mpls-linux-general Mailing List for MPLS for Linux

Looks like this is the second time that Mr Eric W. Biederman
has stolen my code and called it his own, just cause he got it
included into the kernel.

It definitly looks like this is funtional LSR fuctionality.

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 03:34:51PM +0100, Emmanuel Chaput wrote:
>     Hi all,
> 
>     please accept my apologies if this is a stupid question, but what is
> the current status of mpls-linux ?
> 
>     Last updates on both the original branch and the fork are several
> years old.
> 
>     Since linux 4.1, there seems to be some support for "mpls routing"
> within the kernel, but I can not find any information on how to use it.
> Does this mean that Linux could act as a LSR ?
> 
>     If any one has some info to share on this, I would really appreciate.
> 
>     Regards
> 
> -- 
> Emmanuel Chaput, Maître de Conférences - Dépt Télécom & Réseau, ENSEEIHT
> Equipe Ingénierie Réseaux et Télécommunications                IRIT-CNRS
> Responsable formation ingénieur Informatique & Réseaux par Apprentissage
> *5 34 32 22 31 - Fax *5 34 32 21 57                Emm...@n7...
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Presto, an open source distributed SQL query engine for big data, initially
> developed by Facebook, enables you to easily query your data on Hadoop in a 
> more interactive manner. Teradata is also now providing full enterprise
> support for Presto. Download a free open source copy now.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=250295911&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general


-- 
James R. Leu
jl...@mi...

    Hi all,

    please accept my apologies if this is a stupid question, but what is
the current status of mpls-linux ?

    Last updates on both the original branch and the fork are several
years old.

    Since linux 4.1, there seems to be some support for "mpls routing"
within the kernel, but I can not find any information on how to use it.
Does this mean that Linux could act as a LSR ?

    If any one has some info to share on this, I would really appreciate.

    Regards

-- 
Emmanuel Chaput, Maître de Conférences - Dépt Télécom & Réseau, ENSEEIHT
Equipe Ingénierie Réseaux et Télécommunications                IRIT-CNRS
Responsable formation ingénieur Informatique & Réseaux par Apprentissage
*5 34 32 22 31 - Fax *5 34 32 21 57                Emm...@n7...

Hi List

I am testing mpls-linux in a voyage linux system and I am suffering a weir
behaviour.

I am following several tutorial for set up the mpls tunnels and I am
stucked when I need to map the IP traffic to an specific MPLS tunnel. I one
node, I am doing this:

mpls nhlfe add key 0 instructions push gen 1000 nexthop eth1 ipv4
10.10.10.22

and then

ip route add 10.10.0.2/24 via 10.10.10.22 mpls 0x2

but the ip route command gives me an error:

Error: argument "mpls" is wrong: Can't define mpls when using IP forwarding

But I am sure that IP forwarding is disabled:

# sysctl net.ipv4.ip_forwardnet.ipv4.ip_forward = 0

So, how can I fix it? This is a normal behaviour and there is another way
to stablish the tunnel? Or maybe the iproute package I am using is not the
right one?

My mpls compiled version is: Linux voyage 2.6.32
And iproute2 package is get from:

https://github.com/i-maravic/iproute2

Any idea or suggestion?

Thank you

Kind regards,
Esteban



-- 
Esteban

Hi All,


Anyone Please tell me about about how to compile the linux kernel 3.0.51
 with Mpls enabled.
If patch is available then Please share with me.

Thanks for your help in advance.



Regards
Aman

Hi All,

    After building & booting with 2.6.35 kernel with latest mpls patch, I created NHLFE entry and tried to add that entry in "ip route add" command. But the kernel panics at inet_rtm_newroute() function. Without "mpls ox2" suffix, it is properly working. And the panic message is "stack corruption".

    Are you aware of any issue while adding FTN entry in FIB table in the latest MPLS kernel patch ??

Thanks,
Rajaram.
 		 	   		   		 	   		  

Dear all, Hi, 

Has anyone managed to setup DiffServ and MPLS using the 3.2 Linux Kernel ? If yes which version of iproute2 and iptables package did you use ? 

Following the instructions distributed with mpls-linux-labs with the appropriate modifications in the MPLS commands, I have managed to have DSCP marked traffic encapsulated with the appropriate MPLS EXP field (for E-LSP) but I am failing in making it pass through right HTB leaf for my DiffServ Implementation. 

Any help would be appreciated. 

Best Regards 
George 

--



George K. Xilouris
Associate Researcher		
NCSR Demokritos 
Institute of Informatics and Telecommunications 
P.O. Box 60228 
15310, Agia Paraskevi, Greece 

phone: + (30) 210 650 31 08 
fax: + (30) 210 653 21 75 

Web: http://medianetlab.gr/~xilouris
LinkedIn//Twitter


The information transmitted by this e-mail is exclusively directed to the addressee (person or entity) and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, disclosure, copying, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance upon the contained information, by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this in error, please notify the sender and delete the material from any electronic device.

Hey George,

Thanks very much for your thorough response, I really appreciate it.

Best regards,
Daniel


Le 18/09/2012 11:58, George Xilouris a écrit :
> Dear Daniel,
>
> Regarding the issue you raise, I would not suggest at this point the
> use of the current Linux MPLS implementation in a production network.
> It is still in experimental stage and there is a clear luck of
> adequate documentation. Effectively, the only helpful documentation
> (to my knowledge) with UseCases and step through them exists for the
> older mpls-linux version [1]
> <http://ontwerpen1.khlim.be/%7Elrutten/cursussen/comm2/mpls-linux-docs/>
> prior to the integration in the kernel 3.2. However, someone needs to
> take into account, that the documentation cannot be applied as in the
> text since there are some changes in the command line syntax for the
> user-space mpls configuration application. The current implementation
> [2] <https://github.com/i-maravic> is many steps forward the old
> mpls-linux regarding forwarding speed, stability and efficiency.
> However there still exist issues that demand testing and resolution.
>
> BR
> George
>
>
> [1]
> http://ontwerpen1.khlim.be/~lrutten/cursussen/comm2/mpls-linux-docs/
> <http://ontwerpen1.khlim.be/%7Elrutten/cursussen/comm2/mpls-linux-docs/>
> [2] https://github.com/i-maravic
>
> On Sep 17, 2012, at 2:41 PM, Daniel STICKNEY <dst...@op...
> <mailto:dst...@op...>> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I wanted to ask if any of you currently use MPLS-Linux in a production
>> network. It is not clear to me if MPLS-Linux is considered stable and
>> mature, with sufficient documentation for widespread deployment, or if
>> it is in a testing and development stage. Thanks in advance for any
>> responses.
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Live Security Virtual Conference
>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond.
>> Discussions
>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in
>> malware
>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls-linux-general mailing list
>> mpl...@li...
>> <mailto:mpl...@li...>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general
>>
>

Dear Daniel, 

Regarding the issue you raise, I would not suggest at this point the use of the current Linux MPLS implementation in a production network. It is still in experimental stage and there is a clear luck of adequate documentation. Effectively, the only helpful documentation (to my knowledge) with UseCases and step through them exists for the older mpls-linux version [1]  prior to the integration in the kernel 3.2. However, someone needs to take into account, that the documentation cannot be applied as in the text since there are some changes in the command line syntax for the user-space mpls configuration application. The current implementation [2] is many steps forward the old mpls-linux regarding forwarding speed, stability and efficiency. However there still exist issues that demand testing and resolution. 

BR
George 


[1] http://ontwerpen1.khlim.be/~lrutten/cursussen/comm2/mpls-linux-docs/
[2] https://github.com/i-maravic

On Sep 17, 2012, at 2:41 PM, Daniel STICKNEY <dst...@op...> wrote:

> Hello all,
> 
> I wanted to ask if any of you currently use MPLS-Linux in a production
> network. It is not clear to me if MPLS-Linux is considered stable and
> mature, with sufficient documentation for widespread deployment, or if
> it is in a testing and development stage. Thanks in advance for any
> responses.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general
> 

--



George K. Xilouris
Associate Researcher		
NCSR Demokritos 
Institute of Informatics and Telecommunications 
P.O. Box 60228 
15310, Agia Paraskevi, Greece 

phone: + (30) 210 650 31 08 
fax: + (30) 210 653 21 75 

Web: http://medianetlab.gr/~xilouris
LinkedIn//Twitter


The information transmitted by this e-mail is exclusively directed to the addressee (person or entity) and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, disclosure, copying, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance upon the contained information, by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this in error, please notify the sender and delete the material from any electronic device.

On Sep 17, 2012, at 2:41 PM, Daniel STICKNEY <dst...@op...> wrote:

> Hello all,
> 
> I wanted to ask if any of you currently use MPLS-Linux in a production
> network. It is not clear to me if MPLS-Linux is considered stable and
> mature, with sufficient documentation for widespread deployment, or if
> it is in a testing and development stage. Thanks in advance for any
> responses.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general
> 

--



George K. Xilouris
Associate Researcher		
NCSR Demokritos 
Institute of Informatics and Telecommunications 
P.O. Box 60228 
15310, Agia Paraskevi, Greece 

phone: + (30) 210 650 31 08 
fax: + (30) 210 653 21 75 

Web: http://medianetlab.gr/~xilouris
LinkedIn//Twitter


The information transmitted by this e-mail is exclusively directed to the addressee (person or entity) and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, disclosure, copying, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance upon the contained information, by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this in error, please notify the sender and delete the material from any electronic device.

Hello all,

I wanted to ask if any of you currently use MPLS-Linux in a production
network. It is not clear to me if MPLS-Linux is considered stable and
mature, with sufficient documentation for widespread deployment, or if
it is in a testing and development stage. Thanks in advance for any
responses.

Daniel

Hello All,

I have OSPF up and running with quagga-0.99.6 on my centOS machine. I would like to know, how can I add mpls and ldp support on top of quagga-0.99.6.

I found patches for mpls-linux and mpls-ldp-portable online, but I dont have any success patching it. Can someone point me to some documentation.

Thanks,

-Deepak

Dear Adrian, thanks for your reply. 

> I remember I did some performance tests a few years ago, and the major speed boost was turning debugging off (speed increase from ~3-4Mbps to 70-80Mbps).
> 
Indeed, turning off the debugging, increases the performance. However, there are a lot kernel exceptions that are still printed from the syslog. 

> In practice I would expect performance to be slightly lower than IPv4 over the same hardware. In theory you would get better performance because of lower lookup tables, but that only applies on specialized ASICs, not on general purpose computers that do things in software. 
> 
The hardware I used is gigabit NICs and the performance I get is not even close. 

> Also, you might have some performance increase if you try to forward traffic for a large destination routing table - e.g. try to populate the routing table with as many routes as you can and measure the routing time for random destination packets, and compare it to switching mpls packets (on a P router) with an equally large label table. For PE routers, performance will be lower, because it needs to do IP lookup to identify the mpls rules to apply, so it will take longer.
> 

The performance that interests me is the highest packet forwarding speed without packet loss. it seems that mpls-linux 3.2 kernel implementation achieves superior performance. Due to some kernel version bindings I wished I could find a solution for the 2.6.xx kernel versions. However the implemented patches have many bugs. 

> Hope it helps,
> 
> Regards
> 
Regards
George 

> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:18 AM, George Xilouris <xil...@ii...> wrote:
> Dear all, 
> 
> I have made some preliminary tests with mpls on kernel 2.6.35.13 which is the last kernel released for mpls-linux for Kernel 2.6 version. I have noticed the following: 
> 
> 1. The performance depends on the ethernet card driver and chipset, currently best performance achieved with Broadcom cards
> 2. The Non-Loss forwarding capability of an LSR router is around 90Mbps for full length UDP packets. The experiments were made with Gigabit cards. 
> 3. Kernel messages were so often (i had mpls debug disabled) that I had to stop the rsyslogd in order not to spend CPU cycles. 
> 4. I increased UDP system memory by modifying the kernel defaults under /proc/sys, no change in the actual performance was observed. 
> 
> So here comes the question, does anyone have any performance numbers or rules of thumb to propose ? What is the best forwarding performance that  I could expect? 
> 
> Best Regards 
> George Xilouris  
> --
> 
> 
> 
> George K. Xilouris
> Associate Researcher		
> NCSR Demokritos 
> Institute of Informatics and Telecommunications 
> P.O. Box 60228 
> 15310, Agia Paraskevi, Greece 
> 
> phone: + (30) 210 650 31 08 
> fax: + (30) 210 653 21 75 
> 
> Web: http://dtlab.iit.demokritos.gr/~xilouris 	
> LinkedIn//Twitter
> 
> 
> The information transmitted by this e-mail is exclusively directed to the addressee (person or entity) and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, disclosure, copying, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance upon the contained information, by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this in error, please notify the sender and delete the material from any electronic device.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general
> 
> 

I remember I did some performance tests a few years ago, and the major
speed boost was turning debugging off (speed increase from ~3-4Mbps to
70-80Mbps).

In practice I would expect performance to be slightly lower than IPv4 over
the same hardware. In theory you would get better performance because of
lower lookup tables, but that only applies on specialized ASICs, not on
general purpose computers that do things in software.

Also, you might have some performance increase if you try to forward
traffic for a large destination routing table - e.g. try to populate the
routing table with as many routes as you can and measure the routing time
for random destination packets, and compare it to switching mpls packets
(on a P router) with an equally large label table. For PE routers,
performance will be lower, because it needs to do IP lookup to identify the
mpls rules to apply, so it will take longer.

Hope it helps,

Regards

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:18 AM, George Xilouris <
xil...@ii...> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I have made some preliminary tests with mpls on kernel 2.6.35.13 which is
> the last kernel released for mpls-linux for Kernel 2.6 version. I have
> noticed the following:
>
> 1. The performance depends on the ethernet card driver and chipset,
> currently best performance achieved with Broadcom cards
> 2. The Non-Loss forwarding capability of an LSR router is around 90Mbps
> for full length UDP packets. The experiments were made with Gigabit cards.
> 3. Kernel messages were so often (i had mpls debug disabled) that I had to
> stop the rsyslogd in order not to spend CPU cycles.
> 4. I increased UDP system memory by modifying the kernel defaults under
> /proc/sys, no change in the actual performance was observed.
>
> So here comes the question, does anyone have any performance numbers or
> rules of thumb to propose ? What is the best forwarding performance that  I
> could expect?
>
> Best Regards
> George Xilouris
> --
> [image: Demokritos Site] <http://www.iit.demokritos.gr/>
>
>
> *George K. Xilouris*
> Associate Researcher
> NCSR Demokritos
> Institute of Informatics and Telecommunications
> P.O. Box 60228
> 15310, Agia Paraskevi, Greece
>
> phone: + (30) 210 650 31 08
> fax: + (30) 210 653 21 75
>
> Web: http://dtlab.iit.demokritos.gr/~xilouris
> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/xilouris>//Twitter<http://twitter.com/xilouris>
>
> The information transmitted by this e-mail is exclusively directed to the
> addressee (person or entity) and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> material. Any review, disclosure, copying, retransmission, dissemination,
> distribution, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance upon
> the contained information, by persons or entities other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this in error,
> please notify the sender and delete the material from any electronic device.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general
>
>

Dear all, 

I have made some preliminary tests with mpls on kernel 2.6.35.13 which is the last kernel released for mpls-linux for Kernel 2.6 version. I have noticed the following: 

1. The performance depends on the ethernet card driver and chipset, currently best performance achieved with Broadcom cards
2. The Non-Loss forwarding capability of an LSR router is around 90Mbps for full length UDP packets. The experiments were made with Gigabit cards. 
3. Kernel messages were so often (i had mpls debug disabled) that I had to stop the rsyslogd in order not to spend CPU cycles. 
4. I increased UDP system memory by modifying the kernel defaults under /proc/sys, no change in the actual performance was observed. 

So here comes the question, does anyone have any performance numbers or rules of thumb to propose ? What is the best forwarding performance that  I could expect? 

Best Regards 
George Xilouris  
--



George K. Xilouris
Associate Researcher		
NCSR Demokritos 
Institute of Informatics and Telecommunications 
P.O. Box 60228 
15310, Agia Paraskevi, Greece 

phone: + (30) 210 650 31 08 
fax: + (30) 210 653 21 75 

Web: http://dtlab.iit.demokritos.gr/~xilouris 	
LinkedIn//Twitter


The information transmitted by this e-mail is exclusively directed to the addressee (person or entity) and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, disclosure, copying, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance upon the contained information, by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this in error, please notify the sender and delete the material from any electronic device.

Hi Adrian:

Thank you for the info, I will explore this further.

Much Thanks
Morgan Yang

From: Adrian Popa [mailto:adr...@gm...]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 10:36 PM
To: Morgan Yang
Cc: mpl...@li...
Subject: Re: [mpls-linux-general] multiple mpls header (nested mpls) support

Yes, I remember it's possible. You just add multiple push commands, to add multiple labels when configuring with the mpls command. I believe there is also an example of this in the VPN examples, where it pushes two labels onto the packet.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Morgan Yang <Mor...@ra...<mailto:Mor...@ra...>> wrote:
Hi All:

I am in need to simulate traffic with multiple mpls headers (nested mpls trunk traffic) on linux. Can this be achieved using mpls-linux?

Much Thanks
Morgan Yang


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
mpls-linux-general mailing list
mpl...@li...<mailto:mpl...@li...>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general

Yes, I remember it's possible. You just add multiple push commands, to add
multiple labels when configuring with the mpls command. I believe there is
also an example of this in the VPN examples, where it pushes two labels
onto the packet.

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Morgan Yang <Mor...@ra...>wrote:

>  Hi All:****
>
> ** **
>
> I am in need to simulate traffic with multiple mpls headers (nested mpls
> trunk traffic) on linux. Can this be achieved using mpls-linux?****
>
> ** **
>
> Much Thanks****
>
> Morgan Yang****
>
> ** **
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general
>
>

Hi All:

I am in need to simulate traffic with multiple mpls headers (nested mpls trunk traffic) on linux. Can this be achieved using mpls-linux?

Much Thanks
Morgan Yang

Hi all,
my name is Jodie , I'm from El Salvador.
I have to do an MPLS project for the university, and Im working with your
documentations but I had so many troubles with it. I dont know what to do.
I tried to used the debian kernel 2.6.32.5  but I always have problems when
I compiled it.
I tried with slackware, and supposedly works well, has mpls support for
IPV4 and IPV6... but when I used the mpls commands the computer always
hangs up!
I need something that works well, i need to do at least deploy a network
transport MPLS in IP and IPv6.
As extras can include traffic engineering, VPNs, other transport protocols,
interfacing with proprietary technologies, etc..

there is any other form to do this?
please I need help!



-- 
"I may make you feel but I can't make you think"
THICK AS A BRICK

Thanks for replay

I tried but no success, Can you check it plz ?

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Marcelo Amaral <ma...@la...>wrote:

> You need to use the command line git clone
>
> Best regards!
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Ballu ballu <dev...@gm...>wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>>
>> I am trying to download code of mpls-linux using git link <git://
>> mpls-linux.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/mpls-linux/mpls-linux (read-only)>
>> given at mpls-linux site.
>>
>> but no success, can some one guide me how to download it ..
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
>> The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
>> is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
>> Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls-linux-general mailing list
>> mpl...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> ====================================================================
> Marcelo Carneiro do Amaral
> http://www.larc.usp.br
>
>
> LARC - Laboratório de Arquitetura e Redes de Computadores
> PCS - Departamento de Engenharia de Computação e Sistemas Digitais
> EPUSP - Escola Politécnica da USP
> USP - Universidade de São Paulo
> ====================================================================
>
>
>
> ALERTA: A informação contida nesta mensagem é confidencial, e destinada ao
> uso
> exclusivo do destinatário. Caso essa correspondência tenha sido recebida
> por equívoco,
> notifico que sua divulgação é proibida por lei, e solicito que o remetente
> seja comunicado
> imediatamente, via e-mail.  Obrigado.
>
> NOTICE:  This transmittal and/or attachments may be a privileged or
> confidential information.
>  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you
> have received this
>  transmittal in error. Any review, dissemination, distribution or copying
> of this transmittal is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
> notify sender by return
> e-mail.
>
>
>

You need to use the command line git clone

Best regards!

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Ballu ballu <dev...@gm...> wrote:

> Hi all
>
>
> I am trying to download code of mpls-linux using git link <git://
> mpls-linux.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/mpls-linux/mpls-linux (read-only)>
> given at mpls-linux site.
>
> but no success, can some one guide me how to download it ..
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
> The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
> is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
> Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general
>
>


-- 

====================================================================
Marcelo Carneiro do Amaral
http://www.larc.usp.br

LARC - Laboratório de Arquitetura e Redes de Computadores
PCS - Departamento de Engenharia de Computação e Sistemas Digitais
EPUSP - Escola Politécnica da USP
USP - Universidade de São Paulo
====================================================================



ALERTA: A informação contida nesta mensagem é confidencial, e destinada ao
uso
exclusivo do destinatário. Caso essa correspondência tenha sido recebida
por equívoco,
notifico que sua divulgação é proibida por lei, e solicito que o remetente
seja comunicado
imediatamente, via e-mail.  Obrigado.

NOTICE:  This transmittal and/or attachments may be a privileged or
confidential information.
 If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you
have received this
 transmittal in error. Any review, dissemination, distribution or copying
of this transmittal is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
notify sender by return
e-mail.

Hi all


I am trying to download code of mpls-linux using git link <git://
mpls-linux.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/mpls-linux/mpls-linux (read-only)>
given at mpls-linux site.

but no success, can some one guide me how to download it ..


Regards

Igor, do you now if there is some working implementation of RSVP-TE, even
if it is not stable yet?

I want to set up a test bed of a network management system, which one
defines the best paths and backup paths according a policy.
To perform the usage of the best paths, i want to set explicit routed LSP.
However i do not want to set the LSP router by router,
instead a want to use a label distribution protocol, such as the RSVP and
also SNMP to talk with the routers.

Do you can advise me of some work to help me? Another label distribution
protocol also can be a option for me?

Warm regards.

2012/1/16 Igor Maravić <ig...@et...>

> It's not operational!
> BR
> Igor
>
> 2012/1/16 Marcelo Amaral <ma...@la...>:
> > Does someone know if the implementation of the RSVP-TE protocol is
> already
> > available to use?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --
> >
> > ====================================================================
> > Marcelo Carneiro do Amaral
> >
> >
> > http://www.larc.usp.br
> > LARC - Laboratório de Arquitetura e Redes de Computadores
> > PCS - Departamento de Engenharia de Computação e Sistemas Digitais
> > EPUSP - Escola Politécnica da USP
> >
> >
> > USP - Universidade de São Paulo
> > ====================================================================
> >
> >
> >
> > ALERTA: A informação contida nesta mensagem é confidencial, e destinada
> ao
> > uso
> > exclusivo do destinatário. Caso essa correspondência tenha sido recebida
> por
> > equívoco,
> > notifico que sua divulgação é proibida por lei, e solicito que o
> remetente
> > seja comunicado
> > imediatamente, via e-mail.  Obrigado.
> >
> > NOTICE:  This transmittal and/or attachments may be a privileged or
> > confidential information.
> >  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you
> > have received this
> >  transmittal in error. Any review, dissemination, distribution or
> copying of
> > this transmittal is
> > strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
> > notify sender by return
> > e-mail.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > RSA(R) Conference 2012
> > Mar 27 - Feb 2
> > Save $400 by Jan. 27
> > Register now!
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpls-linux-general mailing list
> > mpl...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general
> >
>



-- 

====================================================================
Marcelo Carneiro do Amaral
http://www.larc.usp.br

LARC - Laboratório de Arquitetura e Redes de Computadores
PCS - Departamento de Engenharia de Computação e Sistemas Digitais
EPUSP - Escola Politécnica da USP
USP - Universidade de São Paulo
====================================================================



ALERTA: A informação contida nesta mensagem é confidencial, e destinada ao
uso
exclusivo do destinatário. Caso essa correspondência tenha sido recebida
por equívoco,
notifico que sua divulgação é proibida por lei, e solicito que o remetente
seja comunicado
imediatamente, via e-mail.  Obrigado.

NOTICE:  This transmittal and/or attachments may be a privileged or
confidential information.
 If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you
have received this
 transmittal in error. Any review, dissemination, distribution or copying
of this transmittal is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
notify sender by return
e-mail.

It's not operational!
BR
Igor

2012/1/16 Marcelo Amaral <ma...@la...>:
> Does someone know if the implementation of the RSVP-TE protocol is already
> available to use?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
>
> ====================================================================
> Marcelo Carneiro do Amaral
>
>
> http://www.larc.usp.br
> LARC - Laboratório de Arquitetura e Redes de Computadores
> PCS - Departamento de Engenharia de Computação e Sistemas Digitais
> EPUSP - Escola Politécnica da USP
>
>
> USP - Universidade de São Paulo
> ====================================================================
>
>
>
> ALERTA: A informação contida nesta mensagem é confidencial, e destinada ao
> uso
> exclusivo do destinatário. Caso essa correspondência tenha sido recebida por
> equívoco,
> notifico que sua divulgação é proibida por lei, e solicito que o remetente
> seja comunicado
> imediatamente, via e-mail.  Obrigado.
>
> NOTICE:  This transmittal and/or attachments may be a privileged or
> confidential information.
>  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you
> have received this
>  transmittal in error. Any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of
> this transmittal is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
> notify sender by return
> e-mail.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> RSA(R) Conference 2012
> Mar 27 - Feb 2
> Save $400 by Jan. 27
> Register now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-linux-general mailing list
> mpl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mpls-linux-general
>

Does someone know if the implementation of the RSVP-TE protocol is already
available to use?

Thanks!

-- 

====================================================================
Marcelo Carneiro do Amaral
http://www.larc.usp.br
LARC - Laboratório de Arquitetura e Redes de Computadores
PCS - Departamento de Engenharia de Computação e Sistemas Digitais
EPUSP - Escola Politécnica da USP

USP - Universidade de São Paulo
====================================================================



ALERTA: A informação contida nesta mensagem é confidencial, e destinada ao
uso
exclusivo do destinatário. Caso essa correspondência tenha sido recebida
por equívoco,
notifico que sua divulgação é proibida por lei, e solicito que o remetente
seja comunicado
imediatamente, via e-mail.  Obrigado.

NOTICE:  This transmittal and/or attachments may be a privileged or
confidential information.
 If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you
have received this
 transmittal in error. Any review, dissemination, distribution or copying
of this transmittal is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
notify sender by return
e-mail.

http://distribuidordesemijoias.com.br/atendimento/stats/month/oliver.php?hello50.php