Activity for Ricky Tigg
-
Ricky Tigg created ticket #11
Lack of mention of package needed for providing UI perl module
-
Package removal seems not supported in CLI
-
Query not covering all pre-defined package groups when specified package for '-package' is alone as attribute
-
I must have been willing to announce a good news. Nonetheless it seems that an issue is alive. $ rpmorphan -fullalgo -guess-all -package python-rpm-macros python-rpm-macros $ rpm -e --test python-rpm-macros error: Failed dependencies: (python-rpm-macros if rpm-build) is needed by (installed) python2.7-2.7.18-26.fc37.x86_64 $ rpm -q --whatrequires python-rpm-macros python2.7-2.7.18-26.fc37.x86_64 Wouldn't it be relevant to calll either rpm -e --test or rpm -q --whatrequires in order to prevent packages...
-
I must have been willing to announce a good news. Nonetheless it seems that an issue is alive. $ rpmorphan -package python-rpm-macros $ rpm -e --test python-rpm-macros error: Failed dependencies: (python-rpm-macros if rpm-build) is needed by (installed) python2.7-2.7.18-26.fc37.x86_64 $ rpm -q --whatrequires python-rpm-macros python2.7-2.7.18-26.fc37.x86_64 Wouldn't it be relevant to calll either rpm -e --test or rpm -q --whatrequires in order to prevent packages having failed dependencies from being...
-
I recently used the rpmorphan function. A pertinent investigation, which was not the case at the time i posted the present, indicated that it behaved as intended and thus, Unreliable output as title was non-founded. Instead it can be noticed that is has reliable output. Can at last me moved from [pending] to [closed].
-
Messages sent to e-mail mentioned in documentations fail to be delivered
-
Relevant complementary mention along with the version
-
Bring consistency to documentation | '-package', '-exclude' and '-add-keep'
-
Path reported instead of last use-date
-
@jogybl |Code reviewing is a competence i don't have. I blindly trust the competence of your colleagues in this regard.
-
I was already pleased to acquire this software on Windows' side as FOSS. I wish i could have a translation file to make the interface language in Finnish.
-
@vattila | "Windows convention uses powers of two" Note: validity of statements "power of two" and "power of ten not yet examined. Be the expression "<power> of <base></power>" (n of b) with n for <power>, b for <base>. In the context of digital storage size, in common sense the expression is valid for each n, (integer >0) . Values 2, 10, 1024 and 1000 of b are involved in this context in various literature. profane and canonical, then we can examine formulae that support them.</power> Values 1024...
-
@vattila | "Windows convention uses powers of two" Note: validity of statements "power of two" and "power of ten not yet examined. Be the expression "<power> of <base></power>" (n of b) with n for <power>, b for <base>. In the context of digital storage size, in common sense the expression is valid for each n, (integer >0) . Values 2, 10, 1024 and 1000 of b are involved in this context in various literature. profane and canonical, then we can examine formulae that support them.</power> Values 1024...
-
@vattila | "Windows convention uses powers of two" Note: validity of statements "power of two" and "power of ten not yet examined. Be the expression "<power> of <base></power>" (n of b) with n for <power>, b for <base>. In the context of digital storage size, in common sense the expression is valid for each n, (integer >0) . Values 2, 10, 1024 and 1000 of b are involved in this context in various literature. profane and canonical, then we can examine formulae that support them.</power> Values 1024...
-
@vattila | "Windows convention uses powers of two" Note: validity of statements "power of two" and "power of ten not yet examined. Be the expression "<power> of <base></power>" (n of b) with n for <power>, b for <base>. In the context of digital storage size, in common sense the expression is valid for each n, (integer >0) . Values 2, 10, 1024 and 1000 of b are involved in this context in various literature. profane and canonical, then we can examine formulae that support them.</power> Values 1024...
-
@vattila | "Windows convention uses powers of two" Note: validity of statements "power of two" and "power of ten not yet examined. Be the expression "<power> of <base></power>" (n of b) with n for <power>, b for <base>. In the context of digital storage size, in common sense the expression is valid for each n, (integer >0) . Values 2, 10, 1024 and 1000 of b are involved in this context in various literature. profane and canonical, then we can examine formulae that support them.</power> Values 1024...
-
@vattila | "Windows convention uses powers of two" Note: validity of statements "power of two" and "power of ten not yet examined. Be the expression "<power> of <base></power>" (n of b) with n for <power>, b for <base>. In the context of digital storage size, in common sense the expression is valid for each n, (integer >0) . Values 2, 10, 1024 and 1000 of b are involved in this context in various literature. profane and canonical, then we can examine formulae that support them.</power> Values 1024...
-
References: https://www.iso.org, https://ansi.org "FolderSize: Size units based on powers of 2 " | Developers, not quite a valid title you set. Well, back to school! Smallest units size prefixes symbols according to SI and ISO/IEC in this regard are dully documented respectively as k (kilo) and Ki (kibi) which are themselves according to b^n, where b is the base and n the exponent (n, integer >0), respectively power of 1000 ((10^3)^n, 1000^n) and power of 1024 ((2^10)^n, 1024^n). Assign value 1 for...
-
FolderSize | Addition of option for expressing digital storage sizes in byte
-
FolderSize | Wrong size convention used
-
FolderSize |
-
Hardware with TPM 1.2 chip not supported by Trousers.
-
I confirm that version 2.40 (Dev 181107) works as intended –attachment Keepassv._2.40_Dev_181107_password_generator_options.png – using suggested tool – on my system outdated: (4.8.0-12); last stable (5.16.0.179) –. So mono is a tool; that's a new knowledge to me: $ rpm -qfi `which mono` Name : mono-core (...) Source RPM : mono-4.8.0-12.fc28.src.rpm (...) Vendor : Fedora Project URL : http://www.mono-project.com Summary : The Mono CIL runtime, suitable for running .NET code (...) I noticed that notched-wheel-illustrating...
-
wine.x86_64 3.19-1.fc29 won't allow to test snapshot sample on Linux Fedora; message produced: $ wine KeePass.exe 000b:fixme:winediag:start_process Wine Staging 3.19 is a testing version containing experimental patches. 000b:fixme:winediag:start_process Please mention your exact version when filing bug reports on winehq.org. 0009:fixme:mscoree:parse_startup useLegacyV2RuntimeActivationPolicy=L"true" not implemented 0009:fixme:mscoree:ConfigFileHandler_startElement Unknown element L"enforceFIPSPolicy"...
-
How lucky I am; Keepass v. 2 is easily among the 512 best FOSS applications present in Fedora repository, thanks to mono. I am only one of its users. In hope that some Fedora users –even a few more–would contribute undirectly to serve the purpose of Keepass developpers, I reported an aspect, possibly trivial, at Red Hat Bugzilla.
-
See attaxhement KeePass.config.xml.
-
I didn't have that intuition. I get in that order error messages: See attachment keepass_terminal_error.png– in GUI environment. While clicking on OK ithe folowing output is produced: – see attachment keepassterminalerror resulting from ' keepass >keepass_terminal_error' –.
-
– Indeed. KeePass is not running as illustrated here in second step: State: manin window active. Using top* command: $ top PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 27519 yk 20 0 727528 78960 35896 S 1,7 2,1 0:10.52 /usr/bin/mono --verify-all /usr/lib/keepass/KeePass.exe State: manin window closed as result of clicking on option Generate Password... As a result process desappears: $ top PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
-
– The one illustrated in attachment Keepass_v.2.40_Fedora.png. – From bar menu, Tools | Generate Password .... – Susequently operation passwords' preview cannot be operated. – No plug-ins installed: $ dnf list installed | grep -i keepass keepass.x86_64 2.40-1.fc29 @fedora
-
Clicking on option *Generate Password ...' closes the application window
-
Helpful command indeed. In 1955 it was an exception in European modern countries to work on Sundays; since then for far too many persons – including me sometimes – it’s common.
-
If I had to guess; it's probably due to the extra data processing that involves the validation test procedure.
-
So finally that non-reliability was no more than an issue ; 'rpm -e --test rpmorphan' won't produce appropriatly an stderr output, which you provided 'error: Failed dependencies: (...)'. It means a fix is required.
-
Unless you meant something else, it is then not aware of components – that belong to Fedora's repositories – installed using the function dnf, which is illustrated by the output resulting from the command: $ sudo dnf history userinstalled anaconda-28.22.11-1.fc28.x86_64 dracut-live-048-1.fc28.x86_64 kernel-4.16.3-301.fc28.x86_64 (...)
-
– Attachment is provided as object for comparison purpose – Current output and the one resulting from the folowing command are not identical, According to it, packages eligible for removing are: $ LANG=C dnf list autoremove >dnf_list_autoremove_output
-
That last command as well appeared not to be reliable.; when involved along with a package which is not listed as part of the output resulting from command 'rpmorphan' , it returned an stdout output while obviously an stderr output would have been appropriate. Case illustrated: $ rpm -e --test libvirt-daemon-kvm $ $ rpm -e --test rpmorphan $
-
Unreliable output
-
Considerations related to the official web site and links on sourceforge.net.
1
