From: Pavel M. <pa...@uc...> - 2002-04-28 21:19:33
Attachments:
combined.2.diff#gz
|
Hi! Seems that suspend-to-ram needs stopping all processes, too. I had to combine S3 patches with swsusp to make it possible. That means that you get suspend-to-disk for free with the bundle ;-). Pavel -- (about SSSCA) "I don't say this lightly. However, I really think that the U.S. no longer is classifiable as a democracy, but rather as a plutocracy." --hpa |
From: Beau V.C. B. <be...@bo...> - 2002-04-29 11:46:55
Attachments:
public_key.asc
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 :-( doesn't patch very well with 2.4.18-acpi-20020404... is this one jus= t for=20 2.5? - - Beau V.C. Bellamy >Hi! >Seems that suspend-to-ram needs stopping all processes, too. I had to >combine S3 patches with swsusp to make it possible. That means that >you get suspend-to-disk for free with the bundle ;-). =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09Pavel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8zTLBZfNHjVniGucRAolsAKCBE4nthfvbXrenuBLyWi/gRwvTgACeJmGL kFiZZKA/rNafZZVdXbiVDEg=3D =3DrZqN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Diane T. <di...@gh...> - 2002-05-01 18:15:49
|
Pavel Machek <pa...@uc...> writes: > Hi! > > Seems that suspend-to-ram needs stopping all processes, too. I had to > combine S3 patches with swsusp to make it possible. That means that > you get suspend-to-disk for free with the bundle ;-). Out of curiosity what were you patching against? I've tried linux-2.5.7 through 2.5.11 but keep getting various errors. Also the patch tries to apply to my .config file which might not be whats intended. diane |
From: Pavel M. <pa...@uc...> - 2002-05-03 08:19:14
|
Hi! > > Hi! > > > > Seems that suspend-to-ram needs stopping all processes, too. I had to > > combine S3 patches with swsusp to make it possible. That means that > > you get suspend-to-disk for free with the bundle ;-). > > Out of curiosity what were you patching against? I've tried > linux-2.5.7 through 2.5.11 but keep getting various errors. It was against 2.5.10+acpi0419. > Also the patch tries to apply to my .config file which might not be > whats intended. Well, I should hand-edit patches a bit ;-). Pavel -- (about SSSCA) "I don't say this lightly. However, I really think that the U.S. no longer is classifiable as a democracy, but rather as a plutocracy." --hpa |
From: Knut N. <knu...@un...> - 2002-05-09 22:25:00
|
Hi, I tested the combined one against 2.5.10 and neither part does work on my vaio z600tek. echo 3 > /proc/acpi/sleep puts the notebook into S3 from which it cant return. Using the powerbutton to turn it on again results in power and suspend led turning on but nothing else (no harddisk, no lcd, no fan, nothing). I have to remove whatever powersupply to get into a useable state. echo 4 > /proc/acpi/sleep seems to put the notebook into S4 since it writes several messages to the console. But it never really powers it off and instead reboots the machine...it then boots the kernel until the ide-driver-part and hangs. Unfortunately this does not seem to be very promising getting S3/S4 to work on my machine...since those are beautiful to have working on a notebook let me know if I can do anything to help out. Regards -Knut Am Son, 2002-04-28 um 23.17 schrieb Pavel Machek: > Hi! > > Seems that suspend-to-ram needs stopping all processes, too. I had to > combine S3 patches with swsusp to make it possible. That means that > you get suspend-to-disk for free with the bundle ;-). > Pavel > -- > (about SSSCA) "I don't say this lightly. However, I really think that the U.S. > no longer is classifiable as a democracy, but rather as a plutocracy." --hpa -- |
From: Pavel M. <pa...@uc...> - 2002-05-09 22:58:41
|
Hi! > I tested the combined one against 2.5.10 and neither part does work on > my vaio z600tek. > > echo 3 > /proc/acpi/sleep puts the notebook into S3 from which it cant > return. Using the powerbutton to turn it on again results in power and > suspend led turning on but nothing else (no harddisk, no lcd, no fan, > nothing). I have to remove whatever powersupply to get into a useable > state. S4 is more mature, lets start with that, okay? > echo 4 > /proc/acpi/sleep seems to put the notebook into S4 since it > writes several messages to the console. But it never really powers it > off and instead reboots the machine...it then boots the kernel until the > ide-driver-part and hangs. Do you have resume=/foo/bar on the commandline of the kernel? (see Doc*/swsusp.txt). > Unfortunately this does not seem to be very promising getting S3/S4 to > work on my machine...since those are beautiful to have working on a > notebook let me know if I can do anything to help out. Pavel -- Casualities in World Trade Center: ~3k dead inside the building, cryptography in U.S.A. and free speech in Czech Republic. |
From: Christian S. <chr...@gm...> - 2002-05-10 12:53:21
|
Knut Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > I tested the combined one against 2.5.10 and neither part does work on > my vaio z600tek. > > echo 3 > /proc/acpi/sleep puts the notebook into S3 from which it cant > return. Using the powerbutton to turn it on again results in power and > suspend led turning on but nothing else (no harddisk, no lcd, no fan, > nothing). I have to remove whatever powersupply to get into a useable > state. > > echo 4 > /proc/acpi/sleep seems to put the notebook into S4 since it > writes several messages to the console. But it never really powers it > off and instead reboots the machine...it then boots the kernel until the > ide-driver-part and hangs. > Hi, just tested same here with 2.4.18 and acpi-0503 and pciirq.16. on my A7V (BIOS 1008) echo 3 > /proc/acpi/sleep puts the machine into sleep (the corresponding LED is blinking). Pushing the power button, the machine boots up again with no problem. Don't know if that is what it's supposed to be... echo 4 > /proc/acpi/sleep -> no reaction at all Chris -- Linux - Cause life is too short for reboots |