User Activity

  • Posted a comment on discussion Help on Launch4j Executable Wrapper

    As I noted in my message, I'm already using 3.50: So the first weirdness is the Version string at the top reporting 3.14 - I've triple checked that I have 3.50 installed. Is this a bug? I do not have 3.14 installed anywhere (that I can find), but the launch4j logs still seems to be reporting 3.14. Another developer is seeing the same behavior.

  • Posted a comment on discussion Help on Launch4j Executable Wrapper

    I have two JVMs installed, both in my PATH, with the 32-bit version first: C:\dev\sim>where java C:\rw_apps\Oracle-jdk1.8.0_181_x86\bin\java.exe C:\rw_apps\Adoptium-jdk-8.0.362.9-hotspot-x64\bin\java.exe For JNI reasons, I sometimes need to run the 32-bit JVM. But for most programs I want the 64-bit version. In my launch4j xml file I have: <jre> <path>%JAVA_HOME%;%PATH%</path> <requires64bit>true</requires64bit> <minversion>8</minversion> <maxversion>9</maxversion> </jre> No matter what I try and...

View All

Personal Data

Username:
peteflugstad
Joined:
2006-05-25 20:26:38

Projects

  • No projects to display.

Personal Tools