Activity for aszfaf

  • aszfaf aszfaf posted a comment on discussion Development

    Oh cool I have a look. Depends a bit on priorities if i get around to it

  • aszfaf aszfaf modified a comment on discussion Development

    Can Ifcconvert commandline output an .obj file to a stream rather than a file? I am getting large tmp files and running out of tmp space on aws lambda so thinking of a workaround

  • aszfaf aszfaf posted a comment on discussion Development

    Can Ifcconvert commandline output an obj file to a stream rather than a file? getting large tmp files and running out of tmp space on aws lambda.

  • aszfaf aszfaf posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    Will include road and rail alignments and geology strata. Very exciting http://ifc43-docs.standards.buildingsmart.org/

  • aszfaf aszfaf modified a comment on discussion Open Discussion

  • aszfaf aszfaf posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    That seems to work great for us

  • aszfaf aszfaf posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    That seems to work great for us

  • aszfaf aszfaf modified a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    Actually we might just use --model-offset by the coordinate system to write out glbs initially and add it back later. Seems to work with obj for me only not glb but we can probably handle that.

  • aszfaf aszfaf modified a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    Actually we might just use --model-offset by the coordinate system to write out glbs initially and add it back later. Is model offset scene units or meters generally? And in ifc coordinate system?

  • aszfaf aszfaf modified a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    Actually we might just use --model-offset by the coordinate system to write out glbs initially and add it back later. Is model offset scene units or meters generally?

  • aszfaf aszfaf posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    Actually we might just use --model-offset by the coordinate system to write out gltfs initalljy and add it back later.

  • aszfaf aszfaf modified a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    Just saw https://sourceforge.net/p/ifcopenshell/discussion/1782717/thread/fcdc7610/ since this from 2013 is that still good advice? We noticed it seems to happen more fro files where IFCSite is missing, identity or small

  • aszfaf aszfaf modified a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    Just saw https://sourceforge.net/p/ifcopenshell/discussion/1782717/thread/fcdc7610/ since this from 2013 is that still good advice? We noticed it seems to happen more fro files where IFCSite is missing, identity or small

  • aszfaf aszfaf modified a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    Just saw https://sourceforge.net/p/ifcopenshell/discussion/1782717/thread/fcdc7610/ since this from 2013 is that still good advice? We noticed it seems to happen more fro files where IFCSite is identity or small

  • aszfaf aszfaf modified a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    Just saw https://sourceforge.net/p/ifcopenshell/discussion/1782717/thread/fcdc7610/ since this from 2013 is that still good advice?

  • aszfaf aszfaf modified a comment on discussion Help

    Since that is quite old advice is that still valid?

  • aszfaf aszfaf posted a comment on discussion Help

    Would you be able to make a merge request? Running into similar things

  • aszfaf aszfaf posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    Just saw https://sourceforge.net/p/ifcopenshell/discussion/1782717/thread/fcdc7610/ is that still good advice?

  • aszfaf aszfaf modified a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    node at this point but i give it a try, thanks again. We have confirmed the ifc model looks fine in CAD its just in a quite large coordinate system. I was hoping --precision helps that but i probably have to go local placement.I seem to have cases were both doesnt help --building-local-placement --precision=32

  • aszfaf aszfaf modified a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    node at this point but i give it a try, thanks again. We have confirmed the ifc model looks fine in CAD its just in a quite large coordinate system. I was hoping --precision helps that but i probably have to go local placement.I seem to have cases were both doesnt help --building-local-placement --precision=32

  • aszfaf aszfaf modified a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    node at this point but i give it a try, thanks again. We have confirmed the ifc model looks fine in CAD its just in a quite large coordinate system. I was hoping --precision helps that but i probably have to go local placement

  • aszfaf aszfaf modified a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    node at this point but i give it a try, thanks again. We have confirmed the ifc model looks fine in CAD its just in a quite large coordinate system

  • aszfaf aszfaf posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    node at this point but i give it a try, thanks again

  • aszfaf aszfaf posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    And indeed --building-local-placement makes it look perfect. Any way to apply that transform back after so i have a nicely tessellated model in the correct coordinate system?

  • aszfaf aszfaf posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    I dont know its related but high chance that your second point is right: Our users data is in usually large geospatial coordinate systems. If i use -site-local-placement or --building-local-placement the coordinate system changes? I try for testing at least.

  • aszfaf aszfaf posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    i am running (only on this model) into some artefacts, anyone has seen similar? Ideas to avoid them? Thanks a lot

  • aszfaf aszfaf posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    Thanks for the quick reply. I did not even see --deflection-tolernce flag. Maybe i need to update my commandline. I have my cad person check the file again.

  • aszfaf aszfaf modified a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    hi, I have an ifc pipe model and convert it to glb. The tessellation is too low but I cannot see angular-tolerance values affecting the resulting file size. I would have expected a lower value to create more triangles and better results. Am I missing anything? I saw a discussion about deflection_tolerance is that better/possible to use? https://sourceforge.net/p/ifcopenshell/discussion/1782717/thread/84a6d7d6/ Would love to use this to for lods... ifconvert --angular-tolerance seems to not affect...

  • aszfaf aszfaf modified a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    hi, I have an ifc pipe model and convert it to glb. The tessellation is too low but I cannot see angular-tolerance values affecting the resulting file size. I would have expected a lower value to create more triangles and better results. Am I missing anything? I saw a discussion about deflection_tolerance is that betetr to use? ifconvert --angular-tolerance seems to not affect resulting file size

  • aszfaf aszfaf posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    hi, I have an ifc pipe model and convert it to glb. The tessellation is too low but I cannot see angular-tolerance values affecting the resulting file size. I would have expected a lower value to create more triangles and better results. Am I missing anything? ifconvert --angular-tolerance seems to not affect resulting file size

  • aszfaf aszfaf posted a comment on discussion Help

    Thanks for the quick reply. I was checking for known issues, i post more details when i have a closer look. Its customer provided data so might be all kinds. I fixed the index format in my import, i am frankly surprised by that choice as well. Lets see what i can find

  • aszfaf aszfaf posted a comment on discussion Help

    hi, I seem to get strange polygon indices when using ifcconvert (tried obj and glb and ifc2/3/4). Our models are in a large coordinate system but shouldnt matter? Is that know in any way? Any workaeound? Slight related uint as index format is deprecated in glb and opengl. Thanks for your help

  • aszfaf aszfaf modified a comment on discussion Help

    Thanks for the reply. Is there a roadmap somewhere.? Also getting some bad looking polygons but i guess that needs more investigation

  • aszfaf aszfaf modified a comment on discussion Help

    Thanks for the reply. Is there a roadmap somewhere.? Also getting some bad looking polygons but i guess that needs more investigation

  • aszfaf aszfaf posted a comment on discussion Help

    Thanks for the reply. Is there a roadmap somewhere. Also getting some bad looking polygonsbut i guess that needs more ivnestigation

  • aszfaf aszfaf posted a comment on discussion Help

    Is removing supposed to work in the latest version?

  • aszfaf aszfaf modified a comment on discussion Help

    and removing shapes with ifc_file.remove(shape) gives me a swift error in python when saving the fie, seems unsafe https://sourceforge.net/p/ifcopenshell/discussion/1782717/thread/d5768a867a/

  • aszfaf aszfaf posted a comment on discussion Help

    and removing shapes with ifc_file.remove(shape) gives me a swift error in python when saving the fie, seems unsafe

  • aszfaf aszfaf posted a comment on discussion Help

    Sorry for multi post, the python api is way more fun than comandline but cannot convert files. I didnt get the filtering working in command line properly and the docs dont match whats happening apparently. Are there more advanced filtering examples somewhere?

  • aszfaf aszfaf modified a comment on discussion Help

    Love to see that + convert export to obj etc?

  • aszfaf aszfaf modified a comment on discussion Help

    Love to see that + export to onj etc?

  • aszfaf aszfaf posted a comment on discussion Help

    Love to see that

  • aszfaf aszfaf posted a comment on discussion Help

    Love to see that

  • aszfaf aszfaf posted a comment on discussion Help

    Love to see that

1