Steve Wampler

Avoid name collision with ipl, provide faster factoring of large integers

Improve accuracy of is_prime procedure

Support large integer primes, fix typos in matrix_util.icn

I wonder if at least some of the problem is with utr9? Have you tried the 3d features as covered in utr22? Just glancing at it it's 4 years newer and there are definite differences. On 1/2/25 07:08, Sergey Logichev wrote: Happy New Year! I've just getting to 3D features of Unicon. And I started with the basics (utr9 doc). Unfortunately, I have discovered that Unicon 13.2 is not working properly on my Windows 10 computer. There is a small program which I used: procedure main() w := open("3D", "gl",...

For what it's worth I did get the example on pages 18+19 of utr9d to run and display - but the output did not match the pictures show in the doc (parts were missing from the displayed room and image was in grayscale, not color). On 1/2/25 07:52, Steve Wampler wrote: When I run this under Ubuntu Linux (22.04) I get an error message that you're not seeing under Windows: ->draw glVersion: 4.6 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 24.0.3-1pop1~1711635559~22.04~7a9f319~dev glvendor: Intel glrenderer: Mesa Intel(R)...

When I run this under Ubuntu Linux (22.04) I get an error message that you're not seeing under Windows: ->draw glVersion: 4.6 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 24.0.3-1pop1~1711635559~22.04~7a9f319~dev glvendor: Intel glrenderer: Mesa Intel(R) UHD Graphics (CML GT2) dim: 3 eyepos: 0.00,0.00,0.00 eyedir: 0.00,0.00,-100.00 X Error of failed request: GLXBadDrawable Major opcode of failed request: 152 (GLX) Minor opcode of failed request: 11 (X_GLXSwapBuffers) Serial number of failed request: 43 Current serial...

Fix UniDoc to handle single-line compound expressions. Also fixes bug in handleng continued csets and strings.

I haven't played with the networking facilities but does the information in the Unicon book (available via pdf from the Unicon website and starting on page 77 [I think...]) contain anything that helps? On 9/1/24 19:11, Jos Runarka wrote: Hi Jaffar, thanks a lot! How can I miss THAT thread, how embarassing :-). The two liners work like a breeze. Now I am sure that my Unicon build was okay. Your example in the discussion was intended for UDP. Using it for TCP and change "nu" and "nua" to "n" and "na"....