Moving to GitHub
Interesting. https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SS6SG3_4.2.0/com.ibm.entcobol.doc_4.2/PGandLR/ref/rldadgrp.htm "When specified at the group level, the USAGE clause applies to each elementary item in the group. The usage of elementary items must not contradict the usage of a group to which the elementary items belongs."
Interesting. Can you provide a language reference link that shows this to be valid COBO?. The IBM 4.2 language reference doesn't seem to permit this. It's an interesting technique, and I didn't know the language permitted it. https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SS6SG3_4.2.0/com.ibm.entcobol.doc_4.2/PGandLR/ref/rldadgrp.htm Talks about National groups for Usage is National to permit Unicode. It doesn't mention Usage is Computational to provide a parent-level definition.
Interesting. Can you provide a language reference link that shows this to be valid COBOL. The 4.2 language reference doesn't seem to permit this. It's an interesting technique, and I didn't know the language permitted it.
Home
Due to my really dumb choice of names, this is difficult. There's a setup.py available...
Due to a really dumb choice of names, this is difficult. There's a setup.py available...
MacBookPro-SLott:pyweb slott$ rst2html.py --version rst2html.py (Docutils 0.12 [release],...
change to cobol.defs.DDE incompatible with python 3.4
Build Instructions Wrong
Windows Build Failure
SKIP2 causes problems
SKIP2 and SKIP3 added to ignored syntax.
66 level RENAMES causes problems
Added unit test cases. Looks to be fixed.
cobol.loader.picture_parser problem with precision using (#) syntax
number_display incorrect for signed EBCDIC fields
Change Handling of 1-byte values.
66 level RENAMES causes problems
cobol.loader.picture_parser problem with precision using (#) syntax
number_display incorrect for signed EBCDIC fields
Important: The field in question is defined as a PIC S9. The raw EBCDIC value is...
cobol.loader.picture_parser problem with precision using (#) syntax
cobol.loader.picture_parser problem with precision using (#) syntax
To be slightly more general. if decimal: precision += irpt Not sure of PIC 9(5)V99(2)...
bdw_iter() consuming 2 records at a time
Test case revised to show multiple records per block.
That indicates a unit testing error. Here's data used to test a VB file with a BDW...
That indicates a unit testing error. Here's data used to test a VB file with a BDW...
Fix the cobol.RECFM_VB file handling
Updated the bdw_iter() method of the cobol.RECFM_VB class as suggested in the bug...
Updated the bdw_iter() method of the cobol.RECFM_VB class as suggested in the bug...
Problem with cobol.bdw_iter
Python 3.4 Correction in release 2.3.2
How to install pyWeb 2.3.1?
https://bugs.python.org/issue7994 has cleaned up the way the {:s} format string works....
https://bugs.python.org/issue7994 has cleaned up the way the {:s} format string ...
In Python 3.3 this seems to work. Therefore, it seems likely to be some kind of Python3.4...
There's a README. http://pywebtool.sourceforge.net/#the-readme-file But that's not...
I would prefer to simply make you a contributor to the project. -- S. Lott Whitby...
I would prefer to make you a contributor so that you can make all the changes you...
I can make you a maintainer, which might make it easier to supply corrections and...
Fix the COBOL Schema Parser Functions
Fix the COBOL Schema Parser Functions
Here's another approach: fix the COBOL_schemata function to take the lexer class...
Here's an approach 250 with tempfile.TemporaryFile(mode='w+') as stripped_copybook:...
Here's the definition of COBOL_schemata. def COBOL_schemata( source, replacing=None...
Release 4.4.4 may solve this via "subrecord" processing. See :py:class:stingray.test.cobol_2.Test_Copybook_13(...
"the different segments define the data that may be found within RDT-ADDL-DATA" Aha....
"the different segments define the data that may be found within RDT-ADDL-DATA" Aha....
I understand how to parse a workbook using one schema or another, but I'm not sure...
The RENAMES has been reset to be merely a warning instead of an unsupported exception....
66 level RENAMES causes problems
In effect a RENAMES is another kind of group-level item. The offset begins at the...
SKIP2 causes problems
There are four relatively common "Compiler-Directing Statements" that must be filtered...
COBOL Schema vs. COBOL Schemata
ODO SetSizeAndOffset
Release 4.4.3 Bug Fixes and Small API Change
ODO SetSizeAndOffset
The exception shows a single byte value (b'\x00') for a two-byte COMP field. How...
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PI07821 "The behavior is undefined...
Problem opening XLSX file
This is a lack of clarity in the documentation. The demo/app.py doesn't work with...
The demo/app.py isn't really designed to work with the .xlsx files. It doesn't use...
What's the ODO definition? And the definition on which it depends? An OCCURS DEPENDING...
Split large files
RECFM_VB while offset<= len(block_data)
setSizeandOffset group size calculation incorrect after first pass
Version 4.4.2
Version 4.4.2
Code Update to 4.4.1.
setSizeandOffset group size calculation incorrect after first pass
Improper ODO Calculation
See Ticket #15 -- same problem.
Aha! That's a big gap in the unit test, too! Sweet! Sent from my iPhone On May 9,...
There seems to be a "maximum length rule" for complex ODO structures. It's possible...
Code Update to 4.4.1.
RECFM_VB while offset<= len(block_data)
Switching to Git
Switching to Git
3136 == 0x0C40 The 0x40 is an EBCDIC space character. Not sure of this is relevant....
3136 == 0x0C40 The 0x40 is an EBCDIC space character. Not sure of this is releva...
3136 == 0x40 an EBCDIC space character.
Improper ODO Calculation
Appears to be a bug in RECFM_VB. If offset == len(block_data), then the offset is...
Appears to be a bug in RECFM_VB. If offset == len(block_data), then the offset is...
RECFM_VB while offset<= len(block_data)
Appears to be a bug in RECFM_VB. BTW, neither solution will work. If offset == len(block_data),...
Add RECFM=N
COBOL Parser error on copybooks with data in positions 72:80
number_comp3 and precision0 causes misplaced decimal
multiple 01 level records is misunderstood
cobol defs UsageDisplay return
Version 4.3.4
Version 4.3.3
The RECFM=N requires a small change to the API for RECFM and EBCDIC file.
Add RECFM=N
Add RECFM=N
Version 4.3.3