Activity for Neustradamus
-
Neustradamus created ticket #14
Where is the development since 2013?
-
Dear @udt team, @lilyco, @ baccaharis, @ctchrinthry, @rlg128, dear all, I search any update since 2013: - https://sourceforge.net/projects/udt/files/ Can you help me? Thanks in advance. Regards
-
ksmbd - CIFS/SMB/SMBv1/SMBv2/SMBv3/Samba
-
Dear Alt-F team, @jcard, It is included in LTS Kernel: - 5.15.x - 6.1.x - 6.6.x It is possible to look it?
-
Dear Alt-F team, @jcard, It is included in LTS Kernel: - 5.15.x - 6.1.x - 6.6.x It is possible to look it?
-
Own ticket modification is impossible
-
Dear @keepass team, Can you add supports of : - SCRAM-SHA-1 - SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS - SCRAM-SHA-256 - SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS - SCRAM-SHA-512 - SCRAM-SHA-512-PLUS - SCRAM-SHA3-512 - SCRAM-SHA3-512-PLUS "When using the SASL SCRAM mechanism, the SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS variant SHOULD be preferred over the SCRAM-SHA-256 variant, and SHA-256 variants [RFC7677] SHOULD be preferred over SHA-1 variants [RFC5802]". SCRAM-SHA-1(-PLUS): -- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5802 -- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6120 SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS):...
-
Default Email field like Title/Username/Password
-
Default Email field like Title/Username/Password
-
I can not change the title... The title is not good, it must be: SCRAM-SHA-1(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-512(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA3-512(-PLUS) supports
-
Default email field like Title/Username/Password
-
Dear @keepass team, Can you add supports of : - SCRAM-SHA-1 - SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS - SCRAM-SHA-256 - SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS - SCRAM-SHA-512 - SCRAM-SHA-512-PLUS - SCRAM-SHA3-512 - SCRAM-SHA3-512-PLUS "When using the SASL SCRAM mechanism, the SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS variant SHOULD be preferred over the SCRAM-SHA-256 variant, and SHA-256 variants [RFC7677] SHOULD be preferred over SHA-1 variants [RFC5802]". SCRAM-SHA-1(-PLUS): -- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5802 -- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6120 SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS):...
-
SCRAM-SHA-1(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-512(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA3-512(-PLUS) supports
-
@brondsem: Really better now, thanks a lot! Can you look with team about my last part: Note that in this page, there are "Sourceforge" and "SourceForge", what is the good name? - https://slashdotmedia.com/terms-of-use/ It will be nice to harmonize at all places.
-
Dear @sf-support, Emails sent have not been changed, the problem of the missing dot (...) is always here. Can you look it? If I had SF access, I will do changes quickly, it is very easy to solve it. Thanks in advance. Sincerely, Neustradamus
-
To follow.
-
Dear @ludong, One year after, can you look my request? Thanks in advance. Linked to: - https://sourceforge.net/p/putty-nd/feature-requests/40/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/putty-nd/bugs/53/
-
Migration to GitHub
-
Moved box does not exist...
-
Dear @libtirpc team, @steved12345, @acharbon, @astrand, It is possible to have a GitHub organization/repository... Steve is here: https://github.com/stevedd astrand is here: https://github.com/astrand acharbon (not sure): https://github.com/acharbon Thanks in advance. Regards.
-
@anilsaharan, @jdpipe, @tlh2000, @maragkose: It is possible to give all rights to @inorton for the future of cunit? It will be better to have a continus project than a fork... Thanks in advance.
-
Dear @hdparm team, @ideguy, It is possible to put the project on GitHub? Thanks in advance.
-
Dear @rpcbind team, @steved12345, @acharbon, Like @kloczek, I would like to have a GitHub organization/repository... @kloczek: Note, it works currently: - http://git.linux-nfs.org/?p=steved/rpcbind.git;a=summary Steve is here: https://github.com/stevedd.
-
Dear @infozip team, @antinode2, @eewhite, @goathunter, @gordone, @roelofs, Can you answer to @allwit and me. There are a lot of CVEs never patched. In more, it will be nice to have an official InfoZip GitHub organization to contribute etc. Thanks in advance. Regards.
-
Dear @infozip team, @antinode2, @eewhite, @goathunter, @gordone, @roelofs, Can you answer to @kloczek and me. It is about all files and more: - https://sourceforge.net/projects/infozip/files/ Thanks in advance. Regards.
-
Dear Alt-F team, @jcard, Have you progressed on it? Thanks in advance.
-
Sent emails need improvements
-
@oheil: Have you progressed on it? Note there is: - https://pear.php.net/package/Auth_SASL
-
+1
-
@dreichl: Can you add the reference to CVE-2023-32784 in changelog/news? It is VERY IMPORTANT to specify it.
-
@pail459: Normally there is a delay between the internal vulnerability discovery information and the official CVE announcement. @dreichl: It is possible to put officially Keepass on GitHub to have more and more developers and have a better security? Links: - 2011-04-11: https://sourceforge.net/p/keepass/discussion/329220/thread/02383c83/ - 2015-10-12: https://sourceforge.net/p/keepass/discussion/329221/thread/97110c29/ - 2013-08-24: https://sourceforge.net/p/keepass/feature-requests/1776/ - 2015-05-08:...
-
@pail459: Normally there is a delay between the internal vulnerability discovery information and the official CVE announcement. It is possible to put Keepass on GitHub to have more and more developers and have a better security? Links: - 2011-04-11: https://sourceforge.net/p/keepass/discussion/329220/thread/02383c83/ - 2015-10-12: https://sourceforge.net/p/keepass/discussion/329221/thread/97110c29/ - 2013-08-24: https://sourceforge.net/p/keepass/feature-requests/1776/ - 2015-05-08: https://sourceforge.net/p/keepass/feature-requests/2001/...
-
@dreichl: I did not found the 2.54 with CVE fix... It is possible to publish the code on GitHub now, for a better development too?
-
@drkspider: Can you publish the complete sourcecode on GitHub? Thanks in advance.
-
Dear @nfs-ganesha team, @denielphilippe, @jcl-cea, @thomasleibovici, It will be nice to remove old parts like: - https://sourceforge.net/p/nfs-ganesha/patches/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/nfs-ganesha/news/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/nfs-ganesha/discussion/ Can you add a "move" box like https://sourceforge.net/projects/handbrake for example. - https://sourceforge.net/projects/nfs-ganesha/ To disable/delete tabs, go here: https://sourceforge.net/projects/nfs-ganesha/ To add a new tab, go here: https://sourceforge.net/projects/nfs-ganesha/...
-
GitHub migration is not complete
-
Dear PuTTY Session Manager team, @dmrpsm, It is possible to add the code on GitHub to have a best developement, visibility, contributions, ... After, you can add a "move" box like https://sourceforge.net/projects/handbrake for example. Example, WinMerge is now here, after several places and the developement is good: - https://github.com/winmerge Thanks in advance.
-
Migration to GitHub
-
Dear PuTTY Manager team, @piotrzuk, It is possible to add the code on GitHub to have a best developement, visibility, contributions, ... After, you can add a "move" box like https://sourceforge.net/projects/handbrake for example. Example, WinMerge is now here, after several places and the developement is good: - https://github.com/winmerge Thanks in advance.
-
Migration to GitHub
-
Migration to GitHub
-
Dear putty-nd team, @ludong, It is possible to add the code on GitHub to have a best developement, visibility, contributions, ... After, you can add a "move" box like https://sourceforge.net/projects/handbrake for example. Example, WinMerge is now here, after several places and the developement is good: - https://github.com/winmerge Thanks in advance.
-
Migration to GitHub
-
Dear Multi PuTTY Manager team, @tvhoan, It is possible to add the code on GitHub to have a best developement, visibility, contributions, ... After, you can add a "move" box like https://sourceforge.net/projects/handbrake for example. Example, WinMerge is now here, after several places and the developement is good: - https://github.com/winmerge Thanks in advance.
-
CIFS/SMB/SMBv1/SMBv2/SMBv3/Samba
-
Dear Alt-F team, @jcard, It is possible to improve the file transfer system? Have you seen this project, and repos? - https://github.com/cifsd-team - https://github.com/cifsd-team/ksmbd - https://github.com/cifsd-team/ksmbd-tools I think it is better to use it, no? Thanks in advance.
-
Migration to GitHub
-
Dear Alt-F team, @jcard, It is possible to add the code on GitHub to have a best developement, visibility, contributions, ... After, you can add a "move" box like https://sourceforge.net/projects/handbrake for example. Example, WinMerge is now here, after several places and the developement is good: - https://github.com/winmerge Thanks in advance.
-
@Tostis: Thanks! It is possible to update the SF project to inform that the code is now on GitHub?
-
SCRAM-SHA-1(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-512(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA3-512(-PLUS) supports
-
@Tostis and all, you can add in GitHub... - https://github.com/search?q=Areca+Backup
-
x64 builds are missing
-
@oheil: Thanks! :) Maybe good to create an organization on GitHub and inform people that the code is on it now ^^
-
Dear SquirrelMail team, @pdontthink, @jangliss, @jervfors, @kink, @alex-brainstorm, @avel, @bouchon, @braverock, @perlstalker, @tassium, I have forgotten the last RFC in the description: RFC9051: Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) - Version 4rev2: - https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc9051 I wish you a good reading.
-
SCRAM-SHA-1(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-512(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA3-512(-PLUS) supports
-
Migrate to GitHub to have a better developement
-
Hello @oheil, Have you progressed on it?
-
Migration to GitHub is incomplete
-
Official ClamWin forum is not secure
-
@sf-support: Why "Outbound emails (or network requests) are not allowed."?
-
@sf-support: Thanks for your reply! It is specified that Sourceforge has blocked mail server... November 17, 2018 05:07PM SourceForge has blocked any mail system to work, internal or external. It is out of our hands to fix it. They should have kept the external and this forum script has the ability to use external servers, but, even they blocked them. - http://kmeleonbrowser.org/forum/read.php?12,147514,page=2 Can you look? Thanks in advance.
-
e-mails are not sent
-
Dear @dreichl and all others, I wish you a Happy New Year! It is possible to exclude a or several characters in a password profile, no problem. But after a password generation there is a problem when we do "Derivate from previous password". The exclude does not work. To confirm the bug: - You can create a profile with your options and for example with exclusions : aA - Save the profile - Generate a new password with the profile, no problem - Generate a new password with "Derivate from previous password",...
-
@ipavlov: Have you looked, after several years (more 10 years) and requests, to move 7-Zip and your other projects on GitHub to have more development, contributions, visibility, etc. Thanks in advance from all requesters.
-
@ipavlov: Have you looked, after several years (more 10 years) and requests, to move 7-Zip and your others projects on GitHub to have more development, contributions, visibility, etc. Thanks in advance from all requesters.
-
:) Do not forget to do an announcement etc.
-
@oheil: Thanks too! We are in 2022, for me NOCC was dead and I see some change in 2021 by chance. Like you know, it is easy to involve, to contribute, to develop on GitHub. It will be nice to have officially the project on GitHub like all historical hosted projects on Sourceforge before. Of course, mailinglists can be always used on Sourceforge for example ^^
-
Dear NOCC team, @gerundt, @nicocha, @oheil, @radical-tobi, @wolruf, In first, I wish you a Happy New Year. It is possible to add the code on GitHub to have a best developement, visibility, contributions, ... After, you can add a "move" box like https://sourceforge.net/projects/handbrake for example. Example, WinMerge is now here, after several places and the developement is good: - https://github.com/winmerge Thanks in advance.
-
Migration to GitHub is incomplete
-
Dear NOCC team, @gerundt, @nicocha, @oheil, @radical-tobi, @wolruf, In first, I wish you a Happy New Year. It is possible to add the code on GitHub to have a best developement, visibility, contributions, ... After, you can add a "move" box like https://sourceforge.net/projects/handbrake for example. Example, WinMerge is now here, after several place and the developement is good: - https://github.com/winmerge Thanks in advance.
-
Dear @ipavlov: I would like an official organization and repository by product too, to have a better development and contributions. I think it is very important to do it quickly, we are in 2021, soon in 2022. More 10 years since the request. Thanks in advance. Linked to: - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/feature-requests/1028/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/feature-requests/1169/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/discussion/45797/thread/6307c6fd/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/discussion/45797/thread/7a122fc2/...
-
Dear @ipavlov: I would like an official organization and repository by product too, to have a better development and contributions. I think it is very important to do it quickly, we are in 2021, soon in 2022. More 10 years since the request. Thanks in advance. Linked to: - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/feature-requests/1028/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/feature-requests/1169/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/discussion/45797/thread/6307c6fd/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/discussion/45797/thread/7a122fc2/...
-
Dear @ipavlov: I would like an official organization and repository by product too, to have a better development and contributions. I think it is very important to do it quickly, we are in 2021, soon in 2022. More 10 years since the request. Thanks in advance. Linked to: - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/feature-requests/1028/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/feature-requests/1169/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/discussion/45797/thread/6307c6fd/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/discussion/45797/thread/7a122fc2/...
-
Dear @ipavlov: I would like an official organization and repository by product too, to have a better development and contributions. I think it is very important to do it quickly, we are in 2021, soon in 2022. More 10 years since the request. Thanks in advance. Linked to: - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/feature-requests/1028/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/feature-requests/1169/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/discussion/45797/thread/6307c6fd/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/discussion/45797/thread/7a122fc2/...
-
Dear @ipavlov: I would like an official organization and repository by product too, to have a better development and contributions. I think it is very important to do it quickly, we are in 2021, soon in 2022. More 10 years since the request. Thanks in advance. Linked to: - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/feature-requests/1028/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/feature-requests/1169/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/discussion/45797/thread/6307c6fd/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/discussion/45797/thread/7a122fc2/...
-
I would like an official organization and repository by product too, to have a better development and contributions. I think it is very important to do it quickly, we are in 2021, soon in 2022. Linked to: - https://sourceforge.net/p/infozip/feature-requests/8/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/infozip/bugs/60/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/infozip/bugs/66/ Note that Mark Adler has done a fork here: - https://github.com/madler/unzip
-
I would like an official organization and repository by product too, to have a better development and contributions. I think it is very important to do it quickly, we are in 2021, soon in 2022. Linked to: - https://sourceforge.net/p/infozip/feature-requests/8/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/infozip/bugs/60/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/infozip/bugs/66/ Note that Mark Adler has done a fork here: - https://github.com/madler/unzip
-
I would like an official organization and repository by product too, to have a better development and contributions. I think it is very important to do it quickly, we are in 2021, soon in 2022. Linked to: - https://sourceforge.net/p/infozip/feature-requests/8/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/infozip/bugs/60/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/infozip/bugs/66/ Note that Mark Adler has done a fork here: - https://github.com/madler/unzip
-
I would like an official repo too, to have a better development and contributions. I think it is very important to do it quickly, we are in 2021, soon in 2022. Linked to: - https://sourceforge.net/p/infozip/feature-requests/8/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/infozip/bugs/60/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/infozip/bugs/66/ -
-
I would like an official repo too, to have a better development and contributions. I think it is very important to do it quickly, we are in 2021, soon in 2022. Linked to: - https://sourceforge.net/p/infozip/feature-requests/8/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/infozip/bugs/60/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/infozip/bugs/66/ -
-
I think it is time to change it, we are in 2021, soon in 2022. With this, there will be a better development. I have opened a ticket here: https://sourceforge.net/p/keepass/bugs/2123/ And 2 tickets on GitHub: - https://github.com/dlech/KeeAgent/issues/330 - https://github.com/dlech/Keebuntu/issues/72 Thanks in advance.
-
@pail459: Thanks for your reply! The original request is very old: - https://sourceforge.net/p/keepass/discussion/329221/thread/97110c29/ The world changes, ... Time to move like all other projects... cc: @dreichl
-
Move to GitHub like other projects
-
oups same comment than previous, can be removed.
-
I am lost, on the website : - https://www.7-zip.org/ I see: 7-Zip 21.01 2021-03-09 7-Zip 21.01 alpha 7-Zip 21.01 2021-03-09 7-Zip for Linux 7-Zip 21.00 2021-01-19 7-Zip 21.00 alpha 7-Zip 20.02 2020-08-08 7-Zip 20.02 alpha 7-Zip for ARM64 2020-08-08 7-Zip for ARM64 7-Zip 19.00 2019-02-21 7-Zip 19.00 The 21.01 has been released or it is the 21.01 alpha ? And I see : - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/discussion/45797/thread/cec5e63147/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/discussion/45797/thread...
-
I am lost, on the website : - https://www.7-zip.org/ I see: 7-Zip 21.01 2021-03-09 7-Zip 21.01 alpha 7-Zip 21.01 2021-03-09 7-Zip for Linux 7-Zip 21.00 2021-01-19 7-Zip 21.00 alpha 7-Zip 20.02 2020-08-08 7-Zip 20.02 alpha 7-Zip for ARM64 2020-08-08 7-Zip for ARM64 7-Zip 19.00 2019-02-21 7-Zip 19.00 The 21.01 has been released or it is the 21.01 alpha? And I see : - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/discussion/45797/thread/cec5e63147/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/discussion/45797/thread/...
-
I am lost, on the website : - https://www.7-zip.org/ I see: 7-Zip 21.01 2021-03-09 7-Zip 21.01 alpha 7-Zip 21.01 2021-03-09 7-Zip for Linux 7-Zip 21.00 2021-01-19 7-Zip 21.00 alpha 7-Zip 20.02 2020-08-08 7-Zip 20.02 alpha 7-Zip for ARM64 2020-08-08 7-Zip for ARM64 7-Zip 19.00 2019-02-21 7-Zip 19.00 The 21.01 has been released or it is the 21.01 alpha ? And I see : - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/discussion/45797/thread/cec5e63147/ - https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/discussion/45797/thread...
-
Any news on it?
1