Kyle Fazzari

Seems reasonable on the surface, I'll have a deeper poke about soon. Looks like you decided to go with the LGPL instead of MIT?

Yes indeed!

I'll look into it once I'm able. When are you planning on rolling a new GetPot release with the license changes?

I'm happy to help, although it looks like you're already building a deb. What issues have you run into?

As far as the issues that started this discussion, your modifications look great, thank you! Note that several examples are still licensed under the LGPL, but there's really no issue with that. Just wanted to make sure you were aware given the move to MIT.

Hey there Frank, just wanted to check on this one. Any progress? Can I help?

Thanks Frank, I appreciate that! If it helps, here's my suggested patch (applied to v1.1.18), updating the header as well to conform with https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.en.html: diff -ru getpot-c++-backup/examples/nominus_followers.cpp getpot-c++/examples/nominus_followers.cpp --- getpot-c++-backup/examples/nominus_followers.cpp 2017-10-26 12:54:40.233756391 -0700 +++ getpot-c++/examples/nominus_followers.cpp 2017-10-26 13:12:43.760490217 -0700 @@ -3,24 +3,19 @@ // // (C) 2006 Frank R. Schaefer...

Thanks Frank, I appreciate that! If it helps, here's my suggested patch (applied to v1.1.18): diff -ru getpot-c++-backup/examples/nominus_followers.cpp getpot-c++/examples/nominus_followers.cpp --- getpot-c++-backup/examples/nominus_followers.cpp 2017-10-26 12:54:40.233756391 -0700 +++ getpot-c++/examples/nominus_followers.cpp 2017-10-26 13:12:43.760490217 -0700 @@ -3,24 +3,19 @@ // // (C) 2006 Frank R. Schaefer // -// NOTE: The LPGL License for this library is only valid in case that -// it is not...