User Activity

  • Posted a comment on discussion Discussions on UnboundID LDAP SDK for Java

    Thank you Neil!!! We are looking to test and schedule for implementation!!

  • Posted a comment on discussion Discussions on UnboundID LDAP SDK for Java

    Hi Neil, We did some more testing and found that the round robin server set is not optimal for our use cases. It seems the fastest connection server set will be better, though we still need to do some rigorous testing around that one. What is the procedure to follow to get a feature, such as the temporary blacklist added? Thanks very much for your assistance in our case. Robert

  • Modified a comment on discussion Discussions on UnboundID LDAP SDK for Java

    Hi Neil, Thanks very much for taking the time to respond to our inquiries. Your descriptions are very detailed and helpful here. Your first assumption is correct for what I meant by “a directory server is up and available, but the DSA on the server is not”. Yesterday we did some testing with the roundrobinserverset and were successful in not losing any connections while a server was down (i.e. rebooting in this case). We did determine that the directory idle connection timeout needs to be greater...

  • Modified a comment on discussion Discussions on UnboundID LDAP SDK for Java

    Hi Neil, Thanks very much for taking the time to respond to our inquiries. Your descriptions are very detailed and helpful here. Your first assumption is correct for what I meant by “a directory server is up and available, but the DSA on the server is not”. Yesterday we did some testing with the roundrobinserverset and were successful in not losing any connections while a server was down (i.e. rebooting in this case). We did determine that the directory idle connection timeout needs to be greater...

  • Modified a comment on discussion Discussions on UnboundID LDAP SDK for Java

    Hi Neil, Thanks very much for taking the time to respond to our inquiries. Your descriptions are very detailed and helpful here. Your first assumption is correct for what I meant by “a directory server is up and available, but the DSA on the server is not”. Yesterday we did some testing with the roundrobinserverset and were successful in not losing any connections while a server was down (i.e. rebooting in this case). We did determine that the directory idle connection timeout needs to be greater...

  • Posted a comment on discussion Discussions on UnboundID LDAP SDK for Java

    Hi Neil, Thanks very much for taking the time to respond to our inquiries. Your descriptions are very detailed and helpful here. Your first assumption is correct for what I meant by “a directory server is up and available, but the DSA on the server is not”. Yesterday we did some testing with the roundrobinserverset and were successful in not losing any connections while a server was down (i.e. rebooting in this case). We did determine that the directory idle connection timeout needs to be greater...

  • Posted a comment on discussion Discussions on UnboundID LDAP SDK for Java

    Hi Neil, Thank you for your swift responses to our inquiries. I’m working with Jorge on the issue we’re having/had and manage the data layer of the application stack in question here. In response to your question about a notification when the directory closes idle connections; I did some investigation and there are no standards, X.500 or LDAP, that requires the directory server to send the client a notification when idle connections are closed by the directory. (The client may have just left the...

View All

Personal Data

Username:
rsdirman
Joined:
2019-05-15 12:53:18

Projects

  • No projects to display.

Personal Tools