clonezilla-live Mailing List for Clonezilla

Maybe you can share us your pxelinux.cfg so that we can give it a try here.
BTW, in addition to mailing list, people use Clonezilla forum more 
frequently:
https://sourceforge.net/p/clonezilla/discussion/
Next time maybe you can use that. It's actually easier for others to 
reply and refer in the future.

Steven

On 2024/8/29 14:30, Richard Chang wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> First of all, thank you for this wonderful piece of software. I really 
> love its functionality.
>
> I am trying to configure a server to PXE boot from another computer 
> and then start its own "lite-server" for mass deployment.
>
> I am trying to pxe-boot because I can't carry USB flash drives to the 
> DC where the server is located. So, I can have a PXE boot server in my 
> laptop and network boot the server I want to image from, to start its 
> own "lite-server" to mass deploy to the other servers.
>
> I can network boot the source server, and everything is fine. But I 
> can't start the "Clonezilla live lite-server" with its own dhcp server 
> dedicated to a particular interface.  When I choose to start the 
> live-lite server option, it asks me if I want to netboot the client 
> machines or use local boot media or both. When I chose netboot or 
> both, I get the option to start a new dhcpd service in LAN. But I 
> don't get the option to start it dedicated to a particular interface. 
> It seems to start the dhcpd service considering all the interfaces. 
> Which is something I don't want to do.
>
> I would like something like this.
>
> Laptop  >>> PXE BOOT >>>  |eth0 = SOURCE SERVER = eth1| >>> PXE BOOT 
> >>> OTHER CLIENT SYSTEMS.
>
> Hope I could make you understand my requirement.
>
> Thanks & regards,
>
> Richard.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clonezilla-live mailing list
> Clo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live

-- 
Steven Shiau <steven _at_ stevenshiau org>
Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 4096R/163E3FB0
Fingerprint: EB1D D5BF 6F88 820B BCF5  356C 8E94 C9CD 163E 3FB0

Hi Steven,

First of all, thank you for this wonderful piece of software. I really 
love its functionality.

I am trying to configure a server to PXE boot from another computer and 
then start its own "lite-server" for mass deployment.

I am trying to pxe-boot because I can't carry USB flash drives to the DC 
where the server is located. So, I can have a PXE boot server in my 
laptop and network boot the server I want to image from, to start its 
own "lite-server" to mass deploy to the other servers.

I can network boot the source server, and everything is fine. But I 
can't start the "Clonezilla live lite-server" with its own dhcp server 
dedicated to a particular interface.  When I choose to start the 
live-lite server option, it asks me if I want to netboot the client 
machines or use local boot media or both. When I chose netboot or both, 
I get the option to start a new dhcpd service in LAN. But I don't get 
the option to start it dedicated to a particular interface. It seems to 
start the dhcpd service considering all the interfaces. Which is 
something I don't want to do.

I would like something like this.

Laptop  >>> PXE BOOT >>>  |eth0 = SOURCE SERVER = eth1| >>> PXE BOOT >>> 
OTHER CLIENT SYSTEMS.

Hope I could make you understand my requirement.

Thanks & regards,

Richard.

Hi Steven,

First of all, thank you for this wonderful piece of software. I really 
love its functionality.

I am trying to configure a server to PXE boot from another computer and 
then start its own "lite-server" for mass deployment.

I am trying to pxe-boot because I can't carry USB flash drives to the DC 
where the server is located. So, I can have a PXE boot server in my 
laptop and network boot the server I want to image from, to start its 
own "lite-server" to mass deploy to the other servers.

I can network boot the source server, and everything is fine. But I 
can't start the "Clonezilla live lite-server" with its own dhcp server 
dedicated to a particular interface.  When I choose to start the 
live-lite server option, it asks me if I want to netboot the client 
machines or use local boot media or both. When I chose netboot or both, 
I get the option to start a new dhcpd service in LAN. But I don't get 
the option to start it dedicated to a particular interface. It seems to 
start the dhcpd service across all the interfaces. Which is something I 
don't want to do.

I would like something like this.

Laptop  >>> PXE BOOT >>>  |eth0 = SOURCE SERVER = eth1| >>> PXE BOOT >>> 
OTHER CLIENT SYSTEMS.

Hope I could make you understand my requirement.

I am using the clonezilla-live-20240715-noble-amd64.iso version.

Thanks & regards,

Richard.

Basically you can follow this:
https://clonezilla.org/create_clonezilla_live_from_scratch.php
though It's outdated.
Or you can check this:
https://drbl.org/fine-print.php?path=./faq/2_System/81_add_prog_in_filesystem-squashfs.faq#81_add_prog_in_filesystem-squashfs.faq

Steven

On 2024/8/10 02:57, natalieclay via Clonezilla-live wrote:
> Hello, I'm Natalie, I would like to start working on some new features 
> to the live disk( S3, EFS ) support. I can find the main programs use 
> to provide the functions of clonezilla, However I cannot find the 
> Scripts that make up the "GUI" where are they maintained, and where 
> are the build files for the live iso.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clonezilla-live mailing list
> Clo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live

-- 
Steven Shiau <steven _at_ stevenshiau org>
Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 4096R/163E3FB0
Fingerprint: EB1D D5BF 6F88 820B BCF5  356C 8E94 C9CD 163E 3FB0

Hello, I'm Natalie, I would like to start working on some new features to the live disk( S3, EFS ) support. I can find the main programs use to provide the functions of clonezilla, However I cannot find the Scripts that make up the "GUI" where are they maintained, and where are the build files for the live iso.

Stable Clonezilla live 3.1.3-16 is released. For more info, please check:
https://sourceforge.net/p/clonezilla/news/2024/07/stable-clonezilla-live-313-16-released/

Steven

-- 
Steven Shiau <steven _at_ stevenshiau org>
Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 4096R/163E3FB0
Fingerprint: EB1D D5BF 6F88 820B BCF5  356C 8E94 C9CD 163E 3FB0

Stable Clonezilla live 3.1.3-11 is released. For more info, please check:
https://sourceforge.net/p/clonezilla/news/2024/07/stable-clonezilla-live-313-11-released/

Steven

-- 
Steven Shiau <steven _at_ stevenshiau org>
Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 4096R/163E3FB0
Fingerprint: EB1D D5BF 6F88 820B BCF5  356C 8E94 C9CD 163E 3FB0

In that case, you can clone that 3 times. I.e., clone 1st partition, 
then 2nd partition, and 3 partition.
You can use the command line to do that. When you finish the 1st one, it 
prompts a green command, and you can just replace the source and 
destination partitions in that command.

Steven

On 2024/5/1 00:20, Jon Forrest wrote:
> I have a large ext4 format source drive with 7 partitions.
> I need to clone only the first 3 partitions to a
> smaller target drive.
>
> I know how to clone the entire source drive, and
> I know how to clone 1 partition, but I don't
> know how to clone only 3 partitions.
>
> Any advice?
>
> Cordially,
> Jon Forrest
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clonezilla-live mailing list
> Clo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live

-- 
Steven Shiau <steven _at_ stevenshiau org>
Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 4096R/163E3FB0
Fingerprint: EB1D D5BF 6F88 820B BCF5  356C 8E94 C9CD 163E 3FB0

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>I'm sure there might be a better way, but cloning the entire disk
      and then deleting the unwanted partitions on the destination disk
      would accomplish this.</p>
    <p>- Robert<br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/30/2024 12:20 PM, Jon Forrest
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:v0r5nk$12pj$1...@ci...">I
      have a large ext4 format source drive with 7 partitions.
      <br>
      I need to clone only the first 3 partitions to a
      <br>
      smaller target drive.
      <br>
      <br>
      I know how to clone the entire source drive, and
      <br>
      I know how to clone 1 partition, but I don't
      <br>
      know how to clone only 3 partitions.
      <br>
      <br>
      Any advice?
      <br>
      <br>
      Cordially,
      <br>
      Jon Forrest
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      _______________________________________________
      <br>
      Clonezilla-live mailing list
      <br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Clo...@li...">Clo...@li...</a>
      <br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live</a>
      <br>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Robert K Coffman Jr.
Info From Data Corp.
3307249000
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:su...@in...">su...@in...</a></pre>
  </body>
</html>

I have a large ext4 format source drive with 7 partitions.
I need to clone only the first 3 partitions to a
smaller target drive.

I know how to clone the entire source drive, and
I know how to clone 1 partition, but I don't
know how to clone only 3 partitions.

Any advice?

Cordially,
Jon Forrest

OK, we will find some time to understand that.
Thanks.

Steven

On 2024/4/21 03:28, James Epp wrote:
> I don't have any details to add unfortunately. I'd assume following the
> Samba "upstream" project and developments (if any) on this topic is the
> best place for the Clonezilla maintainers/volunteers to focus on if
> there's any interest.
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 10:09 PM Steven Shiau <st...@na...> 
> wrote:
>
>     Hi James,
>     Thanks for your feedback. Actually we are not familiar with MS
>     Windows.
>     Do you know any GNU/Linux docs that address the issue you
>     mentioned? It
>     would be great if the samba doc is specially for Debian or Ubuntu.
>
>     Regards,
>     Steven
>
>     On 2024/4/7 22:18, James Epp wrote:
>     > Thought I'd throw this thought into the wild for anyone to pick
>     up and
>     > run with. This doesn't directly affect me.
>     >
>     > In Clonezilla today (3.1.2-9) when setting up a connection to a SMB
>     > share for device-image mode, it prompts for a security mode (auto vs
>     > ntlm).
>     >
>     > What auto actually does under the hood is a bit unclear. At least in
>     > Microsoft land (and I'm not a good person to speak on Windows auth
>     > internals), you have three authentication methods - Negotiate,
>     > Kerberos, and NTLM. NTLM is then broken down into NTLM2 and NTLM1
>     > (hopefully no  one is using NTLM1 these days). Negotiate tries
>     Kerberos
>     > first and fallsback to NTLM2 if Kerberos fails.
>     >
>     > Microsoft recently made announcements that they're going to try to
>     > phase out NTLM entirely from Windows. This could impact Clonezilla
>     > users who use Microsoft SMB shares. At some point in the future - by
>     > default - Kerberos may be the only method for authentication,
>     and it's
>     > not clear if Clonezilla supports Kerberos for authentication today.
>     >
>     > Obviously this can turn into a rabbit hole quickly - new firewall
>     > requirements, time becomes significantly more important, etc etc.
>     >
>     > I'm not familiar at all with MIT KRB5 on GNU/Linux distros so as
>     > mentioned before, I am just throwing this out there for someone
>     who's
>     > smarter than I to consider.
>     >
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Clonezilla-live mailing list
>     > Clo...@li...
>     > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live
>
>     -- 
>     Steven Shiau <steven _at_ stevenshiau org>
>     Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 4096R/163E3FB0
>     Fingerprint: EB1D D5BF 6F88 820B BCF5  356C 8E94 C9CD 163E 3FB0
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Clonezilla-live mailing list
>     Clo...@li...
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live
>
-- 
Steven Shiau <steven _at_ stevenshiau org>
Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 4096R/163E3FB0
Fingerprint: EB1D D5BF 6F88 820B BCF5  356C 8E94 C9CD 163E 3FB0

I don't have any details to add unfortunately. I'd assume following the
Samba "upstream" project and developments (if any) on this topic is the
best place for the Clonezilla maintainers/volunteers to focus on if
there's any interest.

On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 10:09 PM Steven Shiau <st...@na...> wrote:

> Hi James,
> Thanks for your feedback. Actually we are not familiar with MS Windows.
> Do you know any GNU/Linux docs that address the issue you mentioned? It
> would be great if the samba doc is specially for Debian or Ubuntu.
>
> Regards,
> Steven
>
> On 2024/4/7 22:18, James Epp wrote:
> > Thought I'd throw this thought into the wild for anyone to pick up and
> > run with. This doesn't directly affect me.
> >
> > In Clonezilla today (3.1.2-9) when setting up a connection to a SMB
> > share for device-image mode, it prompts for a security mode (auto vs
> > ntlm).
> >
> > What auto actually does under the hood is a bit unclear. At least in
> > Microsoft land (and I'm not a good person to speak on Windows auth
> > internals), you have three authentication methods - Negotiate,
> > Kerberos, and NTLM. NTLM is then broken down into NTLM2 and NTLM1
> > (hopefully no  one is using NTLM1 these days). Negotiate tries Kerberos
> > first and fallsback to NTLM2 if Kerberos fails.
> >
> > Microsoft recently made announcements that they're going to try to
> > phase out NTLM entirely from Windows. This could impact Clonezilla
> > users who use Microsoft SMB shares. At some point in the future - by
> > default - Kerberos may be the only method for authentication, and it's
> > not clear if Clonezilla supports Kerberos for authentication today.
> >
> > Obviously this can turn into a rabbit hole quickly - new firewall
> > requirements, time becomes significantly more important, etc etc.
> >
> > I'm not familiar at all with MIT KRB5 on GNU/Linux distros so as
> > mentioned before, I am just throwing this out there for someone who's
> > smarter than I to consider.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Clonezilla-live mailing list
> > Clo...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live
>
> --
> Steven Shiau <steven _at_ stevenshiau org>
> Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 4096R/163E3FB0
> Fingerprint: EB1D D5BF 6F88 820B BCF5  356C 8E94 C9CD 163E 3FB0
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clonezilla-live mailing list
> Clo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live
>

Ubuntu 10.04 is 14 years ago... So DRBL/Clonezilla won't be able to run 
that.
Any reason you can not use Clonezilla live to do that?
If you want to use server function, you can try:
1. https://clonezilla.org/clonezilla-SE/use_clonezilla_live_in_drbl.php
2. 
https://clonezilla.org//fine-print-live-doc.php?path=clonezilla-live/doc/11_lite_server

Steven

On 2024/4/6 02:47, Jon Forrest wrote:
> For reasons that are too sad to describe, I need to run Clonezilla
> on an old (e.g. 10.04) running Ubuntu system. The disk I need
> to clone is *not* used for the system so I don't have to worry
> about those issues, and I'd like to do this without taking down
> the server.
>
> I tried
>
>     # apt-get install clonezilla
>
> but I got
>
>     E: Couldn't find package clonezilla
>
> This is no surprise given the age of this system.
>
> I tried downloading Clonezilla from https://clonezilla.org/
> but the only options I see are to download an .iso or a
> .zip. I tried the .zip, hoping I'd find the Clonezilla
> executable to I could copy to the running system.
> But, I didn't find any such thing.
>
> Any ideas where I could find a clonezilla .deb for
> the lucid release of Ubuntu? I tried looking at
> the Ubuntu repositories but I don't know how
> to navigate them.
>
> Cordially,
> Jon Forrest
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clonezilla-live mailing list
> Clo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live

-- 
Steven Shiau <steven _at_ stevenshiau org>
Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 4096R/163E3FB0
Fingerprint: EB1D D5BF 6F88 820B BCF5  356C 8E94 C9CD 163E 3FB0

Hi James,
Thanks for your feedback. Actually we are not familiar with MS Windows.
Do you know any GNU/Linux docs that address the issue you mentioned? It 
would be great if the samba doc is specially for Debian or Ubuntu.

Regards,
Steven

On 2024/4/7 22:18, James Epp wrote:
> Thought I'd throw this thought into the wild for anyone to pick up and
> run with. This doesn't directly affect me.
>
> In Clonezilla today (3.1.2-9) when setting up a connection to a SMB
> share for device-image mode, it prompts for a security mode (auto vs
> ntlm).
>
> What auto actually does under the hood is a bit unclear. At least in
> Microsoft land (and I'm not a good person to speak on Windows auth
> internals), you have three authentication methods - Negotiate,
> Kerberos, and NTLM. NTLM is then broken down into NTLM2 and NTLM1
> (hopefully no  one is using NTLM1 these days). Negotiate tries Kerberos
> first and fallsback to NTLM2 if Kerberos fails.
>
> Microsoft recently made announcements that they're going to try to
> phase out NTLM entirely from Windows. This could impact Clonezilla
> users who use Microsoft SMB shares. At some point in the future - by
> default - Kerberos may be the only method for authentication, and it's
> not clear if Clonezilla supports Kerberos for authentication today.
>
> Obviously this can turn into a rabbit hole quickly - new firewall
> requirements, time becomes significantly more important, etc etc.
>
> I'm not familiar at all with MIT KRB5 on GNU/Linux distros so as
> mentioned before, I am just throwing this out there for someone who's
> smarter than I to consider.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clonezilla-live mailing list
> Clo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live

-- 
Steven Shiau <steven _at_ stevenshiau org>
Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 4096R/163E3FB0
Fingerprint: EB1D D5BF 6F88 820B BCF5  356C 8E94 C9CD 163E 3FB0

Stable Clonezilla live 3.1.2-22 is released. For more info, please check:
https://sourceforge.net/p/clonezilla/news/2024/04/stable-clonezilla-live-312-22-released/

Steven

-- 
Steven Shiau <steven _at_ stevenshiau org>
Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 4096R/163E3FB0
Fingerprint: EB1D D5BF 6F88 820B BCF5  356C 8E94 C9CD 163E 3FB0

Thought I'd throw this thought into the wild for anyone to pick up and
run with. This doesn't directly affect me.

In Clonezilla today (3.1.2-9) when setting up a connection to a SMB
share for device-image mode, it prompts for a security mode (auto vs
ntlm).

What auto actually does under the hood is a bit unclear. At least in
Microsoft land (and I'm not a good person to speak on Windows auth
internals), you have three authentication methods - Negotiate,
Kerberos, and NTLM. NTLM is then broken down into NTLM2 and NTLM1
(hopefully no  one is using NTLM1 these days). Negotiate tries Kerberos
first and fallsback to NTLM2 if Kerberos fails.

Microsoft recently made announcements that they're going to try to
phase out NTLM entirely from Windows. This could impact Clonezilla
users who use Microsoft SMB shares. At some point in the future - by
default - Kerberos may be the only method for authentication, and it's
not clear if Clonezilla supports Kerberos for authentication today.

Obviously this can turn into a rabbit hole quickly - new firewall
requirements, time becomes significantly more important, etc etc.

I'm not familiar at all with MIT KRB5 on GNU/Linux distros so as
mentioned before, I am just throwing this out there for someone who's
smarter than I to consider.

On Fri, 2024-04-05 at 11:47 -0700, Jon Forrest wrote:
> For reasons that are too sad to describe, I need to run Clonezilla
> on an old (e.g. 10.04) running Ubuntu system. The disk I need
> to clone is *not* used for the system so I don't have to worry
> about those issues, and I'd like to do this without taking down
> the server.
> 
> I tried
> 
>         # apt-get install clonezilla
> 
> but I got
> 
>         E: Couldn't find package clonezilla
> 
> This is no surprise given the age of this system.
> 
> I tried downloading Clonezilla from https://clonezilla.org/
> but the only options I see are to download an .iso or a
> .zip. I tried the .zip, hoping I'd find the Clonezilla
> executable to I could copy to the running system.
> But, I didn't find any such thing.
> 
> Any ideas where I could find a clonezilla .deb for
> the lucid release of Ubuntu? I tried looking at
> the Ubuntu repositories but I don't know how
> to navigate them.
> 
> Cordially,
> Jon Forrest
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Clonezilla-live mailing list
> Clo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live



Hi Jon!

Please forgive me if I am being presumptuous for replying to your
query.

May I ask why you do not want to "take down the server"? 

If you can possibly take down the server, then booting into Clonezilla
Live should work well (but practice first if you have never used it
before!). 

I have used Clonezilla Live for years to copy partitions and entire
(non-running) systems without any problems. Works fine for me. 

But I have never even tried to use it on a running system (i.e., your
Ubuntu install). And do not intend to do so. So it may not work, and
might make things worse. 

Both clonezilla and partclone .debs do appear to be in the Debian 12
Stable repositories:

sudo aptitude show clonezilla 
Package: clonezilla                      
Version: 5.3.17-2
State: not installed
Priority: optional
Section: admin
Maintainer: Georges Khaznadar <geo...@de...>
Architecture: all
Uncompressed Size: 3,507 k
Depends: drbl (> 2.30.5-1~), file, pigz, gdisk, bc, dialog, fdisk |
util-linux (< 2.29.2-3~),
         e2fsprogs
Recommends: partclone, partimage
Suggests: openssh-client, cifs-utils, udpcast, sshfs
Description: bare metal backup and recovery of disk drives
 Clonezilla is an OpenSource clone system (OCS) solution with
unicasting and multicasting. 
 
 Clonezilla, based on drbl, partclone and udpcast, allows you to do
bare metal backup and
 recovery. This package provides Clonezilla SE (server edition) which
is for massive deployment:
 it can clone many (40 plus!) computers simultaneously. 
 
 Clonezilla saves and restores only used blocks in the harddisk. This
increases the clone
 efficiency. At the NCHC's Classroom C, Clonezilla SE was used to clone
41 computers
 simultaneously. It took only about 10 minutes to clone a 5.6 GBytes
system image to all 41
 computers via multicasting.
Homepage: https://clonezilla.org
Tags: admin::backup, admin::filesystem, admin::recovery,
hardware::storage,
      implemented-in::shell, interface::commandline, role::program,
scope::utility,
      use::storing, works-with::archive

AND: 

sudo aptitude show partclone
Package: partclone                       
Version: 0.3.23+repack-1
State: not installed
Priority: optional
Section: admin
Maintainer: Georges Khaznadar <geo...@de...>
Architecture: amd64
Uncompressed Size: 2,620 k
Depends: libblkid1 (>= 2.17.2), libc6 (>= 2.34), libext2fs2 (>= 1.42),
libncursesw6 (>= 6),
         libntfs-3g89, libssl3 (>= 3.0.0), libtinfo6 (>= 6), libuuid1
(>= 2.16)
Description: Utility to clone and restore a partition
 Partclone is a project like the well-known backup utility "Partition
Image" a.k.a. partimage. 
 
 Partclone provides utilities to back up used blocks and design for
highest compatibility with
 file system using supported libraries like e2fslibs. 
 
 check the project website for more details http://partclone.org
Homepage: http://partclone.org/
Tags: admin::backup, admin::filesystem, admin::recovery,
hardware::storage, implemented-in::c,
      interface::commandline, role::program, scope::utility,
uitoolkit::ncurses

I have never used either.

I don't know if they would work in Ubuntu, and trying to do so is NOT
recommended. 

Finally - never listen to anything I say about anything! ("If it
breaks, you get to keep both pieces!")

For reasons that are too sad to describe, I need to run Clonezilla
on an old (e.g. 10.04) running Ubuntu system. The disk I need
to clone is *not* used for the system so I don't have to worry
about those issues, and I'd like to do this without taking down
the server.

I tried

	# apt-get install clonezilla

but I got

	E: Couldn't find package clonezilla

This is no surprise given the age of this system.

I tried downloading Clonezilla from https://clonezilla.org/
but the only options I see are to download an .iso or a
.zip. I tried the .zip, hoping I'd find the Clonezilla
executable to I could copy to the running system.
But, I didn't find any such thing.

Any ideas where I could find a clonezilla .deb for
the lucid release of Ubuntu? I tried looking at
the Ubuntu repositories but I don't know how
to navigate them.

Cordially,
Jon Forrest

Stable Clonezilla live 3.1.2-9 is released. For more info, please check:
https://sourceforge.net/p/clonezilla/news/2024/02/stable-clonezilla-live-312-9-released-/

Steven

-- 
Steven Shiau <steven _at_ stevenshiau org>
Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 4096R/163E3FB0
Fingerprint: EB1D D5BF 6F88 820B BCF5  356C 8E94 C9CD 163E 3FB0

There are many backup image files in the directory. To make it easier for me to manage, I had zipped up the entire directory into 1 single file. Purpose is to prevent accidental deletion of backup image files in the backup directory. Since there are so many files in the backup directory, it would have been very easy to have accidentally deleted 1 or more files, rendering the backup unusable and unrestorable.

Regards,

Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Targeted Individual in Singapore


On Sunday, January 28th, 2024 at 4:40 PM, Steven Shiau <st...@na...> wrote:

> I do not think we will change that. The reason for using a directory as
> an image is it's easier for us to expand or add new features.
> Everything in a directory is so clear and easy to identify its content.
> In GNU/Linux, a directory is just like a file. If you really need to
> make them as a single file, just tar it.
> 
> Steven
> 
> On 1/27/24 12:29, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming via Clonezilla-live wrote:
> 
> > Subject: Feature Request for Clonezilla
> > 
> > Good day from Singapore,
> > 
> > I notice that when Clonzilla clones harddisks, it generates many backup image files. Too many.
> > 
> > Is it possible for Clonezilla to generate only 1 backup image file like what Acronis True Image/Cyber Protect Home Office does?
> > 
> > Thank you.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
> > Targeted Individual in Singapore
> > Blogs:
> > https://tdtemcerts.blogspot.com
> > https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com
> > GIMP also stands for Government-Induced Medical Problems.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Clonezilla-live mailing list
> > Clo...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live
> 
> 
> --
> Steven Shiau <steven at stevenshiau org>
> 
> Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 4096R/163E3FB0
> Fingerprint: EB1D D5BF 6F88 820B BCF5 356C 8E94 C9CD 163E 3FB0
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Clonezilla-live mailing list
> Clo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live

I do not think we will change that. The reason for using a directory as 
an image is it's easier for us to expand or add new features.
Everything in a directory is so clear and easy to identify its content.
In GNU/Linux, a directory is just like a file. If you really need to 
make them as a single file, just tar it.

Steven

On 1/27/24 12:29, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming via Clonezilla-live wrote:
> Subject: Feature Request for Clonezilla
>
> Good day from Singapore,
>
> I notice that when Clonzilla clones harddisks, it generates many backup image files. Too many.
>
> Is it possible for Clonezilla to generate only 1 backup image file like what Acronis True Image/Cyber Protect Home Office does?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
> Targeted Individual in Singapore
> Blogs:
> https://tdtemcerts.blogspot.com
> https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com
> GIMP also stands for Government-Induced Medical Problems.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clonezilla-live mailing list
> Clo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live

-- 
Steven Shiau <steven _at_ stevenshiau org>
Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 4096R/163E3FB0
Fingerprint: EB1D D5BF 6F88 820B BCF5  356C 8E94 C9CD 163E 3FB0

Subject: Feature Request for Clonezilla

Good day from Singapore,

I notice that when Clonzilla clones harddisks, it generates many backup image files. Too many.

Is it possible for Clonezilla to generate only 1 backup image file like what Acronis True Image/Cyber Protect Home Office does?

Thank you.

Regards,

Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Targeted Individual in Singapore
Blogs:
https://tdtemcerts.blogspot.com
https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com
GIMP also stands for Government-Induced Medical Problems.

On 2024/1/24 07:19, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 23rd, 2024 at 3:13 PM, Steven Shiau <st...@na...> wrote:
>
>> What did you mean by "clone CentOS Linux Server to Synology NAS device"?
>> If you meant to save the image of your CentOS Linux to the NAS? i.e.,
>> NAS is your image repository?
>> If so, just follow
>> https://clonezilla.org//fine-print-live-doc.php?path=clonezilla-live/doc/01_Save_disk_image
>> and choose the proper service (NFS, SSH, Samba...) your NAS provides in
>> this step:
>> https://clonezilla.org//clonezilla-live/doc/01_Save_disk_image/images/ocs-07-1-img-repo.png
>>
>> Steven
>>
> Dear Steven,
>
> I have attempted cloning CentOS 7.9 Linux server to Synology NAS using Clonezilla for a major construction company in Singapore on 23 Jan 2024 Tuesday.
>
> However, "Use SSH server" wouldn't work. I keep getting connection refused.
>
> But "Use SAMBA server (Network Neighborhood server)" works. And I stick with that.
>
> Thank you.

No problem. Enjoy Clonezilla!

Steven

>
> Regards,
>
> Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
> Targeted Individual in Singapore

-- 
Steven Shiau <steven _at_ stevenshiau org>
Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 4096R/163E3FB0
Fingerprint: EB1D D5BF 6F88 820B BCF5  356C 8E94 C9CD 163E 3FB0

On Tuesday, January 23rd, 2024 at 3:13 PM, Steven Shiau <st...@na...> wrote:

> What did you mean by "clone CentOS Linux Server to Synology NAS device"?
> If you meant to save the image of your CentOS Linux to the NAS? i.e.,
> NAS is your image repository?
> If so, just follow
> https://clonezilla.org//fine-print-live-doc.php?path=clonezilla-live/doc/01_Save_disk_image
> and choose the proper service (NFS, SSH, Samba...) your NAS provides in
> this step:
> https://clonezilla.org//clonezilla-live/doc/01_Save_disk_image/images/ocs-07-1-img-repo.png
> 
> Steven
> 
Dear Steven,

I have attempted cloning CentOS 7.9 Linux server to Synology NAS using Clonezilla for a major construction company in Singapore on 23 Jan 2024 Tuesday.

However, "Use SSH server" wouldn't work. I keep getting connection refused.

But "Use SAMBA server (Network Neighborhood server)" works. And I stick with that.

Thank you.

Regards,

Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Targeted Individual in Singapore

What did you mean by "clone CentOS Linux Server to Synology NAS device"?
If you meant to save the image of your CentOS Linux to the NAS? i.e., 
NAS is your image repository?
If so, just follow
https://clonezilla.org//fine-print-live-doc.php?path=clonezilla-live/doc/01_Save_disk_image
and choose the proper service (NFS, SSH, Samba...) your NAS provides in 
this step:
https://clonezilla.org//clonezilla-live/doc/01_Save_disk_image/images/ocs-07-1-img-repo.png

Steven

On 1/22/2024 10:46 PM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming via 
Clonezilla-live wrote:
> Subject: How do I clone CentOS Linux Server to Synology NAS device using Clonezilla?
>
> Good day from Singapore,
>
> How do I clone CentOS Linux Server to Synology NAS device using Clonezilla? cPanel web hosting control panel was installed on the CentOS Linux Server.
>
> If my memory did not fail me, it was a CentOS 7.9 Linux server.
>
> I am looking for a well-written guide that won't give conflicting instructions.
>
> Please advise.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
> Targeted Individual in Singapore
> Blogs:
> https://tdtemcerts.blogspot.com
> https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com
> GIMP also stands for Government-Induced Medical Problems.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Clonezilla-live mailing list
> Clo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live

-- 
Steven Shiau <steven _at_ stevenshiau org>
Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 4096R/163E3FB0
Fingerprint: EB1D D5BF 6F88 820B BCF5  356C 8E94 C9CD 163E 3FB0