Unable to Change Usermin Theme
One of the primary reason's I am attracted to Webmin and Virtualmin is for it's built-in backup tools. They are simple, configurable, have a nice UI, and they work well. Sometimes however it makes little sense to install Webmin just for the backup feature. So... why not make a new separate project, called (of course) "Backupmin"? The project's primary focus would be backup administration. For an MVP, just copy the backup functions from Webmin and put them into Backupmin as is. Future goals can include...
I find Webmin's "Filesystem Backup" module very powerful. I know it is currently possible to use it with ZFS as source directory. Webmin doesn't care what the underlying filesystem is. While that works fine, it's not taking advantage of ZFS snapshot and send/receive features. This is a feature request to add in the ability to schedule a snapshot of an entire pool or specific dataset (zfs snapshot -r Pool/Dataset@snapshotname). We should be able to specify a retention period for a snapshot (that Webmin...
I find Webmin's "Filesystem Backup" module very powerful. I know it is currently possible to use it with ZFS as source directory. Webmin doesn't care what the underlying filesystem is. While that works fine, it's not taking advantage of ZFS snapshot and send/receive features. This is a feature request to add in the ability to schedule a snapshot of an entire pool or specific dataset (zfs snapshot -r Pool/Dataset@snapshotname). We should be able to specify a retention period for a snapshot (that Webmin...
One of the primary reason's I am attracted to Webmin and Virtual is for it's built-in backup tools. They are simple, configurable, have a nice UI, and they work well. Sometimes however it makes little sense to install Webmin just for the backup feature. So... why not make a new separate project, called (of course) "Backupmin"? The project's primary focus would be backup administration. For an MVP, just copy the backup functions from Webmin and put them into Backupmin as is. Future goals can include...
[Feature Request] Add ZFS to Filesystem Backup Module
Not sure if this is directly controlable by usbip, but on a high latency connection (150ms - 200ms), I'm getting this error in the system log: kernel: [ 7097.619801] vhci_hcd: unlink->seqnum 207 kernel: [ 7097.619803] vhci_hcd: the urb (seqnum 207) was already given back kernel: [ 7097.719867] vhci_hcd: dequeue a urb ffff8896396b33c0 kernel: [ 7097.719869] vhci_hcd: device ffff88963a0ca2d0 seems to be still connected pcscd[1290]: 00542159 ccid_usb.c:836:ReadUSB() read failed (1/8): -7 LIBUSB_ERROR_TIMEOUT...
DHCP option boot-filename is invalid
Tested with 2.11.1b156 for about 7 days. So far looks okay, not seeing the memory usage rise past 3% (2GB RAM total)
Tested with 2.11.1b156 for about 7 days. So far looks okay, not seeing the memory udage rise past 3% (2GB RAM total)
Possible memory leak in snmpd
After a bunch of trial and error runs I was able to figure out what was wrong with your origional rules. It looks like PPTP doesn't seem to like it when you proxy the tcp handshake as directed by the synproxy state keyword in the second rule. https://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/filter.html#synproxy. It also seems unnecessary to manually put in flags S/SA since that gets added automatically. The working rules end up being pass in quick on $wanif $inetfamily proto gre from any to $pptpdtarget keep state...
I agree having TCP port number 47 does seem like it's unnecessary. I'll test it without that rule while keeping the UDP version (which I belive is required for PPTP to work). Clientwise I've tried it on Andriod and Windows.
The PPTP server is the t1n1wall. . My OP is perhaps a bit confusing, I copy/pasted from a test VM using internal addressing and I can't seem to figure out how to edit OP's here on SF. The actual change is in my latest patch. # PPTP rules pass in quick on $wanif $inetfamily proto { tcp udp } from any to $pptpdtarget port { 47 1723 } I don't claim I actually know what I am doing in regards to pf rules. The above just happened to work for me when I used it. :-)
Here's a corrected patch without the extra rule.
FYI, the origional rules on the top are not commented. Also replace 192.168.132.128 with the WAN IP. Also, the second line for ports 5005 and 5006 are probably not needed.
FYI, the origional rules on the top are not commented. Also replace 192.168.132.128 with the WAN IP.
FYI, the origional rules on the top are not commented.
PPTP VPN not accepting connections
I haven't run into any problems on the test VM I've tried this on. I don't belive this would have any affect the traffic graphs since this doesn't touch those areas.
Update crunched hostapd to work with latest security update
Field for Gatway in DHCP Server
If you do decide to port (which I hope you do) I can help out with the packaging and service scripts. I really look foward to using both the client and server version on FreeBSD, but I'd be happy for now just having the client.
GROUP BY clause and contains nonaggregated column
Upgrade Instructions Corrections