Paul Russell

Yeah - I'd love to see this too. On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 at 14:53, J Theisen jtsf11@users.sourceforge.net wrote: We updated ProGuard 6.0.3 to support the Java 11 major number. ProGuard compiles and works correctly without reporting an unsupported compilation. However, when we compile our code with Java 11 (openjdk) we get thousands of can't find referenced [field|method] errors. When we compille with OpenJDK Java 10, running our new version of ProGuard, we have no errors. I suspect this is due to the...

Launch4J will not produce an executable such as you are referring to. Instead, you will get an archive that could be unzipped. If you have the money, you can easily use ExcelsiorJet of similar to produce a real .EXE with runtime. Your product will fire up faster. But then you will lose the power that the JVM has to do certain ahead of time optimisations. I like ExcelsiorJet, and there are others, but they are too pricey for most small development companies. On 19 May 2018 at 11:37, Jens Eckervogt...

Launch4J will not produce an executable such as you are referring to. Instead, you will get an archive that could be unzipped. Obsfucation will help disguise your code, it's true. If you have the money, you can easily use ExcelsiorJet of similar to produce a real .EXE with runtime. Your product will fire up faster. But then you will lose the power that the JVM has to do certain ahead of time optimisations. I like ExcelsiorJet, and there are others, but they are too pricey for most small development...

Launch4J will not produce an executable such as you are referring to. Instead, you will get an archive that could be unzipped. If you have the money, you can easily use ExcelsiorJet or similar to produce a real .EXE with a bundled runtime. Your product will fire up faster. But then you will lose the power that the JVM has to do certain ahead of time optimisations. I like ExcelsiorJet, and there are others like JWrapper, but they are too pricey for most small development companies.

+1 for this please

+1 for this please, too. Trying to use with Maven Plugin and java9

+1 for this please, too