Looks really nice, I like it.
This feature would be really appriciated!
Thanks Alois for your reply. I partly agree with you regarding point 1; I don't think...
I responded mainly to Alois's point of view that they are very hard to distinguish...
I agree; only those elements which can be used in an editor should be represented...
It was just a potential suggestion since an IEC 61499 system could have one or more...
I think both options - the integrated palette and the new system explorer - are really...
Regarding the FB icons which look quite similar as already pointed out, maybe a letter...
Regarding the FB icons which look quite similar as already pointed out, maybe a letter...
Looks fine to me. Maybe one additional suggestion would be (needs to be discussed)...
Looks fine to me
I can understand most of the point and these are important points (but not point...
I partially agree with this point of view. The problem with the palette is that it...
As already expressed I find it more practical to integrate the type library for all...
I am fine with the proposed changes. As Martin said it could be re-implemented later...
Problems with FB Interface Editor - Naming of Data In- and Outputs
It also happens in the RC1.
4DIAC Help not included in 4DIAC-IDE 1.6.0 RC2
4DIAC-IDE 1.6.0_RC2 zip-packages cannot be downloaded
I would be in favour to move it to the advanced section!
The combo-box is a very good idea. Yes, also the FORTE_TRACE_EVENTS shoule be deactivated...
I also find it very useful to move the above mentioned options into the advanced...
In my point of view it should be moved also to the advanced section. It is what I...
In my point of view it should be moved to the advanced section. It is what I would...
In my point of view yes. It is what I would expect as user of 4DIAC. Moreove, in...
I fully agree. Currently, the type editor is overloaded - especially the interface...
I like the last version.
Looks very good. In my point of view there are two possibilities. At first, the blue...
Hi, Such a feature would be great and would increase the usability. Some protocolls...
The type navigator is a very useful item in 4DIAC-IDE but if you have several system...
Symbol 5 is also fine for me but take into account that also the "traditional" interface...
In my point of view the first symbol would fit best.
I understand, but the provided symbols didn't solve the issue regarding bi-directional...
For sure, but I am not quite sure if it would be well understood in ASCII format...
Yes, the first symbol looks fine too me but I am not quite sure if it needs to be...