Owen Sharp

can we get some clarification on what the issue is with implementation of ability to export demolished elements to IFC? I'd seen some comment elsewhere (Adsk forum) that because the elements do not exist they can't be exported - but this is false as NWC does it. I can set up a view with Phase = New Construction and Phase Filter = Show All which displays my existing, demolished and new elements and export all of them to NWC. Why not IFC?

can we get some clarification on what the issue is with ability to export demolished elements to IFC? I'd seen some comment elsewhere (Adsk forum) that because the elements do not exist they can't be exported - but this is false as NWC does it. I can set up a view with Phase = New Construction and Phase Filter = Show All which displays my existing, demolished and new elements and export all of them to NWC. Why not IFC?

Hi Angel - just wondering if your team has been able to identify the issue yet?

Thanks Angel

error seems to have been introduced with the 18.3.2 update .. see link for tests from 18.3 thru 18.4: https://laingorourke.sharefile.com/d-s85f9f90c200408c9

hi, We've encountered an issue with circular profiled structural framing members being exported with incorrect geometry from the 18.4 version of the exporter - same elements exported using 18.2 are OK. Essentially the interior of the tube looks to be inverted to a square extrusion, and what should be the exterior of the tube is then subtracted - samples and screenshot can be downloaded from: https://laingorourke.sharefile.com/d-s823ec1e3e344b498

Sorry attachments option wasn't showing first time around - i've replaced the links with images

Hi, We have encountered a rather troubling bug whereby openings (penos) in Structural Framing elements are wrong in an IFC that is Opened as a Revit project, whereas when Linked they are showing correctly. It does not seem to be a straight-forward change in position or size, but rather in this case the penos are actually being replicated from different beams - or possibly the beam itself is being replaced with another similar beam which has different openings. attached are 2 images; first shows the...