Activity for Tom
-
Tom modified a comment on discussion Developers
Hi all, Does anybody having an implementation of awstats on IIS webserver behind a proxy running? We receive the real user IP in X-Forwarded-For and not c-ip - field. #Fields: date time s-sitename s-computername s-ip cs-method cs-uri-stem cs-uri-query s-port cs-username c-ip cs-version cs(User-Agent) cs(Cookie) cs(Referer) cs-host sc-status sc-substatus sc-win32-status sc-bytes cs-bytes time-taken X-Forwarded-For 2022-05-25 00:05:43 W3SVC2 www 10.0.1.30 HEAD / - 443 - 10.0.1.10 HTTP/1.0 Mozilla/5.0+(Windows+NT+10.0;+Win64;+x64;+rv:66.0)+Gecko/20100101+Firefox/66.0...
-
I was not able to use a custom logformat, because the IIS logs do have somewhere in the middle some commented out lines. AWStats did not find any valid log lines that match your LogFormat parameter, in the 50th first non commented lines read of your log. Your log file type C:\Windows\System32\LogFiles\W3SVC2\*.log | must have a bad format or LogFormat parameter setup does not match this format. Your AWStats LogFormat parameter is: %time2 %other %other %other %method %url %query %other %other %other...
-
Hi all, I wrote a small tool on .NET 4.5.2 to replace the value of cs-ip with the value of x-forwarded-for within the IIS logfiles. The x-forwarded-for column will be removed completetly at the end. After the processing i have IIS logs as if there is no reverse proxy in front of IIS. awstat can then process the logs without any problems. It works good for me. Questions? Just hit me up. Best regards, Tom
-
Hi all, I wrote a small tool on .NET 4.5.2 to replace the value of cs-ip with the value of x-forwarded-for within the IIS logfiles. The x-forwarded-for column will be removed completetly at the end. After the processing i have IIS logs as if there is no reverse proxy in front of IIS. awstat can then process the logs without any problems. It works good for me. Questions? Just hit me up. Best regards, Tom
-
Hi all, I wrote a small tool on .NET 4.5.2 to replace the value of cs-ip with the value of x-forwarded-for within the IIS logfiles. The x-forwarded-for column will be removed completetly at the end. After the processing i have IIS logs as if there is no reverse proxy in front of IIS. awstat can then process the logs without any problems. It works good for me. Questions? Just hit me up. Best regards, Tom
-
I was not able to use a custom logformat, because the IIS logs do have somewhere in the middle some commented out lines. AWStats did not find any valid log lines that match your LogFormat parameter, in the 50th first non commented lines read of your log. Your log file type C:\Windows\System32\LogFiles\W3SVC2\*.log | must have a bad format or LogFormat parameter setup does not match this format. Your AWStats LogFormat parameter is: %time2 %other %other %other %method %url %query %other %other %other...
-
Hi all, Does anybody having an implementation of awstats on IIS webserver behind a proxy running? We receive the real user IP in X-Forwarded-For and not cs-ip - field. #Fields: date time s-sitename s-computername s-ip cs-method cs-uri-stem cs-uri-query s-port cs-username c-ip cs-version cs(User-Agent) cs(Cookie) cs(Referer) cs-host sc-status sc-substatus sc-win32-status sc-bytes cs-bytes time-taken X-Forwarded-For 2022-05-25 00:05:43 W3SVC2 www 10.0.1.30 HEAD / - 443 - 10.0.1.10 HTTP/1.0 Mozilla/5.0+(Windows+NT+10.0;+Win64;+x64;+rv:66.0)+Gecko/20100101+Firefox/66.0...
-
/ipfilter parameter
-
Hi Grzesiek Version 1.0.1.2 was just released. Here you get the possibility to work with ip-filters. Best regards Tom
-
Update: After i've added the domain manually to /etc/named.conf, the zone was present in the webmin gui at "Bind DNS Server" but i was not able to initalize a test-transfer from the master zone. There was an error message: /bin/dig: convert textname to IDN encoding: failure After i've executed the retransfer manually, the zone was in sync. rndc retransfer hürlimann-treuhand.ch Best regards Tom
-
Problems with internationalized domain names
-
If /directory is not specified in combination with /adduser, then "Missing arguments" is returned
-
/comments parameter required
-
If /directory is not specified in combination with /adduser, then "Missing arguments" is returned
-
/comments parameter required
-
Improvement
-
BUG
-
Improvement
-
Improvement
-
BUG
-
Hi JH Thank you for your feedback. In the version 1.0.1.1 the /directory option is not a required parameter anymore if /adduser is used, the new version was released just a few minutes ago. Let me know if it works as expected. Best regards Tom
-
Hi JH Thank you for your feedback. The /comment option has been added in version 1.0.1.1, the new version was released just a few minutes ago. Let me know if it works as expected. Best regards Tom
-
Hi Steven My bad - sorry, the menu is there. Forget about it. Have a good weekend Tom
-
Hi Steven It works on my side - thank you for the quick fix. Something i have observerd: In the past, i found a default menu came up, i was able to replace the background image and adjusted the menu items based on the original template. In the menu i had something like different resoutions, memtest+ and booting the original image. Today i see, there is no menu anymore. There is just a short message saying "found restrore jobs in $somewhere" and then the restore starts. Would it be possible to restore...
-
Hi Steven It works on my side - thank you for the quick fix. Something i have observerd: In the past, i found a default menu came up, i was able to replace the background image and adjusted the menu items based on the original template. In the menu i had something like different resoutions, memtest+ and booting the original image. Today i see, there is no menu anymore. There is just a short message saying "found restrore jobes in $somewhere" and then the restore starts. Would it be possible to restore...
-
Mode: Expert mode Mode: recovery-iso-zip Choose: some-image-file.img Device: sda Parameter: -e2 -icds -j2 Parameter: ‘use partition table from the image’ Parameter: Yes, check the image before restoring. Parameter: -p poweroff Parameter: en_US English Parameter: NONE Parameter: both Verify: Make sure everything matches to the selection above. Power off
-
Mode: Expert mode Mode: recovery-iso-zip Choose: some-image-file.img Device: sda Parameter: -e2 -icds -j2 Parameter: -k1, new ‘use partition table from the image’ Parameter: Yes, check the image before restoring. Parameter: -p poweroff Parameter: en_US English Parameter: NONE Parameter: both Verify: Make sure everything matches to the selection above. Power off
-
Just tried with clonezilla-live-20200602-focal-amd64 - problem still present.
-
I have the same problem with clonezilla-live-20200428-focal-amd64, the last time i used it was with clonezilla-live-20180812-bionic-amd64 and there it was working. Maybe it has something to do with lgegacy/UEFI boot if the problem comes up or not? This is what i get after an recovery ZIP was extracted to an USB flash drive and then when try to boot from that USB drive.
-
I have the same problem with clonezilla-live-20200428-focal-amd64, the last time i used it was with clonezilla-live-20180812-bionic-amd64 and there it was working. This is what i get after an recovery ZIP was extracted to an USB flash drive and then when try to boot from that USB drive.
-
I have the same problem with clonezilla-live-20200428-focal-amd64 This is what i get after an recovery ZIP was extracted to an USB flash drive and then when try to boot from that USB drive.
-
I confirm, works as expected: Result: Testing transfer of slave zone from 10.0.1.30 .. .. from 10.0.1.30 : Completed OK Test transfer successfully fetched 10 records from at least one nameserver. Actual transfers by BIND should also succeed.
-
I like - thank you(!)
-
Have a look here https://sourceforge.net/p/webadmin/bugs/5277/ It seems there is a solution available soon.
-
Have a look here https://sourceforge.net/p/webadmin/bugs/5277/ It seems there is a solution soon available.
-
Bind 9.9: Testing transfer of slave zone from .. .. from : Failed : /bin/dig: couldn't get address for '': not found
-
Hi all, Since recently: CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 BIND 9.9.4-RedHat-9.9.4-73.el7_6 (Extended Support Version) At 'Servers' -> 'BIND DNS Server' -> 'Create Slave Zone' Zone type: Forward Domain name / Network: example.com Records File: Automatic Master Servers: 10.0.1.32 Server port: Default Select the newly created DNS zone. Click on 'Test Zone Transfer' Error appears: Testing transfer of slave zone from .. .. from : Failed : /bin/dig: couldn't get address for '': not found Any ideas? Regards...
-
HI all, Since recently: OS: CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 At 'Servers' -> 'BIND DNS Server' -> 'Create Slave Zone' Zone type: Forward Domain name / Network: example.com Records File: Automatic Master Servers: 10.0.1.32 Server port: Default Select the newly created DNS zone. Click on 'Test Zone Transfer' Error appears: Testing transfer of slave zone from .. .. from : Failed : /bin/dig: couldn't get address for '': not found Any ideas? Regards Tom
-
HI all, Since recently: At 'Servers' -> 'BIND DNS Server' -> 'Create Slave Zone' Zone type: Forward Domain name / Network: example.com Records File: Automatic Master Servers: 10.0.1.32 Server port: Default Select the newly created DNS zone. Click on 'Test Zone Transfer' Error appears: Testing transfer of slave zone from .. .. from : Failed : /bin/dig: couldn't get address for '': not found Any ideas? Regards Tom
-
Hi Christophe I would suggest, that you redirect users to a single URL from within emails. For the website itself: Files should always be linked relative to the root-directory and not statically by using the IP-Address/Hostname of the webserver. Test: a) Open this page: http://$ipaddress/teemip/pages/UI.php b) View the page source and you can see a lot of files are not linked relative to the webroot. Good: <link href="../css/jquery.treeview.css?itopversion=2.2.0" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet">...
-
Hi Christophe Thank you for your feedback. There is a scenario, that teemip has to work, even if we do not connect to the host by using the real IP address/hostname of the server, because we have different IP's that are used to access the website of teemip. We can not use a reverse proxy as you suggested :-( That would be possible if the links to CSS/JS files are coded relative to the web-root (if there are no other limitations caused by static linking). I attached a small image to understand the...
-
Hi Christophe Thank you for your feedback. There is a scenario, that teemip has to work, even if we do not connect to the host by using the real IP address/hostname of the server, because we have different IP's that are used to access the website of teemip. We can not use a reverse proxy as you suggested :-( That would be possible if the links to CSS/JS files are coded relative to the web-root (if there are no other limitations caused by static linking). I attached a small image to understand the...
-
Hi Christophe Thank you for your feedback. There is a scenario, that teemip has to work, even if we do not connect to the host by using the real IP address/hostname of the server, because we have different IP's that are used to access the website of teemip. We can not use a reverse proxy as you suggested :-( That would be possible if the links to CSS/JS files are coded relative to the web-root. I attached a small image to understand the siutaion a little bit better. Best regards - Tom
-
Hi Christophe Thank you for your feedback. There is a scenario, that teemip has to work, even if we do not connect to the host by using the real IP address/hostname of the server. We can not use a reverse proxy as you suggested :-( That would be possible if the links to CSS/JS files are coded relative to the web-root. I attached a small image to understand the siutaion a little bit better. Best regards - Tom
-
Hi Christophe Thank you for your feedback. There is a scenario, that teemip has to work, even if we do not connect to the host by using the real IP address/hostname of the server. We can not use a reverse proxy as you suggested :-( That would be possible if the links to CSS/JS files are coded relative to the web-root. I attached a small image to understand the siutaion a little bit better. Best regards - Tom
-
Hi Christophe Thank you for your feedback. There is a scenario, that teemip has to work, even if we do not connect to the host by using the real IP address/hostname of the server. We can not use a reverse proxy as you suggested :-( That would be possible if the links to CSS/JS files are coded relative to the web-root. I attached a small image to understand the siutaion a little bit better. Best regards - Tom
-
Hi Christophe Thank you for your feedback. There is a scenario, that teemip has to work, even if we do not connect to the host by using the real IP address/hostname of the server. We can not use a reverse proxy as you suggested :-( That would be possible if the links to CSS/JS files are coded relative to the web-root. I attached a small image to understand the siutaion a little bit better. Best regards - Tom
-
Hi Christophe Thank you for your feedback. I understand that a reverse proxy would be a workaround for this issue, but this is unfortanetly not an option for this setup (serveral reasons). As far as i understand, the app_root_url parameter within the config-file is the value, that will be used as value for linking the CSS/JS files. For some setups it would be possible to add another IP than the local IP to the configuration-file and if your gateway is properly configured, then it would be possible...
-
Hi all We have problems using TeemIP behind NAT because a lot of CSS/JS files and scripts are statically linked to the current/real IP-address within the HEAD section - in fact we can not use TeemIP. Are there any ongoing improvements regarding this limitation? Best regards Tom
-
Hi all We have problems using TeemIP behind NAT because a lot of CSS/JS files are statically linked to the current/real IP-address within the HEAD section - in fact we can not use TeemIP. Are there any ongoing improvements regarding this limitation? Best regards Tom
-
Hi all We have problems using TeemIP behind NAT because a lot of CSS files are statically linked within the HEAD section - in fact we can not use it. Are there any ongoing improvements regarding this limitation? Best regards Tom
-
Hi Steven My statement was: Btw: With the older clonezilla version 2.4.5-23 against FreeBSD 10.3 i was able to resize a UFS Root-Partition when it was created with -q2 (partclone instead of dd). Any ideas why this is not possible anymore?" More details about that: Correct is, FreeBSD changed since a specific version (can't recall what version anymore) from MBR to GPT. This is the reason why it has worked in the past. The MBR was not proportionally expanded, but the GPT partition is proportionally...
-
Hi Steven My statement was: Btw: With the older clonezilla version 2.4.5-23 against FreeBSD 10.3 i was able to resize a UFS Root-Partition when it was created with -q2 (partclone instead of dd). Any ideas why this is not possible anymore?" More details about that: Correct is, FreeBSD changed since a specific version (can't recall what version anymore) from MBR to GPT. This is the reason why it has worked in the past. The MBR was not proportionally expanded, but the GPT partition is proportionally...
-
Hi Steven My statement was: Btw: With the older clonezilla version 2.4.5-23 against FreeBSD 10.3 i was able to resize a UFS Root-Partition when it was created with -q2 (partclone instead of dd). Any ideas why this is not possible anymore?" More details about that: Correct is, FreeBSD changed since a specific version (can't recall what version anymore) from MBR to GPT. This is the reason why it has worked in the past. The MBR was not proportionally expanded, but the GPT partition is proportionally...
-
Hi Steven My statement was: Btw: With the older clonezilla version 2.4.5-23 against FreeBSD 10.3 i was able to resize a UFS Root-Partition when it was created with -q2 (partclone instead of dd). Any ideas why this is not possible anymore?" More details about that: Correct is, FreeBSD changed since a specific version (can't recall what version anymore) from MBR to GPT. This is the reason why it has worked in the past. The MBR was not proportionally expanded, but the GPT partition is proportionally...
-
Hi Steven My statement was: Btw: With the older clonezilla version 2.4.5-23 against FreeBSD 10.3 i was able to resize a UFS Root-Partition when it was created with -q2 (partclone instead of dd). Any ideas why this is not possible anymore?" More details about that: Correct is, FreeBSD changed since a specific version (can't recall what version anymore) from MBR to GPT. This is the reason why it has worked in the past. The MBR was not proportionally expanded, but the GPT partition is proportionally...
-
Hi Steven I wrote something that was not correct. My statement was: Btw: With the older clonezilla version 2.4.5-23 against FreeBSD 10.3 i was able to resize a UFS Root-Partition when it was created with -q2 (partclone instead of dd). Any ideas why this is not possible anymore?" Correct is, FreeBSD changed since a specific version (can't recall what version anymore) from MBR to GPT. This is probably the reason why it has worked in the past. I'm not sure about it. Probably it was also because it was...
-
Hi Steven I wrote something that was not correct. My statement was: Btw: With the older clonezilla version 2.4.5-23 against FreeBSD 10.3 i was able to resize a UFS Root-Partition when it was created with -q2 (partclone instead of dd). Any ideas why this is not possible anymore?" Correct is, FreeBSD changed since a specific version (can't recall what version anymore) from MBR to GPT. This is probably the reason why it has worked in the past. I'm not sure about it. Probably it was also because it was...
-
Hi Steven I wrote something that was not correct. My statement was: Btw: With the older clonezilla version 2.4.5-23 against FreeBSD 10.3 i was able to resize a UFS Root-Partition when it was created with -q2 (partclone instead of dd). Any ideas why this is not possible anymore?" Correct is, FreeBSD changed since a specific version (can't recall what version anymore) from MBR to GPT. This is probably the reason why it has worked in the past. I'm not sure about it. Probably it was also because it was...
-
Hi Steven I wrote something that was not correct. My statement was: Btw: With the older clonezilla version 2.4.5-23 against FreeBSD 10.3 i was able to resize a UFS Root-Partition when it was created with -q2 (partclone instead of dd). Any ideas why this is not possible anymore?" Correct is, FreeBSD changed since a specific version (can't recall what version anymore) from MBR to GPT. This is probably the reason why it has worked in the past. I'm not sure about it. Additionally i found out, if i restore...
-
Hi Steven I wrote something that was not correct. My statement was: Btw: With the older clonezilla version 2.4.5-23 against FreeBSD 10.3 i was able to resize a UFS Root-Partition when it was created with -q2 (partclone instead of dd). Any ideas why this is not possible anymore?" Correct is, FreeBSD changed since a specific version (can't recall what version anymore) from MBR to GPT. This is probably the reason why it has worked in the past. Additionally i found out, if i restore the image including...
-
Hi all I create a self bootable ISO file with clonezilla to restore an image, is there a way i can modify the ISO file that a script will be executed at the end of the restore process and before the poweroff/reboot? Tom
-
Hi all First of all, thanks a lot for the clonezilla project and all developers, the product helped me a lot during last few years. Today i faced a problem if i try to restore a FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p4 installation. FreeBSD was installed on a 60GB SSD Disk. The installation should be restored to a 120GB SSD Disk Those filesystems are present on the source disk: /dev/sda1 ' Boot-Partition /dev/sda2 ufs ' Root-Partition /dev/sda3 ' Swap-Partition The filesystems have those original source sizes: Number...
-
Hi all First of all, thanks a lot for the clonezilla project and all developers, the product helped me a lot during last few years. Today i faced a problem if i try to restore a FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p4 installation. FreeBSD was installed on a 60GB SSD Disk. The installation should be restored to a 120GB SSD Disk Those filesystems are present on the source disk: /dev/sda1 ' Boot-Partition /dev/sda2 ufs ' Root-Partition /dev/sda3 ' Swap-Partition The filesystems have those original source sizes: Number...
-
Hi all First of all, thanks a lot for the clonezilla project and all developers, the product helped me a lot during last few years. Today i faced a problem if i try to restore a FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p4 installation. FreeBSD was installed on a 60GB SSD Disk. The installation should be restored to a 120GB SSD Disk Those filesystems are present on the source disk: /dev/sda1 ' Boot-Partition /dev/sda2 ufs ' Root-Partition /dev/sda3 ' Swap-Partition The filesystems have those original source sizes: Number...
-
Hi all First of all, thanks a lot for the clonezilla project and all developers, the product helped me a lot during last few years. Today i faced a problem if i try to restore a FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p4 installation. FreeBSD was installed on a 60GB SSD Disk. The installation should be restored to a 120GB SSD Disk Those filesystems are present on the source disk: /dev/sda1 ' Boot-Partition /dev/sda2 ufs ' Root-Partition /dev/sda3 ' Swap-Partition The filesystems have those original source sizes: Number...
-
Hi all First of all, thanks a lot for the clonezilla project and all developers, the product helped me a lot during last few years. Today i faced a problem if i try to restore a FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p4 installation. FreeBSD was installed on a 60GB SSD Disk. The installation should be restored to a 120GB SSD Disk Those filesystems are present on the source disk: /dev/sda1 ' Boot-Partition /dev/sda2 ufs ' Root-Partition /dev/sda3 ' Swap-Partition The filesystems have those original source sizes: Number...
-
Hi all First of all, thanks a lot for the clonezilla project and all developers, the product helped me a lot during last few years. Today i faced a problem if i try to restore a FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p4 installation. FreeBSD was installed on a 60GB SSD Disk. The installation should be restored to a 120GB SSD Disk Those filesystems are present on the source disk: /dev/sda1 ' Boot-Partition /dev/sda2 ufs ' Root-Partition /dev/sda3 ' Swap-Partition The filesystems have those original source sizes: Number...
-
Hi all First of all, thanks a lot for the clonezilla project and all developers, the product helped me a lot during last few years. Today i faced a problem if i try to restore a FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p4 installation. FreeBSD was installed on a 60GB SSD Disk. The installation should be restored to a 120GB SSD Disk Those filesystems are present on the source disk: /dev/sda1 ' Boot-Partition /dev/sda2 ufs ' Root-Partition /dev/sda3 ' Swap-Partition The filesystems have those original source sizes: Number...
-
Hi all First of all, thanks a lot for the clonezilla project and all developers, the product helped me a lot during last few years. Today i faced a problem if i try to restore a FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p4 installation. FreeBSD was installed on a 60GB SSD Disk. The installation should be restored to a 120GB SSD Disk Those filesystems are present on the source disk: /dev/sda1 ' Boot-Partition /dev/sda2 ufs ' Root-Partition /dev/sda3 ' Swap-Partition The filesystems have those original source sizes: Number...
-
Hi all First of all, thanks a lot for the clonezilla project and all developers, the product helped me a lot during last few years. Today i faced a problem if i try to restore a FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p4 installation. FreeBSD was installed on a 60GB SSD Disk. The installation should be restored to a 120GB SSD Disk Those filesystems are present on the source disk: /dev/sda1 ' Boot-Partition /dev/sda2 ufs ' Root-Partition /dev/sda3 ' Swap-Partition The filesystems have those original source sizes: Number...
-
Hi all First of all, thanks a lot for the clonezilla project and all developers, the product helped me a lot during last few years. Today i faced a problem if i try to restore a FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p4 installation. FreeBSD was installed on a 60GB SSD Disk. The installation should be restored to a 120GB SSD Disk Those filesystems are present on the source disk: /dev/sda1 ' Boot-Partition /dev/sda2 ufs ' Root-Partition /dev/sda3 ' Swap-Partition The filesystems have those original source sizes: Number...
-
Hi all First of all, thanks a lot for the clonezilla project and all developers, the product helped me a lot during last few years. Today i faced a problem if i try to restore a FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p4 installation. FreeBSD was installed on a 60GB SSD Disk. The installation should be restored to a 120GB SSD Disk Those filesystems are present on the source disk: /dev/sda1 ' Boot-Partition /dev/sda2 ufs ' Root-Partition /dev/sda3 ' Swap-Partition The filesystems have those original source sizes: Number...
-
-
Hi all, Compliment on this project and thank for the work that was spend on this....
1
