Paul

Hi Fang, I'm not an expert and haven't used this for a while, but, two possible things did spring to mind on seeing your question: 1) I'd try setting backtrace to yes [-backtrace yes] as I think (could be wrong) with it set to "no" as is currently shown in the configuration settings, then it won't output anything on the command line. You could then at least see if you're getting any output at the command line. 2) I remember having a lot of issues with the cases between by dictionary and the LM file...

We use the LM Tool from time to time when we add a new book to our app (articulate.xyz it’s an English pronunciation app). The LM and dictionary for the book gets sent to the app for users to practice reading. We use both the web tool and scripts (depending on what we happen to be generating) Hope that’s useful. Paul Please excuse any spelling: Sent from my iPhone On 19 Apr 2022, at 21:21, Alex Rudnicky air@users.sourceforge.net wrote:  The code for quick_lm had been posted to the website. It's...

Am also seeing the same issue when trying to use the lmtool webpage (or CLI tool). The url ... http://www.speech.cs.cmu.edu/tools/lmtool-new.html .... is "up" and visible However, once a text file is attaced and "Compile knowledge base" is pressed, then (after a long time, maybe 1 or 2 minutes) the page either returns "not found" or "unexpectedly dropped the connection" I have successfully used this page in the past.

Thank you

Hello, I'm doing some work with Sphinxtrain and was wondering, does the tool search alternate phonetic spellings during the training process? For example, let's assume the transcript is something like " I REPLIED TO THE EMAIL (name_of_file)". If the dictionary has two alternative phonetic spellings for replied, something like .... REPLIED R IH P L AY D REPLIED(1) R IY P L AY D Does the training process automatically search both spellings to find the best fit? Or, must the transcript file be coded...