Activity for Christos
-
Christos posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion
cant find "cnano" nowhere googli ! that why asking has 8051 family decided?
-
cost rising is significant since last year !!!! btw "testing hardware cnano ? whats this ? imho "application certificate" can be removed, i see other small companies/shareware who removed it , as its a ripoff, and only help in a warning of opening app !!! allow it and proceed ... so XOJO goes from 99 to 499 /year... nice pricing guys ;)
-
cost rising is significant since last year !!!! btw "testing hardware cnano ? whats this ? imho "application certificate" can be removed, i see other small companies/shareware who removed it , as its a ripoff, and only help in a warning of opening app !!! allow it and proceed ...
-
cost rising is significant since last year !!!! btw "testing hardware cnano ? whats this ?
-
after 9 months, is there any decition in support these chips ? (STC 8051compatible) yes/no ? family desided (if decided) ?
-
WELL DONE . look a step to the RIGHT direction imho! look simple which is a MUST for me. personally i am happy with small stuff like syntax hjighlight , F1 (help keyword), compiler run (F9) and basic stuff from editors cut/copy etc its cout full to my need more is welcome but not too much ! (VS code/ eclipse level) congrats, !
-
ok this happens in 4.x version in 3.3 works as expected ! note thats xbios(15,0... DOES actually 19200, but xbios(15,1... does 38400 !!!
-
ok this happens in 4.x version in 3.3 works as expected ! note tahts xbios(15,0... DOES actualyl 19200, but xbios(15,0 does 38400 !!!
-
ok this happens in 4.x version in 3.3 works as expected !
-
hello i am trynig serial port with a GFA basic as simpel as this VOID XBIOS(15,1,0,140,-1,-1,-1) OPEN "",#1,"AUX:" print #1,"etst" xbios command supposed to tweak uart baud rate but no mater what i do, steam works in 38400 baud (which is beyond ST anyway...) what/where this configured in steem ? thanx
-
yes but FAstAVR was for AVR, and also author has complete DISAPPEAR from earth's face :) anyway i am not claiming about MikroE, quality, i am just saying is maybe a nice "hint" to work at beginning. at any case MikroeBasic is an abandonware product so...
-
hoewever it is much simpler to use mikroe Basic, demo , which outpute normal asm :)
-
as above said all stc8 have build in bootloader fixed from factory and non removable you not nothing more than a serial TTL adaptor, the ONLY advantage of their own serial adaptor is that powercycle during programing, otherwise you must manually power off/on device to enter bootloader mode as for toolchain both alexander and i use ONLY basic, we used bascom, bascom has a free 4kb limited version but does NOT export asm , if that your point however if you are looking for asm output i may suggest mikrobasic...
-
not only you coulnt compile it, but you could also UNABLE to find a rp2040 / 2350 in 20 years so all of these projects will be dead :) microchip has a lot of bad points but also some good points aka one the longest running production of chips among all competitors... you can still get 16f84 a 32year old mcu to build these old projects :) also the posibility to evolve gcb to another mcu core, this one must taken in account (which in sort meand 8051 to my mind :))
-
very nice:-) i agree the feeleing of fixing some small things is incredible and every you type var= aleays come to mind :&)
-
if market share / availability of tools / and DEFINITELLY price are the factors then 8051 beats z80 in every aspect 8051 have million of tools, tens (hundrends) of ACTIVE manufacturers, and most chinese manufacture beat price/availabity to the "nail" like the suggested STC.. offcourse ARM is the hte most trend now, but i understand its a complete different 32/64bit beast starting support from the "bare industry standar" AT89S2051/89S52 is not a bad idea in order to get help from microchip :) but...
-
if market share / availabilty of tools / and DEFINITELLY price are the factors then 8051 beats z80 in every aspect 8051 have million of tools, tens (hundrends) of ACTIVE manufacturers, and most chinese manufacture beat price/availabity to the "nail" like the suggested STC.. offcourse ARM is the hte most trend now, but i understand its a complete different 32/64bit beast starting support from the "bare industry standar" AT89S2051/89S52 is not a bad idea in order to get help from microchip :) but the...
-
if market share / availabilty of tools / and DEFINITELLY price are the factors then 8051 beats z80 in every aspect 8051 have million of tools, tens (hundrends) of ACTIVE manufacturers, and most chinese manufacture beat price/availabity to the "nail" like the suggested STC.. offcourse ARM is the hte most trend now, but i understand its a complete different 32/64bit beast
-
i doupt ANY chinese company will be responsive in a competive languane. a guy tey most of them and practically noone reply however with STC found cheap and wide broad of mcu, including DIP versios also "good enouhg" datasheet . so make some .def and something start working...
-
hi does the 8051 family has been decided ? if not may i suggest STC like 8H and 8G families (8h1k17t and more) you get 2/4 uarts 33mhz 1clock intruction at 20cents or less and too much more. it has DIP versions too! relative good english datasheet stcmicro.com.
-
hi does the 8051 family has been decided ? if not may i suggest STC like 8h1k17t family (8H family) and 8G family you get 2/4 uarts 33mhz 1clock intruction at 20cnets or less and too much more relative good english datasheet stcmicro.com.
-
link in furniture for popup-image
-
only cost can reduced is the ssl which you can a get for free form letencrypt.com or sslforfree.com Why you think SourceFore will charge for cost, isnt free for opensource software ?!
-
32 bit arduino's are not 8bit netierh avr nor pic, they are arm mcu's so rewriting compiler is a huge job moving to same cpu with some changes is easier
-
cant help a lot (out of testing) however if work for a new family is decided AVR DB (or DA etc) should make more sense
-
i did in both tiny2313a and tiny2313 and works i believe should be ok , since tiny2313 is code combatible with 90s2313 (i just compile as 90s2313 gflash it to tiny and works) at any case the program i jsut posted works with USART=1 in tiny chipdata.. (verified)
-
From time to time there are questions about how to use wifi. Recently i found WizFi360, from Wiznet. https://www.wiznet.io/product-item/wizfi360/ it is very similar to ESP8266 in shape - firmware - cost as said "searching too long to find something to fit our need simple and cheap" Wink I have come across to use the ESP8266 many times, but the overloaded information lack (until recently) to proper english documentation from manufacturer etc, i had confused. In contrary wiznet products are easy to...
-
compiler error, however 90s2313 does complie/support !!! Great Cow BASIC (0.98.07 2021-08-24 (Windows 32 bit) : Build 1022)
-
i see thanx Not use ite yet, but example is self explanatory. However this means that i have to "compile+program" every time, which even not original asked, is not bad for now :)
-
mplab ide will better avoid it if possible, since i have to learn it :) intresting in gcbasic capabiliies
-
Hello can somehow have a data variable where this number will be increased every time i program a chip ? a production serial numbering
-
a bit out of topic but http://www.greatcowbasic.com is affiliated with this project or independed ? comes very high i google searching
-
isnt the cost extreme expensive? , if it is for covering anything else ok but .com domains cost here 20euro/2 years changing registra is easy and cost nothing....
-
328 dont drop at 3.3 3.3 is stable you can use external oscillator to be sure of frequency, but better create an output that flash per second you will understand if you wrong frequency at significant values i.e. accidedantly selct 1mhz instead of 8,, oscilloscope is even beter offcourse
-
dont see why it should fail at 3volt both devices you mention are safe working at 3v btw i also think 18f are a bit more "structrucal" inside than 16f devices
-
pic's are good too ;-) programmings in pics goes to PGC/PGD pin (along with reset and gnd offcourse) both pk2 nad 3 supports the main diffirence most people have who used to useAVR and try pic's its the extended use of configuration fuses/ for almost anythink for example in most chips you have to select pins to be digital and yes this is not a universal selected constant.. its diffirent and diffirent behaviur in each chip
-
no experience with nano, but "nano" are actually mega328 isn't ? so . adc has 2 input source referencess in mega328 , a) avcc which almost by definition you connect to power supply so avcc = vcc = 3.3 in your case b) internal reference 1.1 where "255 = 1.1volt" so in general answer is yes
-
the following video was created using my mobile camera, when created it has in "share link" an option "upload to google drive , it has upload to my account when uploaded , on the top screen pop down message has two options 1) share " 2) share link here is the link https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QzvpsDjizh-GH7AaCkDqdq2yqrYe-oN1/view i can directly view it from link
-
Do not understand your answer The behaviur you describe above happens when you press insert key There is key called insert. Try it to check if it yur
-
A problem I have with the forum and the gcb code editor is I accidently type a **wrong key** and find I am in a mode where every character I type deletes the following character. you Press INSERT thats a feature in most editors :)
-
english is not my native speaking language...as anyone can guess ;) firefox has spellchecker but it did NOT work here, i guess because of WYSIWYG editor. spellchecker is good and helpfull, true!
-
as most of casual-core users had reply, firstly i would like to thank all for their opinion. I see that except of me and mkstevo who really think that this forum is awfull from every possible aspect, thus no need to imporve everythink, all the rest are at least "ok with this. moving is offcourse possible, and if someone's time is needed to do the work, offcourse I can spend time for the moving. however since most are "ok" (dont understand why but thats it :)), maybe we can suggest some modification,...
-
as most of casual-core users had reply, firstly i would like to thank all for their opinion. I see that except of me and mkstevo who really think that this forum is awfull from every possible aspect, thus no need to imporve everythink, all the rest are at least "ok with this. moving is offcourse possible, and if someone's time is needed to do the work, offcourse I can spend time for the moving. however since most are "ok" (dont understand why but thats it :)), maybe we can suggest some modification,...
-
what does the word "assessment" mean? evaluate gain/loss ? if this is the meaning then the gain, in case most people find unfortable with this one, is that forusm will be easier for existing and new, or even visitors
-
my suggestion to all comunity is based in the fact that most people also, like me, found this forum difficult to use. if the majority of hte community feels ok with this forum, my suggestion has no point at all. move to new forums is like stop posting here (lock if possible) and change urls in site. anyone (new) who wants to find a forum obvioulsy it will first look in site for link. we can also investigate if it is possible to move current data, which will be the ideal solution.
-
my suggestion to all comunity is based in the fact that most people also, like me, found this forum difficult to use. if the majority of hte community feels ok with this forum, my suggestion has no point at all. move to new forums is like stop posting here (lock if possible) and change urls in site. anyone (new) who wants to find a forum obvioulsy it will first look in site for link.
-
yes searchworks, but it is limited, like filter post by user, category etc as for video, i think that vast majority of forums do not have video (not !?)
-
my suggestion to all comunity is based in the fact that most people also, like me, found this forum difficult to move. if the majority of hte community feels ok with this forum, my suggestion has no point at all. move to new forums is like stop posting here (lock if possible) and change urls in site. anyone (new) who wants to find a forum obvioulsy it will first look in site for link.
-
to my understing a "proper" forum like phpBB is better sourceforge is completely diffirent and "basic" and will remain basic since forum is an "add on" to something else (sf = code host/help /colaborate) moving can have may ways, like leaving posts here as is, and continue in a new home if majority agrees/wants to move its the first step, then we will look the rest
-
i know its free but its completely uncofortable. including the only option of RSS, for me is not covient, i dislike to have my mobile ring all the time, that why i have limited my Instamessaging appto minimun. for codeblock i see it now, maybe it was not existed back then, or i did see it. main problems are these )search tool, is very bad, not as expected t osearch for example. my posts, no optiosn at all )"recent posts since last visit" its my personal most used way to check news in all forums,...
-
push up, what do you thing about this ? this forum literary, makes visitng and searching repulse
-
I have try If var1= true then As i relpiied to kent to post 5 and this one works in tiny 85 bit not in tiny9 note that it compiles without
-
Will test afternoon but must latestg downloaded full
-
Var1=1 If var1 then The above compiles correct but do not work in chip While compiling for emg tiny85 does work ok on
-
Var1=1 If var1 then The above compiles correct but do not work in chip While compiling for emg tiny85 does work ok onside
-
What idea? Based on kemt research its true that tiny9 has only r15-31 so its logic with r0 in ise mot to work Simple tweaking in yasmyasmaea possible but if certain limitation exis I believe rhey should mention in docs For example "in tiny9" condition with variables is not
-
What idea?
-
if var2 true Then does not compile for any avr if var2=true then if var2=1 then etc do not execute inside tiny9 for a reason if PORTB.1 then it DOES execute, so i guess can not compare variables
-
but they are supported :) anyway i know it has some restrictiosn, original is "is there an alternative" ? i.e. any other way to choose between two variables in tiny9 ?
-
hi calling If variable then .. is NOT working with tiny9 is there an alternative way to check variabels in tiny9 ?
-
don;t know the reason, but just to note that i have a similar problem here https://sourceforge.net/p/gcbasic/discussion/579125/thread/86a4da91/...
-
i know that i am new, with small contribution however i see that sourceforge forum...
-
tried a do loop instead of wait 100 ms and yes i have all bytes at 300 baud as w...
-
whats new is online ? its same as offline (btw it is missing define USART_DELAY what...
-
whats new is online ? its same as offline (btw it is missing define USART_DELAY what...
-
the following one example is helpfull i believe #chip 16f628A, 4 #config OSC = INTOSC...
-
the following one example is helpfull i believe #chip 16f628A, 4 #config OSC = INTOSC...
-
hi and thanx both serial and hardware do NOT work in my program, either alone or...
-
following code ONLY works at 1200 baud, ANY other rate (tested 300,4800,9600,19200)...
-
following code ONLY works at 1200 baud, ANY other rate (tested 300,4800,9600,19200)...
-
version 0.94 yes just tried same program in microbasic pro and works ok, so all my...
-
following code ONLY works at 1200 baud, ANY other rate (tested 300,4800,9600,19200)...
-
following code ONLY works at 1200 baud, ANY other rate (tested 300,4800,9600,19200)...
-
a,thanx helpfull ! (now it saying 20 bytes out of 25 needed :) this info whould be...
-
a,tahnx helpfull ! (now it saying 20 bytes out of 25 needed :) this info whould be...
-
hi download the 31/03/2015 hotrelease but again it does not compile it ! here are...
-
hi its Version: 0.9 11/5/2014 (its the one at GCB@Syn download yesterday) so you...
-
hi thanks for the reply i confused now :) first if sonyremote.h need 19 bytes,and...
-
This is 19 +12+1=32 bytes far beyond 25 bytes. So only problem i see there is that...
-
i did extensive, since i posted this, test's and seems that only this code is enough...
-
i did extensive, since i posted this, test's and seems that only this code is enough...
-
i did extensive, since i posted this, test's and seems that only this code is enough...
-
Hello i try to compile a program for 16f54, wen i do is says "Error: Excessive RAM...
1
