Master CATZ

edit the more I think about it if it's not already a feature request can we please have set file size limits for parity files or does it already split evenly based on the amount of file locations ? I know you say not to store parity on the data disk ,but if its a multi partitioned disk or has volume quota's set would there be any harm in splitting the parity into those ? data p1 d1-d24 and parity p2 d1-d24 then parity could be spanned across multiple disks and might be possible to rebuild a good...

I know you say not to store parity on the data disk ,but if its a multi partitioned disk or has volume quota's set would there be any harm in splitting the parity into those ? data p1 d1-d24 and parity p2 d1-d24 then parity could be spanned across multiple disks and might be possible to rebuild a good parity file when multiple disks fail ? ie, you could restore the parity file from a dead disk first to a safe location then backup all the other parity files so if another drive fails during restore...

I know you say not to store parity on the data disk ,but if its a multi partitioned disk or has volume quota's set would there be any harm in splitting the parity into those ? data p1 d1-d24 and parity p2 d1-d24 then parity could be spanned across multiple disks and might be possible to rebuild a good parity file when multiple disks fail ? ie, you could restore the parity file from a dead disk first to a safe location then backup all the other parity files so if another drive fails during restore...

I know you say not to store parity on the data disk ,but if its a multi partitioned disk or has volume quota's set would there be any harm in splitting the parity into those ? data p1 d1-d24 and parity p2 d1-d24 then parity could be spanned across multiple disks and might be possible to rebuild a good parity file when multiple disks fail ? ie, you could restore the parity file from a dead disk first to a safe location then backup all the other parity files so if another drive fails during restore...

I know you say not to store parity on the data disk ,but if its a multi partitioned disk or has volume quota's set or has a seperate mraid / zfs / btrfs, raid partitions etc would there be any harm in splitting the parity into those ? data p1 d1-d24 and parity p2 d1-d24 then parity could be spanned across multiple disks and might be possible to rebuild a good parity file when multiple disks fail ? ie, you could restore the parity file from a dead disk first to a safe location then backup all the...

I know you say not to store parity on the data disk ,but if its a multi partitioned disk or has volume quota's set would there be any harm in splitting the parity into those ? data p1 d1-d24 and parity p2 d1-d24 then parity could be spanned across multiple disks and might be possible to rebuild a good parity file when multiple disks fail ? ie, you could restore the parity file from a dead disk first to a safe location then backup all the other parity files so if another drive fails during restore...

I know you say not to store parity on the data disk ,but if its a multi partitioned disk or has volume quota's set would there be any harm in splitting the parity into those ? data p1 d1-d24 and parity p2 d1-d24 then parity could be spanned across multiple disks and might be possible to rebuild a good parity file when multiple disks fail ? ie, you could restore the parity file from a dead disk first to a safe location then backup all the other parity files so if another drive fails during restore...

I know you say not to store parity on the data disk ,but if its a multi partitioned disk or has volume quota's set would there be any harm in splitting the parity into those ? data p1 d1-d24 and parity p2 d1-d24 then parity could be spanned across multiple disks and might be possible to rebuild a good parity file when multiple disks fail ? ie, you could restore the parity file from a dead disk first to a safe location then backup all the other parity files so if another drive fails during restore...