Activity for Matthew Brett

  • Matthew Brett Matthew Brett posted a comment on ticket #58

    On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 10:40 PM Adam Turner via Docutils-develop docutils-develop@lists.sourceforge.net wrote: There is some progress, see the update to todo in [r9059] (https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/dev/todo.html#repository). The script is not yet fully finished though, and I don't know who controls docutils/docutils, we'd want to talk to them too to get a transfer done. Thanks for this update. Is the script somewhere visible for others to help with? What remains to be done, for the script?...

  • Matthew Brett Matthew Brett posted a comment on ticket #7

    I'm sorry - I'm hardly using this forum - would you mind posting over at https://marsbar.discourse.group/ ?

  • Matthew Brett Matthew Brett posted a comment on ticket #58

    Hi, On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 3:06 PM engelbert gruber via Docutils-develop docutils-develop@lists.sourceforge.net wrote: Beats me ... since when is the choice of newbies an argument for going that way. Sorry - just couldn't help it. I think you will find that a huge majority of experienced developers would strongly support a switch to Github, to support both experienced developers, and newbies. Fortunately for everyone, I can restrain myself from repeating the arguments as to why I'm sure that is...

  • Matthew Brett Matthew Brett posted a comment on ticket #58

    Hi, On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:11 PM engelbert gruber via Docutils-develop docutils-develop@lists.sourceforge.net wrote: what is so hard about the question: i really would like to know: so i repeat it is there a difference if you clone from the docutils-mirror on github to cloning from a docutils master on github ? thanks for your kindness I would still argue, as I did above, that it only really becomes clear why Git and Github are very much better for this workflow, once you've used them for a while....

  • Matthew Brett Matthew Brett posted a comment on ticket #58

    On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 11:35 PM engelbert gruber via Docutils-develop docutils-develop@lists.sourceforge.net wrote: On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 at 13:37, Matthew Brett matthewbrett@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Yes, I know this is a recurring thread - but I was really responding to this: On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 10:28 PM engelbert gruber via Docutils-develop docutils-develop@lists.sourceforge.net wrote: [snip] do you know all uses of the sandbox ? did you see the quality of patches we get ? lacking everything,...

  • Matthew Brett Matthew Brett posted a comment on ticket #58

    Yes, I know this is a recurring thread - but I was really responding to this: On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 10:28 PM engelbert gruber via Docutils-develop docutils-develop@lists.sourceforge.net wrote: [snip] do you know all uses of the sandbox ? did you see the quality of patches we get ? lacking everything, not even some documentation ... from the same people complaining the documentation of docutils is bad I may have misunderstood, but I took that comment to suggest that moving to Github was a bad idea...

  • Matthew Brett Matthew Brett posted a comment on ticket #58

    I have not contributed to Docutils, apart from some bug reports, but I have worked on most scientific Python projects, and have several of my own. The collaboration features of Git / Github (or Gitlab, or whatever) are vastly superior to the SVN / Sourceforge equivalents, and this has obvious consequences in terms of: Increased quality of community engagement Size of the developer community. I'd like to emphasize the first. It may not be obvious, but my experience is that - the clunkier and more...

  • Matthew Brett Matthew Brett posted a comment on discussion Open Discussion

    I'm really sorry I missed this one. If you still haven't solved this - can you post over at https://marsbar.discourse.group/ ?

  • Matthew Brett Matthew Brett posted a comment on discussion Help

    Ah - sorry - I should have said - we've moved now, to https://marsbar.discourse.group/ - could you post again there? I'll reply as soon as I can.

  • Matthew Brett Matthew Brett posted a comment on ticket #6

    Sorry - I'm afraid I don't monitor this forum. Could you post to the mailing list instead? Cheers, Matthew

  • Matthew Brett Matthew Brett posted a comment on ticket #375

    The Author is listed as docutils-develop@lists.sourceforge.net . The maintainer is PyPI user bkyryliuk , who appears, from one of their other projects), to be Bogdan Kyryliuk b.kyryliuk@gmail.com .

  • Matthew Brett Matthew Brett posted a comment on ticket #5

    Sorry - I should have disabled the support request part of this site - it's rarely...

  • Matthew Brett Matthew Brett posted a comment on ticket #4

    Hi, On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Ceyda Sayali zceydas@users.sf.net wrote: [support-requests:#4]...

  • Matthew Brett Matthew Brett posted a comment on ticket #9

    I'm afraid it is necessary to have a base-space for the ROIs - that includes the...

  • Matthew Brett Matthew Brett posted a comment on ticket #8

    On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Pauline Favre eniluapervaf@users.sf.net wrote: Hi...

  • Matthew Brett Matthew Brett posted a comment on ticket #8

    On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Pauline Favre eniluapervaf@users.sf.net wrote: [bugs:#8]...

  • Matthew Brett Matthew Brett posted a comment on ticket #26

    Yes, I think the '-V' flag is a distraction - it's arising and causing the error...

  • Matthew Brett Matthew Brett posted a comment on ticket #27

    Is this a windows support request?

  • Matthew Brett Matthew Brett posted a comment on discussion ATLAS on Windows

    Thanks a lot for this. Is your Cygwin in "Program files (x86)" by any chance? In...

  • Matthew Brett Matthew Brett posted a comment on discussion ATLAS on Windows

    Hi, Sorry - would you mind posting the problem you have again, so we can keep track...

  • Matthew Brett Matthew Brett posted a comment on discussion ATLAS on Windows

    Sorry for the delay in replying. Which version of ATLAS are you trying to build?...

1