Lucy Phipps

fix typos

fix non-ASCII text files

fix non-ASCII text files

A few more questions: does ScalerTest 1.1 use xBRZ 1.8? What program did you use to compile the Windows ScalerTest.exe? I ask because I'm writing a little command-line wrapper for xBRZ that's configurable like ScalerTest's GUI is, and when I compile it with MSYS2-CLANG64 and test it with ARGB or ARGB_UNBUFFERED, the colour blending on transparent pixels has slightly different results to ScalerTest. (Buffered or not makes no difference, as long as I don't change luminanceWeight since it only affects...

A few more questions: does ScalerTest 1.1 use xBRZ 1.8? What program did you use to compile the Windows ScalerTest.exe? I ask because I'm writing a little command-line wrapper for xBRZ that's configurable like ScalerTest's GUI is, and when I compile it with MSYS2-CLANG64 and test it with ARGB or ARGB_UNBUFFERED, the colour blending on transparent pixels has slightly different results to ScalerTest. (Buffered or not makes no difference, as long as I don't change luminanceWeight since it only affects...

A few more questions: does ScalerTest 1.1 use xBRZ 1.8? What program did you use to compile the Windows ScalerTest.exe? I ask because I'm writing a little command-line wrapper for xBRZ that's configurable like ScalerTest's GUI is, and when I compile it with MSYS2-CLANG64 and test it with ARGB or ARGB_UNBUFFERED, the colour blending on transparent pixels has slightly different results to ScalerTest. (Buffered or not makes no difference, as long as I don't change luminanceWeight since it only affect...

a few more questions: does ScaletTest 1.1 use xBRZ 1.8? what program did you use to compile the windows ScalerTest.exe? I ask because I'm writing a little wrapper for it, and when I compile it with MSYS2-CLANG64 and test it with ARGB or ARGB_UNBUFFERED, the colour blending on transparent pixels has slightly different results. It's probably rounding error. So I'm going to try to find out which rounding mode ScalerTest has and which mine has. Or maybe it's that ScalerTest does 36/10 instead of 3.6...

There are several mentions of xBRZ 1.9 in the DOSBox directory here on SourceForge, DOSBox_0.74-3+xBRZ_1.9+Save_States_Source.7z doesn't include the xBRZ source itself, and the xBRZ directory only has up to 1.8. Are the DOSBox changelog and filename wrong, or did you not upload 1.9 yet, or did you take it down because it was broken, or what? Just curious