Stefan James

Hi Mikael, John has updated the scamp firmware and I've just tried it, but unfortunately the USB problem on windows persists. Regards, Stefan.

Great, thanks Mikael.

Hi, I've updated my scamp boards with the latest Udamonic firmware, but Windows 10/11 is unable to detect the USB-CDC and returns Unknown USB Device (Invalid configuration descriptor). Rolling back to the previous Scamp3 release works fine. I have no trouble running the latest version firmware on Linux. Could this be a windows-only issue with the latest FlashForth release?

Hi, I've updated my scamp boards with the latest Udamonic firmware, but Windows 10/11 is unable to detect the USB-CDC and returns Unknown USB Device (Invalid configuration descriptor). Rolling back to the previous Scamp3 release works fine. I have no trouble running the previous version firmware on Windows. Could this be an issue with the latest FlashForth release?

Exciting news Peter, interactive line editing and history sounds like a great enhancement. Many thanks for making this available, Tachyon is a great Forth implementation.

Hi Peter, as soon as I enter !ED the P2 resets. I tried entering each word of !ED at the terminal and it resets when I type 256 KB FSIZE!. FSIZE! appears to be an ALIAS for FMAKE but I don't seem to have that defined. Is there another file that I need to load first? UPDATE: I found FMAKE in FLAT32.FTH, added it to FRED.FTH and now I'm up and running.

Hi Peter, as soon as I enter !ED the P2 resets. I tried entering each word of !ED at the terminal and it resets when I type 256 KB FSIZE!. FSIZE! appears to be an ALIAS for FMAKE but I don't seem to have that defined. Is there another file that I need to load first?

I can't get it to run for some reason. I'm using a P2 eval board and loaded the latest TAQOZ and it reports the same version as your screenshot. I've tried sending with ./s FRED USB0 10 and the terminal waits a while before reporting 645 lines of code loaded. Then, when I type 'ED' it resets the P2. I've also tried pasting the code in with the same result. It's probably something obvious but I'm not seeing it at the moment. Any ideas?