The Unix world used the terms mount and unmount since the beginning. man umount Either way, demount/dismount and everything else but unmount is wrong in this context.
What I'm saying is that someone should change the term. I don't really care what TC used, since it's dead. I'm saying that the term is completely wrong and if you are an English speaker, it startles you every time you read it.
I think I've mentioned this a while back (a few years ago). There is no dismount term in IT. It's called unmount. Every time I read dismount it gives me a jolt. One dismounts a horse or a bike, but not a disk. Please change this accordingly. I know that this is not that important, but it is just horribly wrong. Cheers, K. C.
Thank you very much for the detailed information. I guess this guy is selling the exploit to LEOs. The problem is I can't recall which Veracrypt version I used to create the volume. Copying a few terabytes twice is time consuming and I hoped to avoid it.
No, I don't. I still don't understand why there's no tool to determine if one has to recreate the volume. Apparently there's a way to determine, if there's a hidden volume (if created with earlier versions). So there should be a tool that returns either "No, you are good." or "You have to recreate the volume."
In the release notes the following statement needs clarification: To avoid hinting whether your volumes contain a hidden volume or not, or if you depend on plausible deniability when using hidden volumes/OS, then you must recreate both the outer and hidden volumes including system encryption and hidden OS, discarding existing volumes created prior to 1.18a version of VeraCrypt. Is there a way to determine which version was used to create a volume? (e.g. I can't remember when I created the volume)...
Thanks for getting back to me. Don't worry about the typos. They are not important. I understand that coding is more important. It always takes me half the time to code stuff than to write the documentation. ;-) The main reason was to get the info on how to contact you, especially since you asked for ideas, feedback, and suggestions later on that page as well and there was just no way to actually do that. (Apart from this bug tracker, which is rather dated - and I stopped using sf years ago.)
how to contact Nigel?
Anyone? I really could need some help.
the comment in the codeblock should be: # [yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss.uuuuuu +0000]
how to parse custom date format
I understand, but I wasn't quite sure, if you even received an email update. I've...
Hey Patrick. I'd really appreciate an answer to my previous question. I gladly request...
Hmm, I can decrypt emails with enigmail and everything works, when using gpg on the...
Thanks for your reply. I just tried the steps you posted above, but nothing has changed....
The error message is: Error - encryption command failed /usr/local/bin/gpg --charset...
I was able to remove all keys with md5 fingerprint, but Enigmail still gives me an...
I was able to remove all keys with md5 fingerprint, but Enigmail still gives me an...
I was able to remove all keys with md5 fingerprint, but Enigmail still gives me an...
I was able to remove all keys with md5 fingerprint, but Enigmail still gives me an...
No I did not. That's my point. But on my other machine I was able to remove all keys...
Update: I tried your approach just for testing purposes, but there seems to be a...
Hmm, this might be a problem, since some people still use those weak keys. But I...
Key Management does not list any keys when allow-weak-digest-algos is not set in...
Key Management does not list any keys when allow-weak-digest-algos is not set in...
Key Management does not list any keys when allow-weak-digest-algos is not set in...