Modo Donuts

Makes sense. Thanks!

Hi Miro, Thank you for the quick response! This answer gave me further insight to the flexibility/functionality of QM. My team and I are looking to see how the development process using outside IDEs (notepad++/vscode) would "feel" To give an example, this would be look for QM using QPCPP. Create an operation (or set of operations) with parameter(s) for a class, but leave the code portion blank. Create an external file to capture functions that belong to said class. In the external file, use the generative...

solved! Decided to just do it the way suggested by the link I posted. Thanks!

I do enjoy the convenience of the code generation abilities of QM. I'm wondering if it's possible to have QM stub out functions on external files, then on those external files add the code, and upon further generation (maybe adding another function or something) the code written within the function is not overwritten. Thanks!

For context, I am currently trying to convert a Rhapsody Model into a QM model in order to see how painful of a process it is going to be. I understand that it would be in my best interest to develop with a "QM first" paradigm, but at this point in time it's in my best interest to start with a Rhapsody model and try to replicate it in QM. Examples are attached as QM_example and Rhapsody_example. The model is a simple dishwasher example offered by a class from Rhapsody. There's a state called Active,...