User Activity

  • Posted a comment on discussion Expert questions on The Netwide Assembler

    no problem, i come back checking updates just now. no delay to me, thanks for help,

  • Posted a comment on discussion Expert questions on The Netwide Assembler

    i'm using nasm 2.11.08

  • Posted a comment on discussion Expert questions on The Netwide Assembler

    also, i'd appreciate if you can activate my account (wild.pie) on nasm.us, in case i have other questions. thank you,

  • Posted a comment on discussion Expert questions on The Netwide Assembler

    well, i have existing code to manipulate 64-bit seg descriptors, but i don't have 32-bit protected mode code. the problem is cpu enforces flat memory in long mode. don't want to spend too much time on this, so i posted on stackoverflow and here's a response agreeing with my suspects: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49721801/does-ebp2-reference-ds-or-ss-segment does this make sense? if i'm wrong, can you tell me why [ebp*2] is the same as [ebp+ebp}? thanks,

  • Posted a comment on discussion Expert questions on The Netwide Assembler

    but why [ebp+edx] and [edx+ebp] are different? it takes some time to test this in a 32-bit or 64-bit mode, but doable. is there an easier way to verify this?

  • Posted a comment on discussion Expert questions on The Netwide Assembler

    is this forum abandoned? tried to sign up on nasm.us forum, but cannot receive activation email. i had no problem signup here with same email. also, nasm generates [ebp, eiz] for [eiz, ebp] (optimization for shorter machine code, which i think is incorrect), but it generates different codes for [ebp, edx] and [edx, ebp], which is correct.

  • Modified a comment on discussion Expert questions on The Netwide Assembler

    nasm generates optimized code for [eax*2]. it generates the code as [eax + eax] instead. i just noticed it also replaces [ebp*2] with [ebp + ebp]. in [ebp*2], ebp is the index register, not base register. so this form references DS segment. in [ebp + ebp], ebp is used as base register, so it references SS segment. is this a nasm bug or i missed something? IDM vol 1 page 3-21 "Table 3-5 Default Segment Selection Rules", memory reference uses SS by default if EBP is used as base register Any memory...

  • Modified a comment on discussion Expert questions on The Netwide Assembler

    nasm generates optimized code for [eax*2]. it generates the code as [eax + eax] instead. i just noticed it also replaces [ebp*2] with [ebp + ebp]. in [ebp*2], ebp is the index register, not base register. so this form references DS segment. in [ebp + ebp], ebp is used as base register, so it references SS segment. is this a nasm bug or i missed something? IDM vol 1 page 3-21 "Table 3-5 Default Segment Selection Rules", memory reference uses SS by default if EBP is used as base register Any memory...

View All

Personal Data

Username:
wildpie
Joined:
2018-04-06 06:20:07

Projects

  • No projects to display.

Personal Tools

MongoDB Logo MongoDB