Oh cool I have a look. Depends a bit on priorities if i get around to it
Can Ifcconvert commandline output an .obj file to a stream rather than a file? I am getting large tmp files and running out of tmp space on aws lambda so thinking of a workaround
Can Ifcconvert commandline output an obj file to a stream rather than a file? getting large tmp files and running out of tmp space on aws lambda.
Will include road and rail alignments and geology strata. Very exciting http://ifc43-docs.standards.buildingsmart.org/
That seems to work great for us
That seems to work great for us
Actually we might just use --model-offset by the coordinate system to write out glbs initially and add it back later. Seems to work with obj for me only not glb but we can probably handle that.
Actually we might just use --model-offset by the coordinate system to write out glbs initially and add it back later. Is model offset scene units or meters generally? And in ifc coordinate system?
Actually we might just use --model-offset by the coordinate system to write out glbs initially and add it back later. Is model offset scene units or meters generally?
Actually we might just use --model-offset by the coordinate system to write out gltfs initalljy and add it back later.
Just saw https://sourceforge.net/p/ifcopenshell/discussion/1782717/thread/fcdc7610/ since this from 2013 is that still good advice? We noticed it seems to happen more fro files where IFCSite is missing, identity or small
Just saw https://sourceforge.net/p/ifcopenshell/discussion/1782717/thread/fcdc7610/ since this from 2013 is that still good advice? We noticed it seems to happen more fro files where IFCSite is missing, identity or small
Just saw https://sourceforge.net/p/ifcopenshell/discussion/1782717/thread/fcdc7610/ since this from 2013 is that still good advice? We noticed it seems to happen more fro files where IFCSite is identity or small
Just saw https://sourceforge.net/p/ifcopenshell/discussion/1782717/thread/fcdc7610/ since this from 2013 is that still good advice?
Since that is quite old advice is that still valid?
Would you be able to make a merge request? Running into similar things
Just saw https://sourceforge.net/p/ifcopenshell/discussion/1782717/thread/fcdc7610/ is that still good advice?
node at this point but i give it a try, thanks again. We have confirmed the ifc model looks fine in CAD its just in a quite large coordinate system. I was hoping --precision helps that but i probably have to go local placement.I seem to have cases were both doesnt help --building-local-placement --precision=32
node at this point but i give it a try, thanks again. We have confirmed the ifc model looks fine in CAD its just in a quite large coordinate system. I was hoping --precision helps that but i probably have to go local placement.I seem to have cases were both doesnt help --building-local-placement --precision=32
node at this point but i give it a try, thanks again. We have confirmed the ifc model looks fine in CAD its just in a quite large coordinate system. I was hoping --precision helps that but i probably have to go local placement
node at this point but i give it a try, thanks again. We have confirmed the ifc model looks fine in CAD its just in a quite large coordinate system
node at this point but i give it a try, thanks again
And indeed --building-local-placement makes it look perfect. Any way to apply that transform back after so i have a nicely tessellated model in the correct coordinate system?
I dont know its related but high chance that your second point is right: Our users data is in usually large geospatial coordinate systems. If i use -site-local-placement or --building-local-placement the coordinate system changes? I try for testing at least.
i am running (only on this model) into some artefacts, anyone has seen similar? Ideas to avoid them? Thanks a lot
Thanks for the quick reply. I did not even see --deflection-tolernce flag. Maybe i need to update my commandline. I have my cad person check the file again.
hi, I have an ifc pipe model and convert it to glb. The tessellation is too low but I cannot see angular-tolerance values affecting the resulting file size. I would have expected a lower value to create more triangles and better results. Am I missing anything? I saw a discussion about deflection_tolerance is that better/possible to use? https://sourceforge.net/p/ifcopenshell/discussion/1782717/thread/84a6d7d6/ Would love to use this to for lods... ifconvert --angular-tolerance seems to not affect...
hi, I have an ifc pipe model and convert it to glb. The tessellation is too low but I cannot see angular-tolerance values affecting the resulting file size. I would have expected a lower value to create more triangles and better results. Am I missing anything? I saw a discussion about deflection_tolerance is that betetr to use? ifconvert --angular-tolerance seems to not affect resulting file size
hi, I have an ifc pipe model and convert it to glb. The tessellation is too low but I cannot see angular-tolerance values affecting the resulting file size. I would have expected a lower value to create more triangles and better results. Am I missing anything? ifconvert --angular-tolerance seems to not affect resulting file size
Thanks for the quick reply. I was checking for known issues, i post more details when i have a closer look. Its customer provided data so might be all kinds. I fixed the index format in my import, i am frankly surprised by that choice as well. Lets see what i can find
hi, I seem to get strange polygon indices when using ifcconvert (tried obj and glb and ifc2/3/4). Our models are in a large coordinate system but shouldnt matter? Is that know in any way? Any workaeound? Slight related uint as index format is deprecated in glb and opengl. Thanks for your help
Thanks for the reply. Is there a roadmap somewhere.? Also getting some bad looking polygons but i guess that needs more investigation
Thanks for the reply. Is there a roadmap somewhere.? Also getting some bad looking polygons but i guess that needs more investigation
Thanks for the reply. Is there a roadmap somewhere. Also getting some bad looking polygonsbut i guess that needs more ivnestigation
Is removing supposed to work in the latest version?
and removing shapes with ifc_file.remove(shape) gives me a swift error in python when saving the fie, seems unsafe https://sourceforge.net/p/ifcopenshell/discussion/1782717/thread/d5768a867a/
and removing shapes with ifc_file.remove(shape) gives me a swift error in python when saving the fie, seems unsafe
Sorry for multi post, the python api is way more fun than comandline but cannot convert files. I didnt get the filtering working in command line properly and the docs dont match whats happening apparently. Are there more advanced filtering examples somewhere?
Love to see that + convert export to obj etc?
Love to see that + export to onj etc?
Love to see that
Love to see that
Love to see that