Activity for Heiko Tappe

  • Heiko Tappe Heiko Tappe posted a comment on discussion Help

    Tried 4.0.21.Final. Unfortunately without success.

  • Heiko Tappe Heiko Tappe posted a comment on discussion Help

    Oops. Missed the method: org.jgroups.conf.XmlConfigurator.getInstance(Ljava/net/URL;) And it's correct. There is no getInstance with a URL param any more.

  • Heiko Tappe Heiko Tappe posted a comment on discussion Help

    Tried with CENTRAL_LOCK2. Same behaviour. As for 4.1.8 - I don't know if I can just replace the jgroups wildfly module 4.0.19.Final with 4.1.8. First attempt gives me a java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.jgroups.conf.XmlConfigurator.getInstance(Ljava/net/URL;)Lorg/jgroups/conf/XmlConfigurator

  • Heiko Tappe Heiko Tappe posted a comment on discussion Help

    I see a different behaviour. Client 1 obviously does not release the lock if a tryLock of client 2 is busy. There is no error. But I can tell from calling printLocks afterwards. Without a running tryLock of client 2 releasing the lock works as expected.

  • Heiko Tappe Heiko Tappe posted a comment on discussion Help

    As for the mcast_addr - I found this in my wildfly socket bindings config and removed it: <socket-binding name="jgroups-diagnostics" multicast-address="${jboss.jgroups.diagnostics_addr:192.168.1.21}" multicast-port="${jboss.jgroups.diagnostics_port:7500}"/>

  • Heiko Tappe Heiko Tappe posted a comment on discussion Help

    Oh. I just noticed that releasing the lock on client 1 does not succeed if client 2 is trying to get a lock with timeout. Is that the expected behaviour?

  • Heiko Tappe Heiko Tappe posted a comment on discussion Help

    Hmm. Things improved. A lot :-) But I am not exactly sure why. In the last tests I was so focused on the log messages ("Could not join ...") that I didn't check the lock functionality itself. And surprise - it works now, as far as I can tell! But the warnings in the log still remain. One thing I noticed was some strange socket binding with a multi cast address of "192.168.1.21". Maybe things got better after removing that. I will recheck... As for the lock functionality... What is the expected behaviour...

  • Heiko Tappe Heiko Tappe posted a comment on discussion Help

    I switched to 232.5.5.5 with no success. netstat -nr gives me: IPv4-Routentabelle =========================================================================== Aktive Routen: Netzwerkziel Netzwerkmaske Gateway Schnittstelle Metrik 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.7 192.168.1.21 25 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Auf Verbindung 127.0.0.1 331 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 Auf Verbindung 127.0.0.1 331 127.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 Auf Verbindung 127.0.0.1 331 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 Auf Verbindung 192.168.1.21 281 192.168.1.21...

  • Heiko Tappe Heiko Tappe posted a comment on discussion Help

    Here is what I got... I explicitly defined UDP like this: <UDP mcast_port="${jgroups.udp.mcast_port:45588}" mcast_addr="${jgroups.udp.mcast_addr:224.0.0.0}" bind_addr="${jgroups.bind_addr:192.168.1.21}" receive_on_all_interfaces="true" enable_diagnostics="true" /> When I start my server (Wildfly 17.0.1.Final) and call probe like this: $ java -cp jgroups-4.0.19.Final.jar -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true org.jgroups.tests.Probe I get 0 responses (0 matches, 0 non matches) If I then init the LockService...

  • Heiko Tappe Heiko Tappe posted a comment on discussion Help

    Let's start with: I am a newbie to jgroups. So be patient with me ;-) What I try to achieve are distributed locks. Right now I do my first tests locally with one node. And some things seem to work already (a bit): I can get a lock and a second attempt in the same session (same lock service instance) to get a lock fails. But another instance of the lock service does not seem to "see" any locks held by the other "session". The problem might be related to the warnings I see in the server log: WARN [org.jgroups.protocols.UDP]...

  • Heiko Tappe Heiko Tappe posted a comment on discussion Vote

    VOTE: firebird

1