=892313&group_id=70007 Category: activelock2.dll Group: Future Development >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Summary: CD lock Initial Comment: add CD lock for some damaged sectors of CD. (CDrom- key) "optional featured" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Michael E. Crute (mcrute) Date: 2005-02-26 00:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=564093 Past 6 month cutoff for response. Moved to pending. Do we have the status of this request? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526388&aid=892313&group_id=70007 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-26 05:01:42
|
Feature Requests item #1017830, was opened at 2004-08-27 14:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mcrute You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526388&aid=1017830&group_id=70007 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Assigned to: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Summary: GetProductLicense Initial Comment: Suppose you want to display the licence type to the user. There is not a way to get the ProductLic. I noticed the degates for RegisteredUser, InstalledDate etc But what about just returning the Product Lic in a routine like simular to Aquire (SEE BELOW) Or is this a security hole? ThanX GDM ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Private Function IActiveLock_GetProductLicense() As ProductLicense 'Modified by GDM 8/27/2004 If mKeyStore Is Nothing Then Err.Raise ActiveLockErrCodeConstants.alerrKeyStoreInvalid, "IActiv eLock_Acquire", "Key Store Provider hasn't been initialized yet." End If Dim Lic As ProductLicense Set Lic = mKeyStore.Retrieve(mSoftwareName) If Lic Is Nothing Then Err.Raise ActiveLockErrCodeConstants.alerrNoLicense, "IActiveLock _Acquire", "No valid license" End If ' Validate license ValidateLic Lic IActiveLock_GetProductLicense = Lic End Function ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Michael E. Crute (mcrute) Date: 2005-02-26 00:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=564093 Issue resolved. Closing ticket. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Date: 2004-08-31 23:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=797792 Hi GDM, This is an API enhancement, not a bug. Kudos for contributing a sample implementation (I wish more people were like you). +1 Will add it to the next (beta?) release. /Thanh ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526388&aid=1017830&group_id=70007 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-26 04:59:06
|
Bugs item #786272, was opened at 2003-08-10 09:49 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mcrute You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526385&aid=786272&group_id=70007 Category: ActiveLock 2 Crypto Library Group: Development Team >Status: Pending >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) >Assigned to: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Summary: LastUsed property may not be working properly Initial Comment: Issue reported by Antonio Banton(?). ------ If you generate a "periodic" licence liberation key and you play around with the system date, the sample application works with no problem. Here is the test case: 1. Open ActiveLock2 Test App and go to Registration tab 2. Generate a request code and copy it into the Admin tab 3. Select Licence Type: periodic 30 days 4. Apply the key to the registration tab (click on register) 5. Exit the application 6. Move the date forward 31 days 7. Open the application and you get "License expired" message 8. Close the application and set the system date back 9. The application continue working without any problems ----- I think the problem may be LastUsed is not updated if "License expired" condition is met. Needs further investigation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Michael E. Crute (mcrute) Date: 2005-02-25 23:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=564093 Shifted to pending since no resolution in 6 months. Can we close this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Date: 2003-11-30 00:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=797792 Also see <a href="http://www.activelock.org/boards/index.php? showtopic=73">discussion topic 73</a> for more info. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526385&aid=786272&group_id=70007 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-26 04:57:40
|
Bugs item #948958, was opened at 2004-05-06 00:32 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mcrute You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526385&aid=948958&group_id=70007 Category: ActiveLock 2 Object Library Group: Development Team >Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Assigned to: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Summary: LastUsed property may cause complication during DST Initial Comment: Release 2.0.6 When Daylight Saving Time (DST) comes into effect and the clock is automatically set back 1 hour. Consequently, the license may become valid because LastUsed property validation will fail. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Michael E. Crute (mcrute) Date: 2005-02-25 23:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=564093 Issue resolved. Closing ticket. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Date: 2004-07-19 07:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=797792 Fixed in 2.0.10 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Date: 2004-05-06 17:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=797792 > the license may become valid ^^^ That should have said "invalid". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526385&aid=948958&group_id=70007 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-26 04:56:18
|
Support Requests item #1085430, was opened at 2004-12-14 17:16 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mcrute You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1085430&group_id=70007 Category: None Group: Support Team >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: vwalla (vwalla) >Assigned to: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Summary: Form Opening? Initial Comment: At step 4 in the ActiveLock 2 tutorial, a message box will appear stating that there is no valid license. This does happen, but my main form opens up immediatley after that. Is this correct or am I doing something wrong. I have not gotten past that point b/c it seems that it would not let the form open. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Michael E. Crute (mcrute) Date: 2005-02-25 23:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=564093 I am closing this per resolution by Thanh Dec-17-04 -Mike ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Date: 2004-12-17 04:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=797792 <<This does happen, but my main form opens up immediatley after that. Is this correct>> Yes, but only because that's the way it's programmed in the tutorial. Instead of (and in addition to) that message box, you could just as easily program the application to terminate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1085430&group_id=70007 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-26 04:53:23
|
Support Requests item #1152167, was opened at 2005-02-25 20:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mcrute You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1152167&group_id=70007 >Category: Implementation Issue >Group: Support Team Status: Open >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ambski (ambski) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: lowercase Software Code registration problems Initial Comment: Hi SF, I have a software which is protected by activelock 1.5 quite successfully however recently i have received 2 software codes from users which have the letters in lowercase. I generate the Unlock code as normal but it does not work. I have tried all alternatives, ie: changing the software code letters to uppercase and generating code / generating the code and replacing with lowercase letters etc but to no avail. All uppercase software codes are registering without problems. I am desperate for support on this issue. Please help. To see a working example the trial version can be downloaded here: http://www.ultimateboxingmanager.com/UBMSetup.exe Thank you for your help! Anthony. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Michael E. Crute (mcrute) Date: 2005-02-25 23:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=564093 I am marking this as Accepted/In Progress and will forward it out to the lists for resolution. -Mike ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1152167&group_id=70007 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-26 01:18:05
|
Support Requests item #1152167, was opened at 2005-02-26 01:18 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1152167&group_id=70007 Category: None Group: Documentation Team Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ambski (ambski) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: lowercase Software Code registration problems Initial Comment: Hi SF, I have a software which is protected by activelock 1.5 quite successfully however recently i have received 2 software codes from users which have the letters in lowercase. I generate the Unlock code as normal but it does not work. I have tried all alternatives, ie: changing the software code letters to uppercase and generating code / generating the code and replacing with lowercase letters etc but to no avail. All uppercase software codes are registering without problems. I am desperate for support on this issue. Please help. To see a working example the trial version can be downloaded here: http://www.ultimateboxingmanager.com/UBMSetup.exe Thank you for your help! Anthony. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1152167&group_id=70007 |
|
From: Thanh H. T. <th...@sy...> - 2004-12-19 10:08:03
|
> > >Isnt this just because the VCODE is the same? > Yep, sure is. Dan Keeley wrote on 17/12/2004 6:46 AM: >Isnt this just because the VCODE is the same? > >He probably didnt regenerate the vcode for the new application name? > >Or does the application name not get used here? > > > >>Support Requests item #1013061, was opened at 2004-08-20 18:41 >>Message generated for change (Comment added) made by th2tran >>You can respond by visiting: >>https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1013061&group_id=70007 >> >>Category: None >>Group: Support Team >> >> >>>Status: Closed >>> >>> >>Resolution: Accepted >>Priority: 5 >>Submitted By: Andy Kirk (andykirk) >>Assigned to: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) >>Summary: Module Support >> >>Initial Comment: >>I have used ActiveLock 1.8 in many projects for a while >>now, but have only just found about this new version 2. >> >>I have an application now, which is split into three >>modules. Each of these modules (in the same binary) >>need to be licenced seperately, so that the user can >>choose which of the modules they want to run. >> >>i.e, >>Licence 1: Module 1, Module 2 & Module 3 >>Licence 2: Module 1 only >>Licence 3: Module 2 only >>Licence 4: Module 2 and 3 >> >>I though that one way to do this would be to support >>three seperate active lock components, each with a >>different application name, and then build a screen to >>allow the user to liberate the modules they need. >> >>The problem with this is that when I attempted to >>generate the application codes for the three >>applications (ProTrack-SM, ProTrack-CM, ProTrack-AD) >>all of the codes generated for each application appeared >>to be the same. >> >>Please advise if the desired solution is possible using the >>ActiveLock product. >> >>Thanks >> >> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >>>Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) >>> >>> >>Date: 2004-12-17 09:55 >> >>Message: >>Logged In: YES >>user_id=797792 >> >>Closed since there's no further followup questions by >>originator. >> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) >>Date: 2004-08-20 19:04 >> >>Message: >>Logged In: YES >>user_id=797792 >> >>Hi Andy, >>You're on the right track. But what you need to do is: you >>need to generate a different Software Code for each of your >>modules. You can't use the same code for all 3 modules, >>otherwise the generated license will be identical. >> >>We will likely implement modular/feature based licensing in >>2.1. But for, your suggested approach is the way to go. >> >>/Thanh >> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> |
|
From: Dan K. <da...@da...> - 2004-12-17 11:46:25
|
Isnt this just because the VCODE is the same? He probably didnt regenerate the vcode for the new application name? Or does the application name not get used here? > Support Requests item #1013061, was opened at 2004-08-20 18:41 > Message generated for change (Comment added) made by th2tran > You can respond by visiting: > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1013061&group_id=70007 > > Category: None > Group: Support Team >>Status: Closed > Resolution: Accepted > Priority: 5 > Submitted By: Andy Kirk (andykirk) > Assigned to: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) > Summary: Module Support > > Initial Comment: > I have used ActiveLock 1.8 in many projects for a while > now, but have only just found about this new version 2. > > I have an application now, which is split into three > modules. Each of these modules (in the same binary) > need to be licenced seperately, so that the user can > choose which of the modules they want to run. > > i.e, > Licence 1: Module 1, Module 2 & Module 3 > Licence 2: Module 1 only > Licence 3: Module 2 only > Licence 4: Module 2 and 3 > > I though that one way to do this would be to support > three seperate active lock components, each with a > different application name, and then build a screen to > allow the user to liberate the modules they need. > > The problem with this is that when I attempted to > generate the application codes for the three > applications (ProTrack-SM, ProTrack-CM, ProTrack-AD) > all of the codes generated for each application appeared > to be the same. > > Please advise if the desired solution is possible using the > ActiveLock product. > > Thanks > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) > Date: 2004-12-17 09:55 > > Message: > Logged In: YES > user_id=797792 > > Closed since there's no further followup questions by > originator. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) > Date: 2004-08-20 19:04 > > Message: > Logged In: YES > user_id=797792 > > Hi Andy, > You're on the right track. But what you need to do is: you > need to generate a different Software Code for each of your > modules. You can't use the same code for all 3 modules, > otherwise the generated license will be identical. > > We will likely implement modular/feature based licensing in > 2.1. But for, your suggested approach is the way to go. > > /Thanh > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > You can respond by visiting: > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1013061&group_id=70007 > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Activelock-Development mailing list > Act...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/activelock-development > |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-12-17 09:55:15
|
Support Requests item #1013061, was opened at 2004-08-20 18:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by th2tran You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1013061&group_id=70007 Category: None Group: Support Team >Status: Closed Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andy Kirk (andykirk) Assigned to: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Summary: Module Support Initial Comment: I have used ActiveLock 1.8 in many projects for a while now, but have only just found about this new version 2. I have an application now, which is split into three modules. Each of these modules (in the same binary) need to be licenced seperately, so that the user can choose which of the modules they want to run. i.e, Licence 1: Module 1, Module 2 & Module 3 Licence 2: Module 1 only Licence 3: Module 2 only Licence 4: Module 2 and 3 I though that one way to do this would be to support three seperate active lock components, each with a different application name, and then build a screen to allow the user to liberate the modules they need. The problem with this is that when I attempted to generate the application codes for the three applications (ProTrack-SM, ProTrack-CM, ProTrack-AD) all of the codes generated for each application appeared to be the same. Please advise if the desired solution is possible using the ActiveLock product. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Date: 2004-12-17 09:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=797792 Closed since there's no further followup questions by originator. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Date: 2004-08-20 19:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=797792 Hi Andy, You're on the right track. But what you need to do is: you need to generate a different Software Code for each of your modules. You can't use the same code for all 3 modules, otherwise the generated license will be identical. We will likely implement modular/feature based licensing in 2.1. But for, your suggested approach is the way to go. /Thanh ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1013061&group_id=70007 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-12-17 09:53:27
|
Support Requests item #1085430, was opened at 2004-12-14 22:16 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by th2tran You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1085430&group_id=70007 Category: None Group: Support Team Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: vwalla (vwalla) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Form Opening? Initial Comment: At step 4 in the ActiveLock 2 tutorial, a message box will appear stating that there is no valid license. This does happen, but my main form opens up immediatley after that. Is this correct or am I doing something wrong. I have not gotten past that point b/c it seems that it would not let the form open. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Date: 2004-12-17 09:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=797792 <<This does happen, but my main form opens up immediatley after that. Is this correct>> Yes, but only because that's the way it's programmed in the tutorial. Instead of (and in addition to) that message box, you could just as easily program the application to terminate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1085430&group_id=70007 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-12-14 22:16:22
|
Support Requests item #1085430, was opened at 2004-12-14 16:16 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1085430&group_id=70007 Category: None Group: Support Team Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: vwalla (vwalla) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Form Opening? Initial Comment: At step 4 in the ActiveLock 2 tutorial, a message box will appear stating that there is no valid license. This does happen, but my main form opens up immediatley after that. Is this correct or am I doing something wrong. I have not gotten past that point b/c it seems that it would not let the form open. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1085430&group_id=70007 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-09-08 23:24:52
|
Task #104112 has been updated. Project: ActiveLock Subproject: ActiveLock Website Summary: Erratic behaviour with FAQ software Complete: 5% Status: Open Authority : th2tran Assigned to: mcrute Description: I'm seeing the occasional flakiness with the FAQ part of the website. Getting this error: "Fatal error: Failed opening required 'config.inc.php' (include_path='') in /home/groups/a/ac/activelock/htdocs/faq/index.php on line 18 Is this a concurrency issue? Anyhow, this should be looked at and fixed before it annoys the heck out of our users. Follow-Ups: ------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2004-09-08 18:24 By: mcrute Comment: This is a know issue that will not be resolved until the next rewrite of the ActiveLock.org website. More information on the rewrite will be forthcoming at a later date. ------------------------------------------------------- For more info, visit: http://sourceforge.net/pm/task.php?func=detailtask&project_task_id=104112&group_id=70007&group_project_id=30873 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-09-01 04:52:33
|
Task #104112 has been updated. Project: ActiveLock Subproject: ActiveLock Website Summary: Erratic behaviour with FAQ software Complete: 0% Status: Open Authority : th2tran Assigned to: mcrute Description: I'm seeing the occasional flakiness with the FAQ part of the website. Getting this error: "Fatal error: Failed opening required 'config.inc.php' (include_path='') in /home/groups/a/ac/activelock/htdocs/faq/index.php on line 18 Is this a concurrency issue? Anyhow, this should be looked at and fixed before it annoys the heck out of our users. ------------------------------------------------------- For more info, visit: http://sourceforge.net/pm/task.php?func=detailtask&project_task_id=104112&group_id=70007&group_project_id=30873 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-09-01 04:18:22
|
Feature Requests item #1017830, was opened at 2004-08-27 19:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by th2tran You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526388&aid=1017830&group_id=70007 >Category: None >Group: None Status: Open >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: GetProductLicense Initial Comment: Suppose you want to display the licence type to the user. There is not a way to get the ProductLic. I noticed the degates for RegisteredUser, InstalledDate etc But what about just returning the Product Lic in a routine like simular to Aquire (SEE BELOW) Or is this a security hole? ThanX GDM ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Private Function IActiveLock_GetProductLicense() As ProductLicense 'Modified by GDM 8/27/2004 If mKeyStore Is Nothing Then Err.Raise ActiveLockErrCodeConstants.alerrKeyStoreInvalid, "IActiv eLock_Acquire", "Key Store Provider hasn't been initialized yet." End If Dim Lic As ProductLicense Set Lic = mKeyStore.Retrieve(mSoftwareName) If Lic Is Nothing Then Err.Raise ActiveLockErrCodeConstants.alerrNoLicense, "IActiveLock _Acquire", "No valid license" End If ' Validate license ValidateLic Lic IActiveLock_GetProductLicense = Lic End Function ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Date: 2004-09-01 04:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=797792 Hi GDM, This is an API enhancement, not a bug. Kudos for contributing a sample implementation (I wish more people were like you). +1 Will add it to the next (beta?) release. /Thanh ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526388&aid=1017830&group_id=70007 |
3 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.