I see. Should I create a new feature request for custom labels then? Although I'm not sure what exactly I need. My primary focus would be to not lose information. I don't care that much whether custom labels are shown in Outlook (I don't know if that would even be possible) as long as they are still present in iOS and on the CardDAV Server. I had a quick look at the sources but my main language is Java and I know too few about the general implementation of the synchronizer, so please bear with me...
I see. Should I create a new feature request for custom labels then? Although I'm not sure what exactly I need. My primary focus would be to not lose information. I don't care that much whether custom labels are shown in Outlook (I don't even know if that would be possible) as long as they are still present in iOS and on the CardDAV Server. I had a quick look at the sources but my main language is Java and I know too few about the general implementation of the synchronizer, so please bear with me...
I see. Should I create a new feature request for custom labels then? Although I'm not sure what exactly I need. My primary focus would be to not lose information. I don't care that much whether custom labels are shown in Outlook as long as they are still present in iOS and on the CardDAV Server. I had a quick look at the sources but my main language is Java and I know too few about the general implementation of the synchronizer, so please bear with me if I'm confusing things. I've seen two issues...
Sorry, didn't know - I assumed they'd both use somewhat "standard" X-prefixed properties. I don't have Google involved in my setup, I'm syncing iOS <--> NAS <--> Outlook. Edit: NAS is Synology CardDAV Server, if that matters, and I can confirm that the iOS labels are still there after sync. Snippet from the vcf export: BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:3.0 ... item1.EMAIL;type=INTERNET;type=pref:foo@bar.de item2.EMAIL;type=INTERNET:foobar@example.com ... item2.X-ABLabel:(outdated) END:VCARD
Sorry, didn't know - I assumed they'd both use standard X-prefixed properties. I don't have Google involved in my setup, I'm syncing iOS <--> NAS <--> Outlook. Edit: NAS is Synology CardDAV Server, if that matters, and I can confirm that the iOS labels are still there after sync. Snippet from the vcf export: BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:3.0 ... item1.EMAIL;type=INTERNET;type=pref:foo@bar.de item2.EMAIL;type=INTERNET:foobar@example.com ... item2.X-ABLabel:(outdated) END:VCARD
Sorry, didn't know - I assumed they'd both use standard X-prefixed properties. I don't have Google involved in my setup, I'm syncing iOS <--> NAS <--> Outlook. Edit: NAS is Synology CardDAV Server, if that matters, and I can confirm that the iOS labels are still there after sync. Snippet from the vcf export: item1.EMAIL;type=INTERNET;type=pref:foo@bar.de item2.EMAIL;type=INTERNET:foobar@example.com item2.X-ABLabel:(outdated)
Sorry, didn't know - I assumed they'd both use standard X-prefixed properties. I don't have Google involved in my setup, I'm syncing iOS <--> NAS <--> Outlook.
+1 here. I am synchronizing with an iOS device using custom labels. Those labels get lost after I save the contact in Outlook. I am mainly blaming Outlook, but maybe there is a chance to implement a workaround to at least keep those labels for other clients. Can we do anything to support the implementation of such a feature?