Ricky Tigg

Lack of mention of package needed for providing UI perl module

Package removal seems not supported in CLI

Query not covering all pre-defined package groups when specified package for '-package' is alone as attribute

I must have been willing to announce a good news. Nonetheless it seems that an issue is alive. $ rpmorphan -fullalgo -guess-all -package python-rpm-macros python-rpm-macros $ rpm -e --test python-rpm-macros error: Failed dependencies: (python-rpm-macros if rpm-build) is needed by (installed) python2.7-2.7.18-26.fc37.x86_64 $ rpm -q --whatrequires python-rpm-macros python2.7-2.7.18-26.fc37.x86_64 Wouldn't it be relevant to calll either rpm -e --test or rpm -q --whatrequires in order to prevent packages...

I must have been willing to announce a good news. Nonetheless it seems that an issue is alive. $ rpmorphan -package python-rpm-macros $ rpm -e --test python-rpm-macros error: Failed dependencies: (python-rpm-macros if rpm-build) is needed by (installed) python2.7-2.7.18-26.fc37.x86_64 $ rpm -q --whatrequires python-rpm-macros python2.7-2.7.18-26.fc37.x86_64 Wouldn't it be relevant to calll either rpm -e --test or rpm -q --whatrequires in order to prevent packages having failed dependencies from being...

I recently used the rpmorphan function. A pertinent investigation, which was not the case at the time i posted the present, indicated that it behaved as intended and thus, Unreliable output as title was non-founded. Instead it can be noticed that is has reliable output. Can at last me moved from [pending] to [closed].

Messages sent to e-mail mentioned in documentations fail to be delivered

Relevant complementary mention along with the version