Size mismatch of VOS_IF_REC_T between source and header on linux
Understood Thank you for the explanation.
I noted that with the changes in this ticket and the corresponding commit https://sourceforge.net/p/tcnopen/trdp/2398/ We lose the option to flag a com_id as TSN from the XML. Wouldn't it be possible to add it to < pd-param> and < pd-com-param> similar to the marshall flag? And it is now not possible to set com-params on a per com_id basis. This seems like a loss of capabilities to me and makes the XML file missleading. Is it planned to remove the com-param-id in < telegram> from XML or bring back...
Inconsistency for returned sequence counters after a timeout
Incomplete check in vos_netIfUp for DSA switch attached interfaces