Max Funk

Hallo Kevin, when I figured out, how to compile the acousto program files, then I found two essential issues: the first was to link to the right lapack library; best solution was: ln -s /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libscalapack-openmpi.a /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libscalapack.a or alternatively, if your distribution has a dynamic library (check the respective file for existence): ln -s /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libscalapack-openmpi.so /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libscalapack.so the second issue was: The...

Also working with jEdit 5.5

Unicode names changed to java builtin

Hallo Giorgio, many thanks for your investigation and your reply :-) It's valuable to see that custombc 2 does no more than writing the boundcond file and then performing the same as custombc 1 I have now created the boundcond with a simple script file; perhaps it could be attached to the RoomAcoustics tutorial; I attach it below... As a feedback, I wanted to say, that at the moment I prefer custombc=0 because in a simple calculation I need just a frequency-independent absorption coefficient, which...

Hallo Acousto team, Giorgio, I investigated further custom boundcond 2 and everything is fine when the number of frequencies nome =... equals the number of boundary conditions, e.g. gmshbc=["wall%d",...]; nome=3; ... wall0={...}; wall1={...}; wall2={...}; ... or gmshbc=["wall",...]; nome=1; ... wall={...}; ... However, if nome is greater than the number of given conditions, even with frequency independent conditions gmshbc=["wall","ceil", "floor"]; nome=3; ... wall={...}; ceil={...}; floor={...};...

Thanks for the info.

To put it short; I like very much this feature: boundary condition with gmsh and physical tags, and on the other side I would like to use the impedance boundcond - is it possible to combine these?